TRUBNER & CO’S MONTHLY LIST. 59 
a 
THE FRENCH DICTIONARY FOR TOURISTS. 
" Roan, with tuck, 10s. 6d. 
f 
32mo, with Four Maps, &c, 
Morocco, with tuck, 125. 6d, 
| a BELLOWS’ 
POCKET FRENCH DICTIONARY. 
TWENTIETH THOUSAND OF THE SECOND EDITION. 
-_ “As complete a Dictionary of the French. and English languages 
Jished.”— TIMES. 
THE SCOTSMAN. 
**The smallest, the most portable, and the 
best printed Dictionary of the French and 
English languages we have ever seen. CEE 
‘The vocabulary abounds in translations of 
ie expressions which cannot be always 
literally rendered, and of new words and 
| not found anywhere else. [Here fol- 
low examples. ] And so we might 
‘go on without intermission, Alling a whole 
Sco/sman with words and idiomatic phrases 
not to be found in any other Dictionary ; but 
‘what would be the good of it? Let the reader 
buy this little work, compare it with any large 
and pretentious Dictionary he may happen to 
possess, and he will soon see the superiority of 
‘the booklet we are criticising. . . The author 
has written and published a Pocket Engiish- 
French Dictionary detter than any book of this 
kind ever published in Great Britain, and 
superior to any Pocket Dictionary edited and 
printed zx any country in Lurope.” 
5 
THE GRAPHIC. 
“It is a marvellous specimen of typography, 
and is at once ¢he smallest and the most com- 
prehensive of pocket Dictionaries. [Here fol- 
low details.] We observe a happy blending 
of the author with the printer, the result being 
a valuable contribution to philological litera- 
& ° 
| oo 
has ever been pub- 
ture. The author has done his work with the 
utmost care, the most abstruse words being 
faithfully translated, even to the various shapes 
of a sail or forms of a knot. As for the 
printer’s labours, they cannot be too highly 
praised.” 
THE SPECTATOR. 
‘Not only a Dictionary which, as a Pocket 
Dictionary, is without a rival, but one which 
would. be remarkable among Dictionaries of 
any size for the novelties introduced in both 
matter and arrangement. We now 
come to an alteration which, more perhaps 
than any other, distinguishes the present vo- 
lume from all previous works of the kind. 
Hitherto it has been the fashion in all bi- 
lingual Dictionaries to put the two divisions, 
one at the beginning and the other at the end 
of the work, a practice in which one lexico- 
grapher has sedulously followed in the foot- 
steps of another. [The author] has struck out 
of the beaten track, and placed the two divi- 
sions on the same page, so that one alpha- 
betical arrangement does for both, thus saving 
the perpetual waste of time caused under the 
old system by turning to the ‘wrong end’ of 
the Dictionary. Another admirable 
idea is that of printing all substantives in 
capitals ; masculine nouns in ordinary capi- 
tals, feminine in italics. 
London: TRUBNER & CO., Ludgate Hill. 
