412 PRIMITIVE HISTORY OF THE lONIANS. 



II. 



Urukh. Uranus. Ja'axlviueel. Erclioas=Atlior = Seb. 



An or Onnos. 



Sem, Semempses or Sempliuci-ates. Jadag, Ptali. 



Antseus or Entef . Amcliura, SlioiireorB;isiris = Phiala=^7?iz«m. JatJier. Janias 

 I I I orTankera, 



Seled. Tuphium. Aubn-ra. Alolkl, Khons. Paalit. Assa. 



Armais or Har-em-heb. Anuhis. 



I 

 Archies. 



To tliese Tables may be added tbat of the probable connections of 



the line of Onam with that of the Shepherds : — 



Usecberes. Onnos. 



III. Sesostris. II. Sepbres. I. Acbes=claugbter. Semempses. Jadag, Ptah? 



Pacbnas or Cbeneres. daughter = Janias or Tankera. 



Atin-re = daughter. Assis. 



Athothis. 

 Still another genealogy, of a very imperfect character, which con- 

 nects with the line of Onam, is that of Hebron ; — 

 Laadah. 



Mareshah or Mceris. 



iJe&row or Cephren=Hanku of Hebopolis. 



Korah. Tap23uah. Mekem or Eekamai. Shema. 



II.— BABYLONIAN AND ASSYHIAN CONNECTION. 

 It does not follow because a name and even a royal name is 

 found on an Egyptian monument or occupying a place in the lists of 

 Manetho, Erastothenes, Bar-Hebrseus, etc., that the person who bore 

 the name exercised sovereignty in Egypt, or exercised that sovereignty 

 there and nowhere else. This I state in order to prepai-e the way 

 for the ajDpearance of Chaldean and Assyrian names, royal and divine, 

 which are identical with those that have met us in the history of 

 Egypt. Bryant, in his elaborate " Analysis of Ancient Mythology," 

 a work full of false notions, and based upon an erroneous etymological 

 theory, yet containing much valuable information, finds in the Baby- 

 lonians the lonim of antiquity.^ He points out the important fact 



84 Analysis of Ancient Mythology, iv. 205. 



