THE KILLIGREW MANUSCRIPT. 191 



the charter as afs* (aforesaid), so that Sir Peter had not only 

 all the interest of the said two towns to defend against, but 

 also by the villany of the said Eogers his own town of 

 Falmouth. 



[Page 278, line 19, hetween Quay *^ * ^^ andY"'] then built; in 

 the obtaining which Act of Parliament he still met 

 with the same opposition from the jealousy of the s*^ 

 two towns that Falmouth would rise in trade to their 

 prejudice and in a more especial manner from the 

 said Eogers and his understrappers, the Corporation of 

 Falmouth. The s'^ public Quay perfected ( ^pJ^ojeTte?"' ) 

 and established * ^' * * would have answered all 

 his labour and cost. I may well say — labour — for 

 that is well known in building the said quay and sinking 

 the foundation thereof (tidework) he personally attended 

 the same a-nights, as the tides required, so laborious and 

 indefatigable was he in the undertaking ; but God 

 thought fit not to allow him the enjoyment of such his 

 labours, but to a£B.ict him with much greater troubles 

 commencing from about the latter end of the year 1683. 



\_Page 279, last line of par. 2, after among his tenants * *" ^'j In 

 particular Sir Peter having an unhappy dispute at law 

 with one Carpenter upon an Extent taking ( t^^en ) oi^t of 

 the Exchequer against the said Carpenter on a debt, for 

 which Sir Peter was bound, whose defence of the said 

 extent pleadedagainstby Carpenter (supported by(^^®g-~}'^*''*) 

 Eogers) in point of merit depended upon Sir Peter's pro- 

 ducing the Sheriff's warrant for execution, not to be found, 

 was at last fathered upon one Henderson, a miserable 

 rascal, and follower of the bailiffs, who, being pressed in 

 the case, had the assurance to own he had lighted his 

 pipe with the said warrant, and, for which good j)iece of 

 service, the said Eogers made him chief sergeant and 

 mace-bearer of the Corporation to nose Sir Peter in his 

 own town, which dispute at law carried on under the said 

 Carpenter's name, in the end, after many years' vexation, 

 cost Sir Peter £3,000 or thereabouts. 



\_Page 280, last line in par. 1, said Eogers."] and so continued for 

 some years. During such Sir Peter's residence at London, 



