Cct—Dec., 1919 Bulletin of Brooklyn Entomological Society 143 
injurious to balm-of-gilead (Populus candicans) and Texas ash 
_ (Fraxinus berlandiert). 
Leptoypha costata Parshley. Specimens from Urbana, hue 
have been examined since the previous publication, and Drake 
has recorded? it from Arkansas and Colorado. This species has 
been recorded as feeding on witch hazel, but I have been unable 
to find it on this plant. I have, however, collected it from ash. 
Leptoypha elliptica McAtee. The known range of this species 
has been extended from Texas to Georgia and Florida* Pro- 
fessor Drake informs me that it has been taken on Ilex sp. in 
company with L. ilicis Drake. 
Leptoypha mutica Say. The known range has been extended 
to Georgia and Florida. (Drake, op. cit., p. 88. ) 
Replace the name L. brevicornis in next to last line on p. 58 
with L. drakei. Drake has described’ from Stone Mt., Gaia 
species, L. ilicis, distinguished from mutica by much shorter an- 
tenne and smaller size. 
Leptoypha brevicornis Champion. Professor Carl J) Drake 
has kindly pointed out that the species described under this name 
in my paper is not L. brevicornis Champion. The latter belongs 
in the subdivision of the genus with explanate costal area. dite 
misidentification is an inexcusable error, with respect to which I 
can do no more than acknowledge full responsibility and record 
my regret. The species described on pp. 59-60 of the paper here 
revised is therefore left without a name, and I take pleasure in 
naming it Leptoypha drakei. The type specimens are those men- 
tioned on p. 60, collected in the Argus Mountains, Calif., April, 
1891, by Albert Koebele, and are in the collection of the National 
Museum. Devil’s River, Texas, is a locality in addition to those 
previously recorded. 
Leptostyla clitorie Heidemann. Mr. Van Duzee’s Catalogue 
of the Hemiptera of America North of Mexico® having been pub- 
lished since my paper, it is well to state that I still find my dis- 
posal of the Leptostyla species satisfactory and pari passu those 
of the Catalogue not so. L. clitorie Heidemann (Osborn and 
3 Bul. Brooklyn Ent. Soc., 13, No. 4, October, 1918, p. 87. 
4 Drake, loc. cit. 
5In company with a new species of the same genus. 
6 Univ. Calif. Publ. Tech. Bul. Entomology, Vol. 2, November 30, 1917. 
