Jan. 20,] 



THE NEWSPAPER. 



• t 



by the law of na ns ; and if circumstances gmve the country a 

 command over the property of the Prince, and that power was 

 used to enforce obedience, it was still considered as an hostile 

 aggression. On the other hand, a state might seek redress for 

 an injured subject. This might be followed by refusal and the 

 result again was war. It became therefore a question of what 

 was to be done where a court had power to enforce its orders 

 where there was property and the offender was a sovereign 

 prince ; and it seemed that it ought to be treated as a cause of 

 war, instead of a violation of the laws of the country and an 

 attempt to bring him to Justice in the courts of ordinary juris- 

 diction. The cane of the defendant was not modified by his 

 being a subject of the Queen of i ugland. Before he became 

 King of Hanover he gave in his allegiance, and this had since 

 been renewed and he had claimed and exercised his right as a 

 peer. It could not therefore be said that he was exempt from 

 the jurisdiction. The law admitted the inviolability of his cha- 

 racter as king, but left him responsible on other grounds; he 

 could not be considered inviolable as a legal adviser of the 

 Queen, other ministers might be Impeached, and great difficulty 

 might arise from the union of the two characters of king and 

 subject. It did not seem that there could be any complaint if 

 the defendant was compelled to account for the acts done by 

 him as a subject. The King was exempt from being sued for acts 

 done as a king, but as a subject of the Queen he was liable for 

 acts done as a subject, and also m respect of acts done out of the 

 realm, hut as against the public his acts mint be attributed to 

 his character of sovereign instead of that of subject ; and it ought 

 in cases similar to this clearly to be shown that a sovereign 

 prince ought i to be sued as a subject. In this case it did not 

 seem t this was a question between subject and subject, 



i her did it appear that the toetnuu could be impeached: it 

 was alleged to be null and void, bat the allegation was too vague. 

 Tue Inntrun t was not one of policy, but was stated to have 

 arisen out of the revolution. He should be inclined to consider 

 it as a state document, but it was not necessary to consider that 

 ] it; the question was whether the Court had jurisdiction 

 which made the defendant liable to the process of the Court lie 

 thought It had; but the acts for which he was sued were not 

 such for which he could be sued, and therefore the demurrer 

 must be allowed. 



Rirhnrdaon v. Hn.ttingt.-Th\% cause came on upon demurrer. 

 The p! ur. tiff Charles Richardson filed the bill on behalf of himself 

 and all others (excepting the defendant-* who were at Its riisso 

 lotion members of "The Milan ." against Ed ward Hast, 



lugs and Henry Emljr, and the pra\ « r waiter an account of the 

 ■tie of furniture comprised In a deed of the 27th of January, 

 183», and lor payment to the plaint iff as trustee, and also for an 

 account of th.-sale of the wine*, books, and effects of the Club, 

 and of flic subscriptions of the membe n the defendant's bands. 

 The bill stated that in 1830 the defendants agreed with Messrs. 

