ET, 35.) TO J. D. HOOKER. 337 
by the Edinburgh Town Council. Such defeats ean 
do you no harm. I suppose you are now going on 
with the ‘ Flora Antarctica.” I need not say that I 
should be very glad to see the Antarctic plants of the 
Wilkes Expedition in your hands. The botanist who 
accompanied the expedition is no doubt perfectly in- 
competent to the task, so greatly so that probably he 
has but a remote idea how incompetent he is. I have 
not seen him nor the plants. Certainly I would not 
touch them (any but the Oregon and Californian) if 
they were offered to me, which they are not likely to 
be. I consider myself totally incompetent to do such 
a work without making it a special study for some 
years, and going abroad to study the collections ac- 
cumulated in Europe. Of course if they are worked 
up at all in this country, they will be done disgrace- 
fully. I publicly expressed my opinion on the sub- 
ject in “ Silliman’s Journal.” But I have long been 
convinced that nothing can be done. The whole busi- 
ness has been in the hands till now of Senator ; 
the most obstinate, wrong-headed, narrow-minded, im- 
practicable ignoramus that could well be found. . . . 
If to this you add an utter ignorance of those prin- 
ciples of comity and the spirit of interchange that 
prevail among naturalists, and a total want of com- 
prehension of what is to be done in the scientific 
works in question, and you will see that nothing is to 
be expected from such sources. They have thrown 
every obstacle they could in the way of their natu- 
ralists, — Dana and Pickering, for instance, —so much 
so that Pickering, though a patient man, once threw 
up his position in disgust, I have heard, but, by some 
concessions made to him, was finally persuaded to 
retain it. 
