368 SECTIONAL TRANSACTIONS.—C. 
between the two faunas. It is suggested that the Yarmouth Beds correlate 
with the only comparable horizon known in the Cromer district—marine 
sands occurring near West Runton. ‘These sands have been reported to lie 
between the Contorted Drift Boulder Clay and the gravels belonging to 
the ‘Upper Chalky’ glaciation. This correlation, however, leaves no 
room for the equivalent of the Chalky-Jurassic Boulder Clays in the Cromer 
sections. 
Mr. H. E. Forrest. 
The several glaciations of Norfolk, the directions from which the ice 
came in each case, and their effect upon the habitability of particular areas 
by Palzolithic man. 
Mr. J. E. SAINTY. 
In view of the difficulties which the problem of distinguishing between 
the different glacial gravels has presented to the geologist, Dr. Solomon’s 
claim to differentiate between these deposits on purely geological grounds 
will receive a warm welcome. The implement evidence, so far as it is 
available, accords well with Solomon’s conclusions. 5 
The complex mixture of pre-Crag industries is being studied by Mr. Reid 
Moir, but the more uniform conditions of staining in the Norfolk Stone Bed 
appear less helpful than those of Suffolk, and classification depends rather 
on considerations of technique ; it appears on the whole, that the Stone Bed 
is of rather later date than the Suffolk Bone Bed. 
The rich Chellian fauna of the Cromer Forest Beds is unfortunately 
accompanied by only scanty artefact remains, the most important specimens 
being those obtained from the overlying Till. The association of hand-axes 
with elephant suggest that Pleistocene and Early (?) Chellian are preferable 
to Pliocene and Pre-Chellian. 
The ‘ cold interglacial ’ intervening between the Till and Norwich Brick 
Earth and the Chalky Boulder Clay has in Norfolk produced no decisive 
evidence of human occupation. Developed Acheulian-Clactonian industries 
appear above the Chalky Boulder Clay, whilst ‘ Levallois’ influence is clearly 
present ; the recent find of a magnificent Combe Capelle specimen in the 
topmost gravel of Mousehold Heath accords with this. ‘ Little Eastern’ 
deposits have produced numerous specimens from the Cromer-Holt ridge, 
Syderstone and Massingham. Upper Paleolithic material found 7m situ is 
scanty indeed, though some of the surface finds would, on grounds of 
technique, appear to be Aurignacian, whilst the very rich Mesolithic 
industries show definite Aurignacian influence. 
Dr. J. D. SoLomMon. 
The greatest difficulty confronting the archeologist in East Anglia is 
the doubtful position of the Chellian industry. The isolated specimen 
found by Mr. Sainty in the Cromer Till is the only unabraded example of 
this industry known in East Anglia, and appears to indicate an age not very 
different from that of the Forest Bed. 
On the other hand, the Stone Bed industry from the base of the Crag 
and Forest Bed is not markedly of Chellian type, but seems rather to indicate 
crude attempts to produce points and edges in the simplest possible way, 
using flint nodules as a starting point. 
There is a great hiatus between this industry and the next which is 
found definitely in situ, namely a fairly advanced Acheulian ; this hiatus 
appears to be due to the fact that there are no deposits belonging to the 
