282 JO URNAL, BOMB A Y NA TUBAL HISTOR Y SOCIETY, Vol. X. 



" T. FRATEENA, n. sp." Of the four specimens labelle'd T. /m- 

 terna in Mr. Moore's handwriting, one is quite typical T. hecabeoides^ 

 and the other three are again the ordinary dry-season form of 

 T. hecabe and might be equally well arranged under either T. contuberna- 

 lis or T. patruelis. Neither T. fraterna nor T. patruelis has been 

 correctly identified in the British Museum collection, where rather 

 diifferent dry-season forms of T. hecabe from North-West India have 

 beeii identified under these names, as will be seen by a reference to the 

 key to the genus given in my previous paper. This misidentification 

 is, however, of very small importance, as the forms described by Moore 

 and those identified in the British Museum are all nothing more than 

 slight variations in the dry-season form of T. hecabe. 



" T. MERGUIANA, n. sp." This has also been wrongly identified 

 in the British Museum, where the ordinary rainy-season form 

 of T. silhetana is arranged under this name. True T. merguifXna is a 

 form of T. hecabe, with the typical form of which the male type 

 agrees in the markings of the underside, but on the upperside of 

 the forewing the dilatation of the black margin at the outer 

 margin, instead of being squared, has its inner edge inclined obliquely 

 outwards. This is a character also found in T. silhetana^ as well as 

 in many forms of T. hecabe^ e.g., T. sioinhoei. It is curious to note 

 that of the six specimens labelled T. merguiana by Mr. Moore, 

 three are without apical markings on the underside of the forewing, 

 while the other three (one of which is the female " type ") have these 

 markings more or less developed. T. merguiana is the commonest 

 form of T. hecabe found in Sumatra, and grades imperceptibly into 

 the typical form. 



" T. ANDERSONII, n. sp." This appears to be a quite distinct 

 species ; it is the T. kana of the British Museum, but not of Moore ; it 

 is also therefore the species previously referred to by me as T. kana^ 

 and is also the species recorded under that name from Sikhim by 

 Mr. de Niceville, on my identification, in the " Gazetteer of Sikhim, " 

 1894, p. 167, n. 424. I find, on enquiry, that I was mistaken in sup- 

 posing that the single specimen of this species in the British Museum 

 was labelled '' T. kana type ; " the true type of T. kana is now before 

 me, and is referred to below. In T. andersonu^ as in T, merguiana, 

 Mr. Moore allows considei'able variation, and if he had treated the 



