THE SCHIZOPODA. 
I. Tue Orper MYSIDACEA. 
A. Susorprr LOPHOGASTRIDA. 
CHALARASPIS Wittemoiis-Sugm (1875). 
Description.— Integument soft. Carapace thin, submembranaceous, with- 
out processes, anteriorly produced as a very broad but somewhat short frontal 
plate (Plate 1, fig. la), and with the postero-lateral rounded wings reaching 
to the end of the thorax or a little more backwards; the cervical groove very 
strong. 
Eyes small, light reddish. Antennular peduncles (figs. la-1b) short and 
extremely thick; inner flagellum thin, about as long as the peduncle.— Antennal 
squama not jointed, with the outer margin serrate beyond the middle (fig. 1¢).— 
Maxillulae (fig. le) without palp and without setae or spines on the inner lobe.— 
Maxillae (fig. 1f) somewhat reduced; the lobe from second (1°) and third (1°) 
joint distally rounded, undivided; the palp (p) very short, unjointed, and scarcely 
marked off; the exopod strongly developed, very broad.— Maxillipeds (fig. 1g) 
with the exopod about as long as the endopod, which distally is a little broader 
than in Lophogaster. 
Gnathopods slightly shorter than the following pair of legs, shaped as in 
Lophogaster, with the seventh joint somewhat thick, a little curved, distally 
rounded, and strongly setose.— Legs somewhat slender, and the last pair (fig. 1i) 
considerably thinner than the first (fig. 1h) or second pair; claw long or very 
long, thin; exopod well developed in all pairs (the ovigerous female is unknown). 
Sixth abdominal segment with two pairs of acute teeth from the lateral 
margin (fig. 1k), but the segment is not divided into two sections by any suture. 
Uropods with the endopod slightly overreaching the telson and a little longer 
than the exopod, which is not jointed towards the end (fig. 11). Telson (fig. 11) 
oblong-triangular, with the narrow end truncate, with lateral spines, and a 
couple of dorsal keels. 
Remarks.— This genus is perhaps more allied and similar to Lophogaster 
M. Sars than to any other genus of the suborder; from the genus named it is, 
however, easily distinguished by the shape of the frontal plate, the reduced 
eyes, the less developed maxillae, the long uropods, ete. As to the use of the 
