PHYLOGENY OF THE PALZOGNATHZ AND NEOGNATHA, 265 
Fig. 10. 
Pid 
ff Passeres 
‘Trogones 
Colii 
Coraciss 
Alcedines Bucerotes 
Caprimulgi | " Accipitres 
nN | Cuculi Ciconis A Columbee 
Striges we N BS i # Pterocles 
7" — \ Zz Cypseli Steganopodes / Alcides 
N SS y 4 
Y — iS | = 
. SN Musophagi 4 fi 
ete N \\ IP 4 i Limicole. 
~ ~~ \V ¥ H 
~ ~ f ’ 
Palamides\ /f 
Anseres iN ( Gruides 
Q WH Rallid 
= A ide 
meeeeooee vrs} Z S._ Rhinochetides 
[f omnithes \ Eurypygide 
y Y Mesitides 
4) bs SS 
7 A 
jj EB a Cariamidss 
jij 3 
4 A 
yf F Tubinares 
NG 
0 [| === Colymbt (including Hesperomnis) 
p 
S 
SSS 
u YQ 
/ yy Sphenisci 
Dinornithes 
f Jae 
/ Y FEpyornithes 
Lo 
ED 4 < 
LF o oo 
“a 7 
Zi“ <A 
Apteryges 
' 
' 
1 
1 
\ 
Phylogenetic diagram showing the probable Relationships of the Paleo- and Neognathe. 
|||] = Paleognathine stock. 38 = Eutaxic forms. @Z = Diastataxic forms. 
Blank branches indicate eutaxic forms amongst a diastataxic group; blank spaces in a branch that both 
eu- and diastataxic forms oceur in the same genus or family, 