 Tuhhrn, Stewart, and others, to form a club under the name of 



|Thc Alliance Club." and In February, 1837, they procured the 

 of a house in Pall-mall to be granted to Hastings, Stewart, 

 and Tnbbe, as trustees for the Club. These trustees in March, 

 1837, entered Intn an agreement with Hodfktnton for the hire of 

 furniture for the Club, and in the following April the house was 

 opened for the Club, which consisted of 100 members, and Chap- 

 man was appointed the Steward. Rules were made, and a deed 

 executed by the plaintiff and twenty-one other members, and the 

 hired furniture was purchased. Tuhbs retirinr, the lease was 

 surrendered, and a new one granted in March 1839 to Hastings, 

 Stewart, and Emly, at a rent of 450/. The affairs of the Club 

 became embarrassed, and in June 1838, Dobson the auditor of 

 the accounts, prepared a statement by which the liabilities were 

 l.mn/. At a meeting on the int.li of May, ifno. it was stated that 

 a contribution of i:»f. from each member would meet the liabili- 

 ties, and a resolution for payment thereof was passed, and for 

 selling and winding up the affairs. The plaintiff with sixty- seven 

 other members, paid their 13/. Into the bank of Messrs. Hopkln- 

 •on, and a c uumittec ndvcrtlsed the lease and good-will of the 

 Club house for sale. The bill then stated that the defendants 

 took upon themselves to act according to thcirown view, entered 

 into a c ract to sell the lease to William Mason, and without 

 consul t the plaintiff, who waa trustee, sold the furniture to 

 m, denying the plaintiff's right to interfere, and received 

 upwards of 1,200/.. but the plaintiff had not been able to obtain 

 an account. In November, 1830. the defendants took possession 

 of the accounts, and disposed of the other property of the Club. 

 The defendants demurred for want of cquitv, and also for want 

 of parties. For the plaintiffs it was urged, that the impossibility 

 of making all the members of the Club parties was so great as to 

 amount practically to a decision that the suit could not proceed. 

 Lord Langriale overruled the demurrer for want of equity, but 

 allowed it for want of parties. 



Poi.ick.— We stated in our last that on Wednesday night 

 Daniel Forrester the officer apprehended the wife of a shopkeeper 

 who carries on business in Oxford-street, upon a warrant granted 

 by the Lord Mayor, on the charge of having been concerned in 

 the late forperies rf wills. On Friday the prisoner, who turns 

 out to be a Mrs. Georgiana Dorey, was brought up to be examined 

 as to her personal identity, previously to the day appointed for 

 the hearing of further evidence against Messrs. Barber and 

 Fletcher, when she will be placed at the bar with those Indi- 

 viduals, and the whole of the transactions will be gone into. 

