HABITAT - FOREST SERVICE LOGGING ISSUES, WINTER RANGES, 

 LIVESTOCK GRAZING ON PUBLIC LANDS, ETC. 



I think the licenses are high enough. But Fish and Game should 

 be making better habitat with the money that they are receiving. 



I think that the Fish and Game should try and acquire more areas 

 to public lands and maint these areas in a beneficial way that 

 will improve herd developement . 



With hunter education for archery hunters maybe we could help 

 aleviate some of the wound animals that are not be found know. 



In my favorite hunting areas I am sure that excessive, 

 unprofitable, tax costing, land destroying logging isdestroying 

 the area. 



(Deer hunting and elk hunting) - I feel walk in areas should be 

 established in most areas with a special provision for the 

 handicapped. At the same time more permits could be issued in a 

 particular area. 



Concerning increased fees - I am for providing the fees (at least 

 a significant portion) can be used to develop habitat and leasing 

 land to hunt on. 



Pertaining to question 8E page 3, I think that it is important 

 that we buy more habitat. Personally I would not mind paying $25 

 or more for licenses if I knew the extra money was for buying 

 habitat. I would also like to see special archery seasons for 

 sheep, goats, and moose. PS, pertaining to question 7 

 improvement F, it is very important to pursue this matter to the 

 fullest. 



I enjoy the archery season just as it is. Don't screw with it 

 and set up a bunch of restrictions and regulations. The one 

 exception to this is that I wouldn't mind an increase in the 

 price of the archery stamp, as long as these monies would be used 

 solely to improve habitat. 



I think the big bull elk should be distributed more evenly 

 through the state. 



I first archery hunting for elk and deer was in 1987 for only a 

 few days. My reason for hunting is that it gives me an excuse to 

 be in the mountain. I'm not confident enough with a bow yet to 

 take a shot at something. Our primary meat source is wild game. 

 Increased habitat is the main management action I support. I 

 would gladly pay $20.00 or more for a license if most of the 

 money went for increased habitat. 



1 



