THE FOREST-BED OF EAST ANGLIA. 99 
a point on the beam opposite the distal end of the base of the second tine is about 
7 inches; and from the posterior edge of the burr, in a straight line, about 19 inches. 
Opposite the back-tine, the beam is 2°] inches in greatest dorso-ventral diameter; and 
it is still 1:9 inches thick, becoming flat above, but remaining convex below, at a point 
9 inches above the middle of the base of the tine. The front edge of the antler is 
wanting from a point 6°5 inches above the tine ¢, and for 11 inches from its lower end 
the fractured edge varies from 1:4 to 1°7 inches in thickness. Posteriorly the edge has 
been getting thinner from the back-tine, about 10 inches above which it expands into 
a large palmated crown, the plane of which is different from that of the part which 
precedes it. The beam, from the second tine to the base of the palmation, was extended 
upwards in a plane about 45° from the median vertical plane, its edge being seen in a 
view of the skull from the front. The posterior edge of the crown is, on the contrary, 
rotated outwards and downwards, so that much of its lower surface becomes visible from 
in front. The posterior edge of the base of the crown is very concaye, and passes 
obliquely upwards and backwards, the palmation extending further backwards than the 
end of the back-tine. The crown is quite complete except in front, and is everywhere 
thin, scarcely exceeding an inch in thickness in any part; its distal border is gently 
scalloped, about 7 points or rounded lobes being distinguishable, none of them being 
more than mere denticulations. The thinness of the palmated crown at its antero- 
distal extremity indicates that no other tines were present in this region. The part 
between the main palmation and the back-tine is, however, thick (1:7 inches) on its 
fractured anterior border ; and another anterior tine may have been present in this 
region, or the beam may have terminated in a distinct point, as in the Belzig specimen 
(see woodcut, p. 104), mentioned below, or as in C. dama. From a comparison with 
the latter, I do not, however, think it likely that an anterior tine was present. 
The right antler agrees closely with the left, except that the region above the second 
tine turns dorsally much more sharply than that of the other side. It is indeed almost 
at right angles to the beam, whereas that of the left side forms a much more open 
curve with the beam. ‘The first and second tines agree almost exactly in position with 
those of the left side, but the second tine is much better represented, measuring 7:5 
inches in length and being practically complete. At its base it is flattened and is a 
good deal broader than thick (breadth 2°8 inches, thickness 1-5inches). ‘The back-tine 
is lost. The anterior edge of the antler is complete for about 13:5 inches (measured 
round the curve) above the base of the second tine, and the antler is prolonged for 
another 10 inches above the point where the anterior edge ceases to be complete. Its 
thinness makes it practically certain that no other tine could have existed. 
The part of the skull which is preserved measures 9 inches in greatest length, 
and extends as far forwards as the posterior portion of the orbit. The occipital 
region and the base of the skull are in good condition. ‘The interval between the 
