488 NOTES ON LATIN INSCRIPTIONS FOUND IN BRITAIN. 
lieve that VIAN [N or A] stands for Véenna, his birth-place, especially 
as it is in the right position, according to the normal collocation. This 
conjecture is confirmed by the circumstance that all the natives of 
Vienna (scil. Allobrogum), mentioned in inscriptions, belonged to the 
Voltinian tribe ;* e. gr. Orelli, n. 445. 
C:VALERI 
VS:C:F-VOL 
CAMPANVS 
VIENNA MIL 
La Cy Beak 
&e. &e. &e. 
Vide also Horsley, Brit. Rom. Yorkshire, n. 8; Orelli, n. 453 ; 
Letronne, Inscr. de 1 Egypte, Pl. xxxi. 3; &e. 
IT would read. the inscription thus: Caius Valerius, Caii[filius], 
Voltinia [tribu], Tullus, Vienna, miles Legionis xx, Valerize (not Valen- 
tis, for which there is no competent authority+) Victricis. According 
to this reading, I regard the A i VIAN as a mistake either of ortho- 
graphy or of reading for H; but it is possible that VIANA, a town 
of Rheetia or Noricum, may be intended, as Reimesius interprets the 
inscription, which he gives in Class viii. n. 38. It is worthy of no- 
tice, however, that the person named in that inscription also was of 
the Voltinian tribe. 
31. In p. 261 of the same work, an altar is figured, which bears 
the following inscription :— 
SOLI 
APOLLINI 
ANICERO. 
* T do not mean to say that all the natives of Vienna were of the same tribe. There are 
examples which prove that some who had the same town as their birth-place were of differ. 
ent tribes. Vide Orelli, n. 3104; and Henzen, n. 6426. 
+Lregard VALEN: applied to the xxth Legion in Gruter, cecexcii., 5, as a mis-reading. 
VALEBIA is confirmed, (as Mr. Maughan, Journal of the Archeological Institute, xv. 159, 
remarks), by Dion Cassius, lv. 23, aud by Spon’s Miscellanea, p.195, cited by Orelli. To 
these references add Henzen, nn. 6680, and 6871. The remark in the Journal, 7. ¢. that “ the 
title occurs in the form of VALERIANA, onan inscription in Bath ” is, so far as I am aware, 
incorrect. I have not seen a copy of any inscription found there, in which the titles of the 
xxth Legion are given otherwise than V.V. Mr. Warner (History of Bath, appendix, 
p. 121,) gives VALERIANA as an expansion, but the stone has only V. 
