130 THE MANOR OF PENVRANE, &c. 
sigillum meum apposui. Hiis testibus, Otone Nycoll, Thoma Bere, Roberto 
Dyer, Johanne Smale, Johanne ffenell capellano, et aliis. Datum apud 
Bodmyniam die Veneris proximo ante festum Sancti Georgii Martyris anno 
regni Regis Henrici sexti post conquestum Anglie, vicesimo quinto. (22 
April, 1447). 
No. 13. 
Omnibus ad quos presens scriptum peruenerit Elizabeta relicta Johannis 
Colyn, salutem in Domino, Noueritisme prefatam Elizabetam in pura viduitate 
mea et libera potestate remisisse, relaxasse et omnino quietum clamasse 
Thome Treffry filio et heredi Thome Treffry de ffowy et Elizabete vxori sue, 
filie mee et heredibus inter eos legitime procreatis, totum ius meum et 
clameum quem umquam habui, habeo, seu quovismodo habere potero, ratione 
dotis mee manerii de Penffrayn cum suis pertinentiis. Ita videlicet quod 
nec Ego predicta Elizabeta nec aliquis alius nomine meo aliquid iuris vel 
clamei in predicto manerio cum suis pertinentiis, nec in aliqua inde parcella 
de cetero, exigere, clamare, seu vendicare potero, nec poterit infuturum. In - 
cuius rei testimonium huic presenti scripto sigillum meum apposui. Hiis 
testibus, Thoma Bere, Roberto Dyer, Johanne Smale, et aliis. Datum Bod- 
myniam penultimo die Maii anno regni Regis Henrici sexti post conquestum 
Anglie vicesimo quinto. (30 May, 1447). 
My predecessors, Historians of Cornwall, have passed over the 
parish of St. Pinnock with very scanty notice. What Lysons 
states will be familiar to the Members of the Royal Institution. 
He says that “the Manor of Penvrane anciently belonged to the 
“family of Silvester (should have been Silvesfon) afterwards called 
“Penvrane before the year 1426. Since then it is supposed to 
“have passed, towards the latter end of the following century, to 
“the Colyns. Elizabeth Colyn daughter of John Colyn brought 
“it as a marriage portion to the Treffry family.” The date 1426 
is clearly a mis-print. The author intended to write 1226.* 
Hichens in following Lysons very properly corrects this error, but 
he adds little to Lysons’ statement. 
* The deed of 1226 to which reference is here made did not fall under 
my notice at Place, and there is some uncertainty as to its date as described 
by Mr. Austen in his letter to Lysons. Mr. Austen says it is a grant from 
John de Lozeard to John de Penfran of a watercourse through the lands of 
Lozeard unto the mill of the said John de Penfran, the said John Ge Penfran 
paying yearly the rent of 3d. Mr. Austen thought the watercoure came 
through Lodge in the parish of Liskeard. We are inclined to think that the 
deed referred to by Mr. Austen is that printed as No. 3 in the previous col- 
lection, which agrees in all respects, save the date. 
+ The statement of Lysons, having been derived from the late Mr. Austen 
of Place, afterwards Treffry, is in the main correct, 
