SEYFFARTH—CHAMPOLLION AND RENOUF. 563 
ent, also, remains “ sous-en 
urther, those popes a grey Teena have “not 
adopted Seyffarth’s system, but Dr. Young’s.” “The right- 
ful claimant is not Seyffa acer but Dr. Young.” In this case, 
however, they were obliged heneaels to confess and acknowl- 
t their “master” had unjustly condemned Young’s 
discoveries. For the rest, nies principle, as well as that adop- 
ted ted the said savans, are, as we have seen, totally different 
oung’s co nih For I stated, that, in general, each of 
ie 600 hiero lyphs valyphie fig the consonants contained in 
lps express conso onants to ether with vowels, “ 
nal g 
names, consist of symbolic characters. 
Further, “Champollion’s disciples have been guilty of no 
apostacy, ee have only followed their master’s example in 
know bic values to other hieroglyphs.” I do not . 
whether this “epebar ee is contradictory to the a 
ing. atead being the first discoverer of faeces ih 
is cea | labie_ values ” 
< apostatizing fom Cham 
it is absurd to conclude, without farther es 
: ae ae whole syllabic 
mpollionists, even the most able, as Rosel- 
i Ung Salvalini, postin De Saulcy, Leemans, 
