INTRODUCTION. 45 



Mudge, E. H., Further notes upon preglacial drainage in Michigan: Am. Jour. Sei., 4th ser., vol. 10, 1900, pp. 158-160. 



Discusses the bearing of certain well records on old drainage. 

 Nellist, J. F., Water supplies of Kent County, Mich.: Water-Supply Paper U. S. Geol. Survey No. 182, 1908, 

 pp. 267-278. 



Discusses flowing-well areas and municipal supplies. 

 Newberry, J. S., The surface geology of the basins of the Great Lakes, etc.: Am. Naturalist, vol. 4, 1871, pp. 193-218. 

 Also Annals New York Lyceum Nat. .Hist., vol. 9, 1871, pp. 213-234. A briefer paper appears in Proc. Boston 

 Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. 9, 1865, pp. 42nt6. 



Asserts that the lake basins have a connected drainage system lower than the present and suggests that this was 

 followed by the ice sheet even to a movement from Lake Erie into Lake Ontario. Thinks that the ice produced 

 the broad and deep boat-shaped basins, and that a large inland sea followed .the glacial epoch and distributed 

 bowlders and gravel and produced lake ridges. 



On the structure and origin of the Great Lakes: Proc. New York Lyceum Nat. Hist., 2d ser., 1874, pp. 136-138. 



Gives ice erosion as well as preglacial drainage a prominent r61e. A similar discussion appears in Proc. Am. 

 Philos. Soc, vol. 20, 1883, pp. 91-95. 



Surface geology: Geology of Ohio, vol. 2, 1874, pp. 1-80, 183-186, 197-204, 206-210. 



Gives much attention to the origin and history of the Great Lakes. Earlier reports in Rept. Progress Ohio Geol. 

 Survey for 1869, and in vol. 1, 1873, discuss the history of the Great Lakes to some extent. 



Drift deposits of Indiana: Fourteenth Ann. Rept. Dept. Geology and Nat. Hist. Indiana, 1884, pp. 85-97. 



Gives general resume of the origin and structure of the drift deposits without special application to Indiana. 

 Newsom, J. F., Drainage of southern Indiana: Jour. Geol., vol. 10, 1902, pp. 166-181. 



Compares postglacial and preglacial drainage and discusses effect of glaciation on drainage and on topography. 

 Owen, Richard, Geological reconnaissance of Indiana, 1859-60, 368 pp., Indianapolis, 1862. 



Briefly discusses glacial deposits in connection with notes pertaining to each of many counties in central and 



northern Indiana. Calls attention to Gilboa Ridge in Benton County, to bowlder belts in Benton and Warren 



counties, to gold in the drift of Carroll, Clinton, Henry, and Brown counties, and to numerous other Pleistocene 



features. 



Peter, Robert, A report of the chemical analyses of 33 soils of Indiana: Owen's Geological reconnaissance of Indiana, 



1859-60, pp. 241-268. 

 Phinney, A. J., Reports upon drift and surface geology of the following counties of Indiana: Delaware County: Elev- 

 enth Ann. Rept. Dept. Geology and Nat. Hist. Indiana, 1881, pp. 126-136; Randolph County: Twelfth Rept., 

 1882, pp. .177-184; Grant County: Thirteenth Rept., 1883, -pp. 138-143; Henry County and parts of Randolph, 

 Delaware, and Wayne counties: Fifteenth Rept., 1886, pp. 97-116. 



The natural-gas field of Indiana: Eleventh Ann.. Rept. U. S. Geol. Survey, 1891, pt. 1, pp. 589-742. 



Presents many well records showing thickness of drift. 

 Pierce, James, Notice of the peninsula of Michigan in relation to its topography, scenery, agriculture, population, 

 resources, etc.: Am. Jour. Sci., vol. 10, 1826, pp. 304-319. 

 Gives a good description for that early date. 

 Pltjmmer, J. T., Geology about Richmond, Ind.: Am. Jour. Sci., vol. 44, 1843, pp. 281-313. 



Notes the strias, buried wood, bowlders, soils, springs, etc., in vicinity of Richmond, Ind. 

 Price, J. A., Road materials in Allen County, Ind.: Thirtieth Ann. Rept. Dept. Geology and Nat. Res. Indiana, 1905, 

 pp. 275-314. 



Discusses briefly the topography, drainage, both glacial and postglacial, and general glacial history of Allen 

 County and the sand and gravel deposits in their generic relations. Describes in detail the workable deposits of 

 gravel. 

 Ramsey, A. C, On the glacial origin of certain lakes, etc.: Quart. Jour. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 18, 1862, pp. 185-204. 

 Also Am. Jour. Sci., 2d ser., vol. 35, 1863, pp. 324-345. 



Notes the abundance of lakes in glaciated regions, and shows that some of them are in rock basins apparently 

 excavated by ice. 

 Rice, T. D., and Futen, E. O. See Fippen and Rice. 



and Geib, W. J. See Geib and Rice. 



Ries, Heinrich, Clays and shales of Michigan: Michigan Geol. Survey, vol. 8, pt. 1, 1900, pp. 1-67. 



Includes tests and uses of surface clays and glacial clays as well as of shales. 

 Rominger, Carl, Geology of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan: Michigan Geol. Survey, vol. 3, 1873-1876, pp. 1-22. 



Thinks that glacial deposits were acted on by floods and floating ice late in the glacial epoch. 

 Roy, Thomas, On the ancient state of the North American continent: Proc. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 2, 1837, 

 pp. 537-538. 



Refers all the ten-aces and gravelly ridges from the level of Lake Ontario up to 1,000 feet above sea to the action 

 of a great lake. 

 Russell, I. O, Sand bars in Lake Michigan and arms of the Great Lakes and of their hydrographic basins: Geologic 

 history of Lake Lahontan: Mon. U. S. Geol. Survey, vol. 11, 1885, pp. 92-93. 



• Geologic history of the Laurentian basin: Jour. Geology, vol. 1, 1893, pp. 394-408. 



A discussion of the problems connected with the Great Lakes. 



■ Geography of the Laurentian basin: Bull. Am. Geog. Soc, vol. 30, 1898, pp. 226-254. 



Presents a review of the glacial history of the Great Lakes region. 



