Yes, except I would like to be able to have a tag for archery and 

 a tag for rifle. 



I think the archery season and regulations are just about right 

 the way they are. 



Archery, I think is at a peak level. Many persons are beginning 

 to drop out and I feel the hunter numbers may decrease in a two 

 to five year span. 



The elk aren't being threatened to much so it's just right. 



Not too many people hunt archery, a early hunt for big game. 



I usually get my fair share of shots. 



Best there is . 



At present in areas wherre I hunt, I don't feel we've reached 

 the threshold for choice between archery or rifle. At some point 

 in the future this will probably be necessary. 



No specific reason. 



I can hunt for either sex and can hunt in any district according 

 to district regulations. 



As things stand I'm satisfied but I see no reason for archery or 

 rifle to be number one. 



Yes, except for increasing nonresidents all over. 



Because it's a challenging sport. 



My first year in Montana and I was not able to hunt. 



During rut. 



Yes, except should choose either rifle or archery. 



There is ample amount of time during the rut and I usually find 

 enough elk to satisfy me even though I have never taken a shot. 



It coincides with rut. 



Elk are more of a challenge to hunt which makes it better to look 

 forward to the next day of hunting. 



In my area there are few hunters and a fair amount of elk. 



Overall good opportunities, but should have late bow seasons. 



Because you can hunt both species. 



It is satisfactory to me. 



