general the Breaks could be better managed, 1) by having more on 

 site personnel (possibly deputies), 2) unrestricted bow hunting, 

 3) a little more access, 4) less ATV's, motorcycles, and 

 aircraft, 5) more restriction on outfitters (who put on a big 

 show) . But they best thing would be making it a "primitive 

 weapons only area." I also think you should have a ten horse 

 power limit on the river, portion to let's say C.K. Creek. Don't 

 make me a law breaker. 



All areas should be branch antlered bull only, protect the 

 spikes . 



I would gladly give up two weeks of bow season for two weeks of 

 late season for either sex. 



Since you pay a fee for permit I think it should have a separate 

 deer tag. 



Because archers should not have to buy an additional license. 

 Also, I want an archery season after gun season. 



Why be penalized six dollars for hunting with a bow? Why not 

 make rifle and archery even rates. 



There seems to be too little time. 



My area had helicopters in it during the time I hunted. 



I would like to see a choose your season bow or rifle. This 

 would help keep some of the less serious archers from disturbing 

 elk in the rut. 



I feel the archery hunter is over charged and charged unfairly. 



Too many bow hunters. 



We need more archery and less rifle seasons. We need bigger mule 

 deer. 



I support either or season, either rifle or archery. 



No, there are too many out of state licenses. 



Too many areas are closed to drawing only. 



I feel 8A part II is ok if you go for primitive weapons (bow and 

 flint lock rifles) or rifle. 



1) We can't hunt deer in units 631, 632 etc., unless you have a 

 special elk permit; 2) why is an archery stamp required? 



Too many bird hunters have no respect for our sport. I would 



23 