 Mr. Cotton the governor and Mr. Heath deputy-governor of the 

 Bank of England, were among the gentlemen present during the 

 proceed n its. Mr. Clarkson stated that he was unexpected! v 

 called upon to appear before his Lordship, in consequence of a 

 fresh result of the inquiries which had been made, with a view 

 to bring all the parties who were engaged in the transactions he 

 had already described, as regarded Barber and Fletcher, to a con- 

 ditlon of responsibility. In the course of the inquiries made 1 

 the officers, it was ascertained that a woman who had resided in 

 Frivol, And was supposed to be concerned in the transac ions 

 alluded to in a very essential manner, was residing at No. 45, 

 Oxford street, with her husband. Mr. Dorey, who kept a shop for 

 the sale of ready-made mourning; and Daniel Forrester went 

 thither, provided with two witnesses, who upon seeing the 

 pr ner In the shop identified her as the person who had 

 hired the lodging at No. 7. Francis-street, Tottenham-court- 

 road, for the Emma Slack who was represented in the 

 alleged will of Ann Slack as the executrix and sole legatee of 

 that lady. The prisoner used some words of indignant denial 

 and menace upon hearing the accusation, but the witnesses 

 were the more confirmed in the opinion they had formed 

 as to her identity when they heard her speak and saw her more 

 closely. Forrester accordingly took her into custody, and subse- 

 quently additional matters came out which gave still greater 

 strength to the belief that she was not only one of thnse who had 

 accomplished the fraud in the case of Miss Slack, hut raised a 

 very strong suspicion that she had also lent a hand In the affair of 

 the will of Eliza Burchard, the last case which had been brought 

 before his Lordship. The vigilant officer, after having deposited 

 his prisoner in the Compter, went to Mr. Dorcy's house, suppos- 

 ing that he might, in searching amongst the prisoner's property, 

 find something calculated to throw additional light upon the 

 subject of the frauds. Mr. Dorey, it was proper to observe, gave 

 every po-Mble facility to the officer, who found in a box in the 

 prisoner's room a small seal, the production of which would be 

 a most important feature in the investigation. The prisoner was 

 the sister of a woman who was married to a Mr. Sanders, who 

 formerly resided at Bristol, but who had, together with his wife, 

 withdrawn to some place to which they had not as yet been 

 traced. There was ground for ropp- r,% that the parties who 

 had thus disappeared from the time that publicity was given to 

 these proceeding, were implicated In no slight degree in the 

 business to which so much public interest had been attracted.— 

 Daniel Forrester was then sworn. He said,— In consequence of 

 information which I received I applied for a warrant on Wednes- 

 day last against the prisoner, and accompanied Mr. Weare, a 





gentleman In Mr. Freshfield's office, to Oxford-street, where Mr. | 

 Dorey, the prisoner's husband, resides. Mrs. Neville, and her 

 daughter. Miss Neville, who reside at No. 7, Francis-street, Tot- 

 tenham-court-road, were in a cab in the neighbourhood of the 

 house, and by a previous arrangement Miss Neville went in and 

 succeeded in seeing the lady of the house on the pretence of pur- 

 chasing some black silk. Miss Neville intimated to me that the 

 prisoner waa the person who took lodgings in their house for Miss 

 Slack. I then told the prisoner that she was charged with being 

 the person who took lodgings for Emma Slack or Miss Slack. 

 She did not deny it at first, but she said, "At your peril say 

 so." Mrs. Neville then came into the shop and saw the prisoner. 

 I did not exactly hear what she said at first, but afterwards she 

 said she waa convinced the prisoner was the person who took the 

 Igings. I said I was obliged to take her into custody. After- 

 wards Mr. Dorey came into the shop, but the matter was not ex- 

 plained to him for some time. He evidently understood nothing 

 about it, and he said to us, "What can I do for you?" I made no 

 answer, but the prisoner said, "The lady has been looking at 

 some silk, but she don't want i\" I remained silent, and so did 

 the prisoner for some minutes, and Mr. Dorey kept looking at one 

 and then at the other. The prisoner then said, " The lady says 

 I had taken some lodgings." I said to the prisoner, " I thought 

 you would have explained to Mr. Dorey," and she replied, " No, 

 I would rather you should explain to him ;" and I then told him 

 that Mrs. Dorey was charged with having taken a lodging for Miss 



slack in Francis street, Tottenham court Road. Alter some fur- 

 ther conversation we went uy stairs, and Mr. Weare put several 

 questions to the prisoner, and asked her whether she had any 

 objection to write. Mrs. and Miss Neville were thus enabled to 

 hear her speak a good deal, and they declared that they were con- 

 vinced she was the person they had described her to be. I com- 

 municated to Mrs. Dorey that it waa my duty to take her before 

 the Lord Mayor. I said to Mr.Dorey, "Where is the woollen cloak 

 with the baron it ? " The prisoner directly replied, that it was in 

 Mary's (the servant girl's) room. Mr. Dorey then, instead of go- 

 ing into Mary's room, went into the prisoner's room, and fetched 

 out a dark blue cloak with a dark bar on it. (Here the officer pro- 

 duced a dark cross-barred cloak.) I went Into Mary's room, but 

 the cloak in her room was not at all like this. I produced this to 

 Mrs. and Miss Neville and they said it was the description of cloak 

 which was worn by the lady who took the lodging for Miss Slack. 

 After I had taken the prisoner to the Mansion-house and disposed 

 ofhersecurcly, I returned to the house of Mr.Dorey forthc purpose 

 of making a search. I accompanied Mr. Weare. I found this seal in 

 a box which lay open in the prisoner's room, and which box Mr. 

 Dorey said was his. Idonotknow whether Mr. Weare or I picked 

 it up. I have had it in my possession ever since. Mr. Clarkson 

 here stated that the seal, which represented a small hand with 

 the fingers held upward, exactly fitted the impression made upon 

 the wax with which the will of Eliza Burchard was sealed. The 

 Lord Mayor compared the impression with the seal, and found 

 that they exactly corresponded. The Lord Mayor asked whether 

 the prisoner had any legal adviser to conduct her case? The 

 prisoner said in a very faint voice that she expected an attorney 

 to attend for her, but she apprehended he was in the country. 

