566 
~ 
JOHN F. HAYFORD 
pahgre, namely, between —3’93 and +5755 is also large, 9748. 
Evidently the factors given as examples by Mr. Lewis on p. 617 
did not produce the results expected by him. 
LONGITUDE STATION No 1 
Point ARENA, CAL. 
LATITUDE STATION No. 54 
UNCOMPAHGRE, COLO. 
RING 
Lewis Lewis Hayford 
=, M=.9 M=t.o0 
hi=19.29 hir=19.29 Ax=113.7 
BO rns + "o2 "02 + 02 
PANO 8 ROE + .04 + .04 + .04 
2 OR aren aera + .04 -- .04 + .04 
Ns abo a pti = .05 a> Oy SI 65 
DOR ee nee + .02 + .02 + .02 
De rast ae tee + .02 + .02 + .02 
DAR in uenscnpeteg: + .o1 + .or + .o1 
Dia At nee Nee he + .I0 a al0) + .10 
DD arene + .12 + .12 + .13 
2 Tee nsaee eee eke ae cit Ss ital + .16 
JOM ieee —- 04 ae ig) Ae alk 
LO Rey ereee + .22 +--+ .19 + .25 
Gin eey erceae AP 325 = 20 a2) a0) 
ait 1 at ene + .28 + 21 + .34 
TO Wes setae, = cts AQ eo lio eet hg 7 are oS 
SEG ieee i enna te a OO SaaS See ty) 
TAIN ore nna has i. 34 =P oS +1.69 
he Tae +2-11 + .66 +2.42 
aD Dis enla sh erenea +2.50 + .68 +2.46 
i ea ts + 3.01 + .70 +2.11 
EO Sey pees ++ 2.90 ae OR +1.34 
ONE C a RauCO +3.01 + .62 + .83 
Sikes +4.59 += 05 a og 
hee Hosea Stan 2 ae O5 + .38 
A Ot vatronay nee a OS = O2 + .20 
Bie ee cae +4.66 ape 03 + .09 
A eels coe +5.04 +1.01 =O 
Brae eee, ano? =[-L00 =| aO2 
OW aM Sneed +4.09 + .82 + lor 
5 RD eRe ae tr +2.81 + ..56 + .o1 
Motalewer aoe | +53.73. | +13.06 | +15.67* 
Lewis 
M=.5 
hi=19.29 
fe eae ae 
COM Sm. 15 
om Wrap H ON 
NW WwW 
N Dw 
oO OA 
now 
+++4++ +41 
Pole IE eel 
wn wPhOnn 
b CO Onn PO 
| 
NS 
wn Ow 
PRR 
OOS, 
Ont no 
SIU NTU 
Lewis 
M=.09 
hi:=19.29 
af 
So 
bo 
Lal 
MEST eal lege 
& BS 
Hb bh O 
DO com 
& - 
a nN 
oH 
OoOOn 
cB iets 
fe) 
fa 
TaD 
aa 
.00 
.08 
— .06 
—.12 
—.16 
—.27 
—.AI 
—.51 
AP oS 
Hayford 
M=1.0 
retell 
i) 
NI 
+4++4+4+ 44114 4144+ 4+ 
| 
fx=113.7 
29 
B22 
nity 
.07 
.03 
.06 
.36 
TAT 
220 
.85 
.19 
33 
AS 
7 
.O4 
3 2B 
sats 
.0O 
.03 
.OL 
-O1 
OL 
-OL 
.0O 
.OL 
sie S esse 
*The slight discrepancies, too small to be of any consequence, between these totals and those 
printed on p. 55 of The Figure of the Earth and Isostasy are due to the effects of omitted decimal places. 
Possibly it might be said by Mr. Lewis that this failure to 
secure a close agreement is due to having made so great a reduction 
in the assumed completeness of compensation as to much more than 
counteract the reduction in the assumed depth of compensation. 
Accordingly the middle column has been inserted in the above 
