880 JOURNAL, BOMBAY NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY, Vol. T. 



be absolutely no question that the variation is merely sexual, so isota 

 should be sunk as a synonym. 



285. Hyarotis adrastus, Cramer. 

 Upper Chindwin, May ; not common. 



286. Arnetta subtestacea, Moore. 

 A single specimen at the foot of the hills and two in the Upper 

 Chindwin all in March. I am unable to say how A. khasiana differs 

 from the present species, and think it is identical with it ; there is no 

 doubt that A. atkinsonii is its rainy-season form. 

 287. Matapa aria, Moore. 

 Common in the Upper Chindwin from March to May, not noticed 

 in the hills. 



288. Matapa druna, Moore. 

 Similarly distributed, but not as common as the preceding. 



289. Gangara thyrsis, Fabricius. 

 A single specimen from the Upper Chindwin in May, and a second 

 from 3j500 feet in the rains. 



290. Udaspes folus, Moore. 

 Common in the Upper Chindwin. 



291. NOTOCRYPTA RESTRICTA, MoorO. 



A single specimen from 3,500 feet in the rains. 



292. CupiTHA PURREEA, Moore. 



Two males taken in the Upper Chindwin in March and May. One 

 typical tympanifera^ the other transitional to purreea. 



293. AuGiADEs BRAHMA, Moore. 



Eleven males at from 5,500 to 7,000 feet in March, April and May. 

 These specimens differ from ty|3ical ones from Mussooree in being 

 slightly smaller and darker. They ai'e otherwise quite inseparable 

 from A. hrahma, and the above slight differences are not sufficient to 

 warrant their being; treated even as a local race. One would have 

 expected to find the Khasi Hill species, A. siva^ in the Chin Hills and 

 not the Himalayan A. hrahma ; my specimens are^ however, distinctly 

 nearer to hrahma than to siva. 



294. Telicota augias, Linnseus. 

 A single male from the Upper Chindwin in May. 



295. Telicota bambus^, Moore. 



A single female from the Upper Chindwin in March* 