 The Lord Mayor — I wish you to have every legal assistance you 

 may consider necessary, and I shall, if you wish it, at once ad- 

 journ this examination, to give you an opportunity of procuring 

 the aid of professional men. Mr. Clarkson said he had no desire 

 at all to proceed without giving the prisoner every possible means 

 of defending herself under circumstances of so serious a charac- 

 ter. Mrs. and Miss Neville were then examined, and identified 

 the prisoner as the person who took the lodgings in Francis- 

 street for Emma Slack. The pri s oner was then remanded till 

 Monday week, when a vast body of evidence will, it is expected, 

 he produced against the three individuals charged with these ex- 

 traordinary offences. In reference to this subject it appears that 

 Mrs. D >rey was in 1834 before the public as plaintiff, in the Court 

 of Exchequer, in an action of damages for breach of promise of 

 marriage. At that period she was Miss Georgiana Richards, and 

 the person against whom she brought the action was the " Rev." 

 Robert Taylor, the then notorious lecturer on infidelity. The 

 damages were laid at 2,000/. Miss Richards had also a political 

 acquaintance with Mr. Richard Carlile, the infidel writer, about 

 sixteen years ago. She was then living with her mother and her 

 married sister, Mrs. Sanders, at Bath, as a milliner, and was con- 

 sidered a person of very extraordinary abilities. Three or four 

 years afterwards she came to London, accompanied by her 

 mother, and as the family had embarrassments to contend with, 

 she accepted the situation of housekeeper at the Rotunda, on the 

 Surrey side of Blackfriars Bridge, where the Rev. Robert Taylor 

 was in the habit of lecturing in that building. At the trial she in- 

 stituted against him the jury awarded her damages to the amount 

 of 250/., and the principal witnesses examined upon the occasion 

 were Joshua Fletcher, the same person who stands charged with 

 Mr. Barber and herself as confederates in the alleged frauds upon 

 the Government, and Mr. and Mrs. Sanders, her brother-in law 

 and sister, whose presence is now so much required at the Man- 

 sion House. 



SPORTING. 



TATTERSALL'S, TnuasDAv.— DERBY.-SOOto 100 agst The 

 Ugly Buck and Rattan (taken) ; 18 to 1 agst Lord Maidstone's 

 Cockamaroo ; 20 to 1 agst Mr. Lichtwald's Leander ; 25 to 1 agst 

 Colonel Peel's Orlando (taken to 50/.) j 25 to 1 agst Colonel 

 Peel's Ionian (taken to 30/., and afterwards offered) ; 25 to 1 

 agst Mr. A. Wood's Running Rein (taken to 50/.); 1000 to 25 

 agst Mr. Bowes's Saddle-Bow (taken) ; 1000 to 25 agst Sir G. 

 Heathcote's Companero {taken, and afterwards offered) ; 60 to 1 

 agst Mr. St. Paul's Telemachus (take 1000 to 15) ; 1000 to 15 agst 



Mr. Thomhill's Apprentice (taken several times.) ST. LEGER. 



— 1000 even on the field agst the following seven :— Rattan, The 

 Ugly Buck, Leander, The Princess. Foig-a-ballagh, Zenobia, and 

 The Cure. 600 to 400 was afterwards betted on the field agst the 

 same lot. 100 even laid between the Vat colt and The Cure. 



BIRTHS.— On 21st June, at Wellington, New Zealand, thewife 

 of I. E. Featherston, Esq., M.D., of a daughter.— On 3d inst., at 

 Burton-hill, Malmesbury, the Lady of the Rev. C. Pitt, of a son. 

