THE AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE. 
REPORTS OF THE HARVEST. 
FROM OUR OWN CORRESPONDENTS, 
‘ COUNTY. 
x 7 
n Average, and of first 
East LOTHIAN quality 
i Very well 
= m 25 Average 
ae Full average 
ee Below 5 
g — 7 "e Defici 
i dant: -| 1-3d less than “last year 
— 55 : Under average 
SELKIRKSHIRE p pete e 
2 Aver 
eee Average 
. III 
x $ j Hardly average 
Full average 
i 3 
H e ee ” Good 
3 bac ey 
— 
2 
2 
. 
Prom well 
The rang 0 wn is in- 
mildew 
Not so good aa: ‘it pro- 
Bel 
8 but badly har- 
e 
Not so 
J. 2.8rds 
Lach to 1-3rd below an 
WHEAT, 
1- thors cage N 
Som HES deficient 
ective 
e, average 
Fu on rage 
As good as dans year 
Promises well 
tipini ears 
Heder: saaie 
11 
Not we 
Under awe 
Good 
Under average 
jured by 
Lig ht 
Scarcely average 
Much Riders average 
As last 
miadi but fair 
Bad 
w average 
veste 
Under si 
Not an averag 
Full average. 
Not full average 
— f — 
e 
3 deficient 
der average 
good as last year 
None Baa threshed 
Very bad 
me ascertained 
not yet say 
Noting — last year 
erage 
Not — A 
Hardly average 
tile — —— . 
8 
Under average 
Much . last year 
Spro 
magere yielded 
Bad, an ine saved in 
wretched order 
of an average 
OATS. 
— ħĖįÁ 
verage 
Lothe go a 
Full average 
Exe —— 
arious 
Large erop 
Good 
Average 
Promise well 
Good 
Average 
Yields well 
Good 
Under mg 
Averag 
Abundan 
Remarkably pout 
* ene 
pee 
wail 
vient andl “he 
Ve g ihe 
Good 
— 
de ot nea 
etn i 
rage 
1-3d ander average 
Average 
Not half an average 
Average 
Barely average 
— * 
— 
BARLEY, 
POTATOES, 
Average 
Average 
Average 
Various 
Hardly average 
Large crop 
Good 
Rather under 
Promising 
Over average 
Average 
Good average 
Over average 
Full average 
Very good 
Good 
Inferi 
Better than expected 
Small average 
Various 
Promises well 
Not average 
trasse 
CTET 
eseese 
Improved 
Under average 
72 ** 
Under 
Much under average 
Below average 
Stained, but good 
Middling 
Average 
Nearly average 
* Err Une 1845 
Complaints increasing 
y little dise ase 
5 ing generally 
Little disease 
= Ar 
Fair crop, but disease progresses rapidly 
Disease at prensas but moderate ; ; crop nearly 
and abundant 
Pinta: general, but slight 
Disease TOY ray rapidly 
Half t 
Average; erde appeared lately 
Disease genera al, but not virulent 
Some 
Ha pe ry an aver age e 
Partly diseased ; not so bad as 1846 
etting worse daily 
Abundant ; but 3 — diseased 
Half th : five times the 
pro 
Small erop, but — ask’ hard! t all diseased 
Very good in quality, and of fair qu Bal 
air crop, rogue. somey dise: 
rage erop 
Quite an average 
Abundant both a 
complai ints 
ar P, 
e, ‘ne arth, damaged 
T Yall crop, mostly all infected 
Half gvod 
robs 
A good meisg very badly diseased 
Good ; and, a epti og rumours, free from disease 
verage ; 
Good ; but one-fourth = the good ones 
Not one-fiftieth 80 good crop ; diseased 
Under average; one-seventh disease d 
Haulm three mee? pee disease worse than 
At present bed. at 8 one-third and 
u 
Not average, and half diseased 
isease now subsided 
One-third o ate are saved 
Very bad, eal — din fast 
Th of 25 average 
ree- four Mi 
One-third of an average 
r than was expected 
Over average: ia half destroyed 
ery bad 
Th f 
keping 2 
sed: 
Less than Se are su 
Five acres produced 3 ke of Enes ; 
jt pt 
svar 
Tw hirds 2 are bad 
veep = — — and e eatable 
erage; ror pons increased 
Bebel ent 
ve . 
Abun 
lOne-fourth t a p7 Sd — but an extensive crop 
Very bad : half diseased 
Yields well, but not a halt . sound 
1845 or 1846 
Very or produce of very small — and 
well 
mostly diseased 
cane turn out very 
A good crop ; . 
year 
A P ; two-thirds gone or going 
Worse than any previous year 
More than half dise 
V. d on wet or rich clays 
Never worse 
o-thirds diseased > 
Very vai ; ly not half a crop 
ro bad, and 3 worse 
A gemma ok a 
igh one-third of an average © crop 
Marge e largely diseased 
Half ot an inferior 
holly unfit f 
The Bidii — generally y dend, p yon as bad 
Half a crop, Pt te of which ie diseased 
Far worse than on any previous year 
From ome to the —— 1 
ook — 
8 
oSA —— 
Gnefourth left, bet disease still active 
Generally not more than the seed left, 
Almost 
Hardly worth digging 
Not worth digging 
Very bad indeed 
Very bad and very rotten 
ery 
bad in quantity 
Very bad 
in 
4s 
K Q 
S. 
A fall 3 much diseased, 1 to keep 5 
NAME AND ADDRESS. 
W. Berwick, St. Andrew's 
J. MELVIN, Ratho 
G. Horx, Fenton Barns. 
J. Bruce, Preston-kirk 
ALEX. Loan, Humbalt 
R. HUNTER, Coldstrea ane 
J. THOMSON, St. Boswell’s: 
J. 3. oner, Dilston 
ick 
—— Alnwick 
W. 1 Neweastle 
T. S. ColnECk, E. Denton 
S. RIGG Wigton 
u h Thore 
W. mer 5 1 ee age 
W. TURNER 
Dusk, — 
J. ROBINSON, Brough 
T. Dixon, Darlington 
J. PrrestmMan, Pickering 
H. J. TORN NER, Richmond 
Thirsk 
. M. MILBURN, 
J. TURNER, Bedale 
P.STEVENSON, near Thirsk: 
E. Dawson, Lancaster 
Eel 
$ 
5 
i 
. . Miwon, Marka Draytom 
J A. A, 
ev, 
. . 
N. che 
— 
ya 
5 
is] 
. 
8 22-908 A = 
nw 2 z: 
E. 8 G, Eye 
J. G. eee, — 
bap N, Debe 
T. L. ales 
C. HILLYARD, men 
W. GREY, Courteen 
W. Fancount, Lmpingham. 
S. CUREETHAM, Oakham 
J. BUCKLEY, Loughborough} 
J. BaRBURT, Kenilworth 
ee 
tee Blakemore 
Worin koa, ape PE, 
E J. Browse, Br 
RchAs, Monmouth 
G. R. RELPH, Cefn-ila, Usk- 
J. HUNT, Al 
A. HEARN, Isle of Wight 
J. Eames, Beaulicu 
J. D. NICHOLSON, Beaulieu 
R, Southampton 
B. 3 — 12 
G. BROWN, Avebury 
T. ASKELL, Swindon 
B. BAILEY, Calne 
J. FURMEDGE, Beaminster 
J. LuckgAx, "Dorchester 
W. BARTLETT, Blandford 
