498 JOURNAL, BOMBAY JSATUBAL HIST. SOCIETY, Vol. XXVIl. 



13. On page 622, line 29, after " hyaline ", add " Apices of wings of male, 

 ■often diflfusely dark brown." 



Vol. XXVI. 



14. Page 142, lines 27 and 35, for " distal " read " proximal ". 



15. Page 143, the wings shown are those of Lathrecista asiatica and not 

 those of Lyriothemis cleis. 



16. Page 144, the wings shown are those of Lyriothemis cleis and not those 

 of Potomarcha obscura. 



17. Page 145, line 15, for "no" read " only very occasionally ". 



18. Page 146, the wings shown are of Potomarcha obscura and not those 

 •of Lathrecista asiatica. 



19. On page 147, hne 15, for " femorse ", read " femora ", and on lines 

 48 and 49, for " simularis ", read " simulans ". 



20. On page 156, line 32, for "1st and 2nd ", read " 2nd and 3rd ". 



21. On page 491, after Une 4, put : — 



" Brachydiplax indica, Kirby. 

 Brachydiplax gestroi, Selys, Odonates des Birmanie." 



22. In the fig. on page 494, the final antenodal nervure in the forewing, 

 •should be shown incomplete. 



23. On page 497, line 49, for " interior " read " anterior ". 



24. On page 505, line 50, delete " Western ", and for " Bombay ", read 

 " Assam ". 



25. Pages 516 and 517, for " erythoea " read " erythrsea ". 



26. On page 929, delete Ime 23. 



Finally I must correct a statement made in the introduction to the sub- 

 family Libellulinse on page 613 of Vol. XXV. Here I mentioned that the order 

 adopted by Dr. Ris in his exhaustive work on the subfamily, was more for 

 the sake of convenience in classification than for any natural philogenetic 

 sequence. 



This is not so and it is extremely probable that Dr. Ris has followed very 

 ■closely the actual Une of evolution pursued by these insects. 



[To be continued.) 