 —On "th Inat, at the Rectory, Meppershall, Bedfordshire, the 

 lady of the Rev. H. Howartb, of a still-born son. -On 9th inst., 

 at Wootton Rectory, near Northampton, the wife of the Rev. I. 

 Prideaux Lightfoot, of a son. -On 10th inst., at Langford 

 Grove, the Rt. Hon. Lady Rayleigh, of a son.— On 12th inst , at 

 Harwich, the lady of Lieut. Creykk, R.N., of a son.— On 13th 

 inst., the wife of E. S. Stepiiknson, Esq., of Great Queen-street 

 St. James's Park, of a son.— On 14th inst., the wife of W.' 

 Grksham, Esq., of Castle-street, Holborn, and of No. 42 Not- 

 ting- hill-square, Kensington, of a son.— On 15th inst., in Devon- 

 shire-terrace, Mrs. C. Dickbx*, of a son.-On 16th inst., at 59. 

 Upper Seymour-«t.. the Hon. Lady Dallas, of a daughter.- On 

 16th inst., at Crowle Vicarage, Lincolnshire, the lady of the Rev 

 B. J. Armstrong, of a daughter. 



iiSSfu 6 ?^ 01 Tuesday, Jan. 16, at Holme Pierrepoint, 

 Notts R H. \\ . Milks, son of P. J. Miles, Esq., of Leight Court, 

 Somersetsh., to Mart Ells*, eldest daughter of the Rev J J 

 Cleaver, Rector of Holme Pierrepoint.-18th inst., William, son 

 °JVv D x ! mlo y> J*?*, of Edinburgh, to Mario* Moffat, daughter 



f/n^'p T le * >?"~k U ! '"?*" 9it "• p - Davisov. of Swar- 

 land Park, Northumberland, to the Hon. Carolivb North 



Gravks, second daughter of the late, and sister of the present 



Lord Gravcs-4th Nov., 1843, at Cawnpore, J. Sibi.ev, Esq!! 



IS g " V Maiioai,t ' cldest daughter of Gen. Boyd — 

 16th nit., at Gibraltar, Prroiwand Schott, Esq., Consul for the 

 free city of Frankfort, to Carolina, eldest daughter of Pablo 

 Larios, Esq.-I3th inst. David Lloyo, youngest son of the late 

 Rev. J. L. Jones, of Plas-Madoc, to Catharine Julia, third 

 daughter of the late Philip Francis. Esq. ' 



DIED. -On 1 "th Oct. at Dacca, Bengal, R. B. Duncan Eso 

 Surgeon, 4yth N.I.-On 1st Nov. at the Witti^ g,i R A. 



Douglas, Bart., of Glenbervie.— On 3d inst at W 

 Richbnda, relict of T. H. Mastcrman, Esq of Kmw 

 inst., at Park-Place, Cheltenham, Julia WiLkincov?^! 

 Thos. Allport.-Oo 10th inst., at Dunany House' Lon'h m? **« 

 LadyBkllingham.— On 11th inst.. at Clayton- PlaeJ *i 

 ton-Road, Diana Elizabeth Edwards.— On llthinTr 

 brook, Bucks, Sarah Seffkns, eldest daughter of w o*^»> 

 Esq. — On 12th inst., at Great Ealing, Mrs.SAa\» F 

 12th inst., Kensington, J. Bayford, Esq.— On 12th imJ U "' 

 7, Ecclestou-st., Pimlico, R. Sparling, Esq.— On iSi*** 

 Grove House, Ham, Surrey, W. Beebk, Esq.— On io»hX ,r 

 Milling Deanery, Lewes, Miss Lucy Raikes.- On 12th • 

 Saxmundham, Suffolk, Mr. R. Freeman.— On 13th ■ m ^* g 

 Cheltenham, Marianne, eldest daughter of the late Li* 

 Aubrey.— On 13th inst., J. Strutt, Esq., of Derby — On»Sk 

 at Loughborough. place, Brixton, Mr. H. Cafkl.— Qm ifj 

 at Islington, Anna Maria, the wife of Mr. S. Dawes fw 

 inst., in the Isle of Wight, Lieut. J. H. Peel, R.N.-OnTiiki 

 at Hastings, W. Scrivens, Esq., banker.— On 13th inst ? 

