188 THE SCHIZOPODA. 
North Coronado Island, California. Its distribution southward in the three 
large Oceans is still unknown. The majority of the localities enumerated 
in the literature by the authors until July 1905 for E. australis Dana certainly 
belong to E. unguiculata, but some among them to E. major or EF. australis, 
and all specimens referred before July 1895 to Z. australis should be reéxamined. 
The real FE. australis Dana is a very large Antarctic species. The species has, 
as far as I know, never been taken near the surface. 
¢ 
6. Eucopia major H. J. Hansen. 
1910. Eucopia major H. J. HANSEN, Siboga-Exp., 37, p. 21, pl. 1, figs. 4a—4b. 
Sta. 4645. Nov. 8, 1904. Lat. 3 °37.6’ S., long. 89° 43.1’ W. 1955 fms.,trawl. 1 specimen (only a 
fragment). 
Sta. 4651. Nov. 11,1904. Lat. 5° 41.7’S., long. 82° 59.7’ W. 2222 fms., trawl. 2 specimens. 
Sta. 4742. Feb. 15, 1905. Lat. 0°3.4’ N., long. 117° 15.8’ W. 2320 fms., trawl. 1 specimen. 
Remarks.— This species was established on a badly preserved female with 
marsupium secured by the “‘Siboga”’ and measuring 42 mm. in length. The 
specimens from the Pacific are also badly preserved; a male, from Sta. 4651, 
is 58 mm. long, and a female, from Sta. 4742, with the marsupial plates perhaps 
not fully developed is even about 60.5 mm. But I am inclined to think that 
these specimens had been a little shorter in the living state than in their present 
bad and seemingly extended condition. 
The species is easily separated from EF. unguiculata by its much larger size, 
the largest specimen recorded of the last-named species was only 38 mm., and 
especially by having its short eyes looking forwards, occupying less than one 
fourth of the outer margin of the whole appendage (stalk + cornea), while in 
E. unguiculata the cornea looks in the main outwards and occupies more than 
one third, frequently about two fifths, of the same outer margin. 2. major 
is readily distinguished from EZ. australis Dana by having the terminal joint 
of the exopod of the uropods distinetly broader than long, while in 2. australis 
it is longer than broad; besides the eye-stalks are proportionately longer and 
narrower in £. australis than in E. major. 
Distribution — A single specimen was captured in the Indian Archipelago 
by the ‘‘Siboga,” and in 1910 some specimens were secured by the Prince 
of Monaco in the Atlantic West of Southern Spain. In 1906 Ortmann enumer- 
ated six localities in the North Pacifie northwards to Lat. 56° 12’ N. and one 
locality in the West Indies for 2. australis, but as 2. australis Dana is an Ant- 
arctic species his determinations cannot be correct. As he had separated Z&. 
unguiculata from his EF. australis I think that the specimens from his seven 
