1893. J . 177 



" 1284— SUBSEQTJANA Hw. Lep. Br. p. 448 {non HS.) ; ? Stepli. 111. IV. 136 ; 

 ? Wd. 1021 ; monticolana Dup. IV. 83. 3 ; Hein. 235 ; montanana 

 Dup. IV. 83. 7 ; HS. 193 ; alpestrana HS. IV. p. 260 ; ? plumbagana 

 Wlk. 107 ; ? Stt. Man. 2. 215." 



Steganopttcha subsequana, Hw. 

 Tortrix suhsequana, Hw., Lp. Br., 448 — 9 (1812). 

 := Grapholitha ahiegana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., IV, 409 — 10, pi. Ixxxiii, 



4 (1842). 

 = Asthenia pygmceana, Wilk., Br. Tortr., 215—6 (1859) ; Stn., Man., II, 247 

 (1859). 



Warren, Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIV, 6—8 (1887), having examined 

 Haworth's original specimens of subsequana in the British Museum, 

 found them to be identical with abiegana, Dp., and came to the con- 

 clusion that the pygmcBana of Wilk. and Stn. (oiec Hb.), was the same 

 species. The corrected synonymy of this species is therefore as fol- 

 lows : — 



1241— SUBSEQUANA, Hw., Lp. Br., 448—9 (1812) ; Stgr. & Wk. (partim) Cat. Lp. 

 Eur., II, No. 1284 (1871) ; Wrn., Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIV, 6—8 (1887) ; 

 Stn., Ent. Mo. Mag., XXIV, 8 (1887). 

 = abiegana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., IV, 409—10, pi. Ixxxiii, 4 (1842) ; 

 H.-S., Schm. Eur., IV, pi. xviii, 128 (1849) ; Stgr. & Wk., Cat. Lp. Eur., 

 II, No. 1241 (1871) ; abiegnana, Z., Stett. Ent. Zeit., 1849, 244; H.-S., 

 Schm. Eur., IV, 281 (1849) ; Hein., Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 217—8 (1863). 

 = pygmceana, Wilk., Br. Tortr., 215—6 (1859) ; Stn., Man., II, 247 (1859) ; 



Brt., Ent. Mo. Mag., X, 215 (1874). 

 9 =^ pygmtBana, Frol., Enum. Tortr. Wiirt., 90 — 1, No. 217 (1828), 



Steganoptycha mercueiana, Frol. 



Tortrix mercuriana, Frol., Enum. Tortr. Wurt., 73—4, No. 170 (1828) ; Hb., Tortr., 



322 (1831). 

 = Sericoris (Eudemis) subsequana, Stph., 111. Br. Ent., Haust. IV, 136 (1834) ; 



Wd., Ind. Ent., 1021 (1839). 

 = Coccyx monticolana, Dp., Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., Sppl., IV, 408 — 9, pi. Ixxxiii, 3 



(1842). 

 = Pamplusia alticolana, Stph., List. Br. An. B. M., X, Lp. 52, 100 (1852). 



Stephens, List Br. An. B. M., X, Lp. 52 (1852), referred his 

 Sericoris ? subsequana, as also Wood's figure 1021, to " monticola, Mn." 

 Wood's figure certainly represents ntonticolana (Mn. MS.), Dp., and 

 Stephens was probably correct in considering his subsequana to be the 

 same species. 



Coccyx monticolana, Dp., was erroneously considered by Heine- 

 mann, Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 235 (1863), as identical with alpestrana, 

 H.-S., and Staudinger and Wocke (Cat. Lp. Eur., No. 1284), thinking 