 ford, R. Hughes, Esq.— On 13th inst., in Belgiare SaiSr 

 Countess Dowager of Clare.— On uth inst., at WmLL 

 Finchley-common, W. Roscoe, Esq.— On 14th inst. at Fin! 

 Bow-road, R. R. B 11 own. Esq.— On Uth inst., at 57 n«ri5?l 

 race, Hyde Park, the Rev. W. J. Wilton, M.A.-6nuSS? 





Elizabeth, the wife of G. Wigg, Esq., Mecklenbureh 

 On 14th inst., at Wargrave-hill, Berks, Lieut. -Col. I 



Rati*; 





ML,* 



14, Westbouroe place, Eaton-square, Elizabeth, tie wifttft 

 Sedgwick, Esq.— On 15th inst., S. Stephenson, Esq ofS* 

 Queen-street, St. James's- park. — On 15th inst., at HieaaZ 

 Surrey, Com. J. Guyo.v, R.N. -On 15th inst., at DownsiTn 

 lege, near Bath, Count Mazzinghi, the eminent coropos« 

 On 16th inst., at Thorncroft, near Leatherhead, Col DrimVL 



Jane, relict of the late W. Farthing, of Comhill, 'aged m3) 

 Oth inst., at Nice, Italy, aged 28, Mary Ann, the eldest daw*, 

 of Mr. E. White, of Lamb's Conduit- street.— On 12 th instla- 

 wife of the Rev. J. Williams, Vicar of Spilsburv, Vi 

 On Monday, the 15th instant, at Kingston-house Bat 

 John Blandy, Esq. — On 17th inst., at Brixton-hUL Mr 

 M a ryan, widow of the late Capt. R. Maryan, of the Eutba 

 Militia, aged 79.— On J7th inst., at Winscombe, Mrs. Wgiur 

 aged 75, relict of the late Col. Whalley, of Winscombe-cowt 

 descendant in the fifth degree and representative of Sir Nick* 

 Hyde, Chief Justice of England, temp. Charles I.— On ijthist 

 at Bath, Vice-Adm. Sir R. L. Fitzokrald, K.C.H., in tbefc 

 year of his age, only surviving child of Mrs. Milner, of 9, 



Grosvenor-street. 



Cut 





GAZETTE OF THE WEEK. 



BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED.- J. Kidd, Kendal, Won 



*^ OC JI r 7i J " a 1 n , d 1 F - Har wood, Fenehurch-street, City, stationer! -J 

 bhemeid, table knife-manufacturer. 



BANKRUPTS.— J. Pimott, jun., Richmond, Surrey, cabinet-M* 

 M. J. Dvkk, Romsey, Hant?, Innkeeper — W. Uromlkv, Cray's Inn t< , fetf 

 Inn, scrivener— C S. S-vbb.vry, Albion-place, Hyde park-squire, ap»ih«*T. 

 i. and J. Slksingbk, Cateaton-street, city, warehousemen— £. Hontov.T.^ 

 ston, lWthamptonshire, Jinendraper— W. Bakbr, Lower GrotveioMCr 

 Bond-street, surgeon— J. C. Khilt,, Gloucester, tailor— G. Pnum, Imam 

 innkeeper— J. Keavblkv; Queenhithe, City, paper commission ifesut 

 Bbarup, Newcasle-upon-Tyne, joiner— \V. Lewis, Jun-, Axbrid*e,ftM* 

 Bhire, baker— T. B,xri*v, Kccleston, Lancashire, calico-printer. 



