D)'. Henry Woodward — Cretaceous Crustacea, Denmark. 495 



the protogastric lobes, which are pointed downwards and inwards. 

 This is probably a variety of B. rxigosa. (Segerberg, op. cit., 1900, 

 pi. i, fiff. 2.) 



(7) Forma nodosa, large, with its middle lobes much accentuated 

 and elevated (particularly the posterior part of the mesogastric lobe 

 and the inner half of the antero-branchial regions) ; the protogastric 

 lobes on the antero-lateral border are also elevated. (K. 0. Segerberg, 

 op. cit., 1900, pi. i, fig. 12.) 



Dromiopsis minor, Von Fischer-Benzon, sp. 



1866. Dromia minor, Von Fischer-Benzon: Alter d. Faxekalkes, p. 25, pi. iii, 



figs. 4-6. 



1867. ,, ,, Lundgren : Faxekalken, p. 11. 



1900. ,, ,, K. 0. Segerberg : Geol. Foren. I Stockholm Forhandl., 



Bd. xxii, H. 5, pi. i, fig. 14. 



Circumference nearly round; the breadth is to the length as 

 16 : 15 ; the arching is fairly uniform all over, but a little flatter 

 posteriorly. The size varies from 15 to 27 mm. in breadth. The 

 rostrum is broad, triangular, and not so much depressed as in 

 D. rugosa. The lateral margins are evenly curved ; the antero-lateral 

 margin begins close to and on the same level as the inferior orbital 

 border, and has 5-6 short conical teeth, generally well separated. 

 The postero-lateral margin anteriorly is marked by a tooth. The 

 posterior margin is longer and less curved than in D. rugosa. 

 The occipital furrow is fairly deep, forming an angular bend on the 

 pterygostomial region. Lateral furrow shallow. The different 

 regions much less prominent than in the preceding species. The 

 cardiac region is defined anteriorly by a fine straight line. 



The superior surface sparsely provided with small, mostly pointed 

 tubercles, forming a row on each side of the lateral furrow. The 

 cardiac region and the postero-branchial lobes are provided with 

 much fewer tubercles, or they are absent altogether. In other 

 respects it corresponds with D. rugosa. 



This species, described by Von Fischer-Benzon, was by him 

 supposed to be identical with D. mimita of Eeuss.^ The description 

 by Eeuss, however, is very vague, difliering little from D. elegans as 

 this species is described and illustrated by Reuss~ himself, and 

 it is therefore probably only a form of this very variable species 

 from which he has formed his description. 2). minuta, Eeuss, 

 ought thus to be abolished. 



jD. minor appears rarely both at Annetorp and at Faxe. 



Dromiopsis elegans, Steenstr. et Forchh., sp. 



? Bromilites elegans {elegantulus), Steenstr. et Forchh. MS. 



1859. Dromiopsis elegans, Eeuss: Fossil. Krabben, p. 15, pi. iv, figs. 1, 2. 



1859. Dromiopsis minufa (?), Eeuss: Fossil. Krabben, p. 13, pi. iv, fig. 3. 



1866. Dromia elegans, A^on Fischer-Benzon : Alter d. Faxekalkes, p. 26, pi. iv, 



tig. 2. 



1867. ,, ,, Lundgren: Faxekalken, p. 11. 



1900. ,, ,, K. 0. Segerberg: Geol. Foren. I Stockholm Forhandl., 



Bd. xxii, H. 5, pi. i, figs. 16, 18, 19. 



1 Eeuss : Fossil. Krabben, p. 13, pi. iv, fig. 3. 



2 Op. cit., p. 15, pi. iv, figs. 1, 2. 



