school, 130; his Zero, 249, 424; 
theoretical and practical mind, 
322; triplicity, 322; its rhyth- 
mical repetition, 326; difference 
from Herbart’s, 326; fundamen- 
tal schema, 330; views of the 
Absolute, 447. 
Herbart, his triplicity differs from 
Hegel’s, 326; views of the Abso- 
lute, 443. 
Hobbes’s solution of “Achilles and 
the tortoise,”’ 255. 
Holy Spirit revealed to Conscious- 
ness, 191. 
Hope, 124. 
Idea, of the Conscious-forms more 
definite than of matter, 161; sen- 
sual, most familiar, 204; of proof, 
216; a primary class of exist- 
tence, 423; distinguished from 
Principle, 426; only secondarily 
representative, 431; of the Cre- 
ator, represented in the Universe, 
431. 
Ideal relations fixed and necessary, 
125; the foundation of reality, 
431. 
Idealism of Descartes and Berkeley 
rejected by Kant, 403; SO, 437. 
Ideality, 124. ; 
Idee of Hegel, three manifestations 
of, 17, 20, 333. 
Identification, of Substance with 
Deity, 375; with the Absolute, 
452. 
Identity of will and law, 298. 
Images, not entities, 185; we see 
ourselves, not our images, 185. 
Imagination, 106, 124. 
Imitation, 124. 
Immortality, part of the subject- 
matter of philosophy, 324. 
Impenetrability, an essential attri- 
bute of matter, 129. 
Imperfection and liberty proved by 
error, 182. 
Imponderable agents, forms of 
Force, 269; used by man, 296. 
Impulse, 322. 
Tnelination, 322. 
GENERAL INDEX. 
Incomprehensibility of God, 236, 
457. 
Inconceivable, not necessarily false, 
264. 
Inconsistency, often merely imagi- 
nary, 240. . 
Indefinite and Infinite, Hamilton’s 
views criticized, 453. 
Individuality, 124; a momentum 
of the Idee, 330. 
Indubitable truths in metaphysics 
as well as in mathematics, 208. 
Inertia, perhaps accidental, 129. 
Infinite, ambiguity of the term, 
254, 408; its customary mean- , 
ing, 254; examples of relative 
infinites, 256; dangers of falla- 
cy in reasoning from relative to 
absolute infinites, 261;  illus- 
trated by Hamilton’s ‘contradic- 
tions,” 261; more certain than 
the finite, 452; and Indefinite, 
Hamilton’s views criticized, 458 ; 
may be self-limited, 456. 
Infinity, relative and absolute, 254 
sqq; of space, time, and position, 
410; identified with space, by 
Philo and others, 411; may be 
partially represented by the finite, 
455. 
Inflexibility, 124. 
Inquisitiveness, 124. 
Tnsight, 124. 
Inspiration, the basis of knowledge, 
4; giveth understanding, 4, 96; 
of primitive beliefs, 191. 
Instinct, 43; defined, 56, 59. 
Instinctive belief in Authority, 
205. 
Intellectual classification desirable, 
435. 
Intelligence, 1, 17; the highest 
unity, 14, 274; high rank of, 
287; not a resultant of material 
organization, 289; human, su- 
bordinate to a higher, 290; su- 
premacy of, 291; creates neces- 
sity, 293 ; association with nature, 
321; theoretical mind, 522; 
points to an infallible Wisest, 
458. 
587 
Intrepidity, 124. 
Intuition, 322; RMR, 110; sym- 
bolical analysis of, 122. 
Invention, typical of creation, 431. 
Investigation, impossibility of tho- 
rough, 197. 
Irresistible opinion, a revelation, 
196. 
Isolated facts, uninteresting and 
unprofitable, 136. 
Jacobi, primitive beliefs, inspira- 
tions, 191; identity of will and 
law, 303; faith the element of 
knowledge, 319; triplicity of 
philosophy, 319. 
Job, inspiration giveth understand- 
ing, 4, 96; incomprehensibility 
of God, 236. 
Jouffroy, the personal faculty, 66. 
Judgement, 43; RS, 74, 82; de- 
fined, 82 sqq; differs from En- 
ergy, how, 92; examples of er- 
roneous, 178 sgqg; a source of 
error, 183; immediate, neces- 
sary, 197; ultimate, somewhat 
voluntary, 197. 
Kant, definition of perception, 77 ; 
Judgment, 85; modified the sig- 
nification of Transcendentalism, 
130; taught that there could be 
antagonisms of Reason, 244; 
his Antinomies relate to the 
Absolute, 247; Antinomies, 247, 
252, 259; Transcendental Phi- 
losophy, 275; led to Triplicity 
through duality, 305; triplicity 
of the soul and of philosophy, 
817, 325; started from the sub- 
jective, 834; only commenced 
his method, 335; discovered no 
reason for the number of catego- 
ries, 3863; categorical, subjec- 
tive, and conditional forms of his 
categories, 366 ; dealt only with 
subjective space and time, 387 ; 
his doctrine of space quoted, 
388 ; admits empirical reality of 
space and time, 399; but denies 
their absolute reality, 399 ; grants 
them the same reality as other 
objects of knowledge, 400; con- 