SCOTCH SEQUKSTRATIONS.-A. Mackay, Musselburgh, mmft»-i 

 J. Cairns, Kippendavie, Perthshire, farmer— W. Brown, Troon, 

 C Blair, Alloa, maltster. 



WANTED IMMEDIATELY, a steady, active Mi 



*» in the PROPAGATING DEPARTMENT. - Apply ■ 

 J. Riobv, Stanhope Nursery, Gloucester-road, Old Bromptti. 

 Jan. 17, 1844. 





WANT PLACES.— All Letters to be post-paid. 

 A S GARDENER.— A single Man; has no object* 



-^*- to look after a horse and chaise and make himself umH 

 Can have a good character of 2 years and 8 months from to* 

 place. No objection to town or country.— Direct to Mr. h» 

 Wimbledon, Surrey. 



AS GARDENER.— A married Man, aged 35, with* 

 incumbrance, who thoroughly understands his brata» 

 can take charge of Land and Stock, if required. Can hare* 

 years' character, and be strongly recommended bythepentlejj 



he has inst left. — Direr* rr» .1 F» ->4 Sar-Wi lie. street. PicC* 



AS GARDENER.— An industrious married Me 

 aged 23, who is perfect master of every branch of G* 1 *; 

 ing, including Pine-, early forcing of Grape*, &c, and f«* 

 care of Hot and Greenhouses, Kitchen and Flower-garden*,* 

 care of Meadow-land ; his wife would act as housekeeper or* 

 in a lodge. Can get unexceptionable character.— Direct H.w- 

 Post Office, Mare-street, Hackney. 



AS GARDENER, where one or more men are kept- 

 A young Man, aged 35, who perfectly understands Foj* 

 Kitchen, Fruit, and Flower Gardening, and has a Prj** 

 knowledge of the cultivation of Plants; has no objection »» 

 charge of land, and can have an unexceptionable character** 

 the Gentleman he has lived with 4£ years.— Direct to w-'^ 

 Mr. Pamplin's Nursery, Hornsey-road, Islington^ 



TO SEEDSMEN, ftc. , .. ... 



AS SECOND WAREHOUSEMAN. — A }* 

 Man, 25 Years of Age, is desirous of obtaining a Sij«» 

 as above, or to assist in the Shop if required. He can n* ^ 

 recommended by his present employer, with whom he n 

 two years.— Direct to A. B., at Messrs. Ronalds', New Bren 

 Middlesex. 



A 



of exte 



TO NOBLEMEN AND GENTLEMEN. . j 



LAND-AGENT. — A thoroughly exper^J 



Practical Agriculturist, who has long had the ^J^JEJi 

 ~. extensive property in one of the first Agricultural " aw ^ 

 Scotland, and who will shortly leave his present cn *T,|jR 

 unavoidable circumstances. For character and P ra st0 A. 

 the most satisfactory references will be given.— Ad S , ;**«* 

 Mr. Cuthbert's Seed Warehouse, 12, Clayton- square, u 



— ■ ■ — ^ I 



AS FOREMAN.— A Man of talent and ability ^ 

 has carried on an extensive Business in tne * Nur f 5 t0 c* 

 Seed Trade, is desirous to engage himself as Foreman, ° b(J| ^ 

 duct, the business of a general Nursery. He has a p 

 practical knowledge of the Trade in its various bra "^ iL ^^ 

 first-rate Propagator, and a good Salesman. A PPy * 

 Mr. w. Bristow's, Seedsman, Knightsbridge, Loudon. 



rpO LANDED PROPRIETORS— A young pertg, 



-JL the highest respectability is desirous of obtaining ^ 

 tion as AGENT to a Nobleman or Landed Fropnetor.^ ^ 



been four years with a gentleman who has ext I c ^ ! Td to *•*£ 



under his management, and is, therefore, well quality .p 



take the duties of such a Situation.— Apply to J. *-• 4 

 Agricultural Gazette Office. 



