Feb. 17,] 



THE NEWSPAPER. 



[1844. 



names from the list of the Association.— On Tuesday, 

 Mr. O'Connell issued a second Address to the people of 

 Ireland, stating that, subsequently to the meeting, he had 

 some reasons for altering his views respecting his visit to 

 London for the purpose of attending the discussion upon 

 Lord John Russell's motion. " I have formed," he says, 

 M a better opinion of the views with which that motion is 

 brought forward. Besides, it now seems to me quite 

 clear that there may occur in the course of the debate 

 some topics which it would be desirable that I should be 

 present to elucidate. Again, it has occurred to me, 

 that it is my duty to attend once more in my place 

 in the House of Commons, and to protest, in the 

 name of the Catholic people of Ireland, against the 

 attempt made — and, in this instance, I think, 

 successfully made — by the Attorney-General, to repeal 

 the most beneficial part of the Emancipation Act- 

 namely, that which professed to secure for us fair and im- 

 partial trial by Jury." Accordingly, Mr. O'Connell left 

 Kingstown on Tuesday evening, accompanied by Mr. M. 

 O'Connell, M.P.; Mr. John O'Connell, M.P. ; Mr. M. 

 J. O'Connell, M.P., and Mr. N. Maher, the new member 

 for Tipperary, and Sir Coleman O'Loghlen, one of his 

 counsel in the recent trials. They arrived at Liverpool 

 on Wednesday morning. A large concourse of countrymen 

 awaited Mr. O'Conneirs arrival on the pier, who received 

 him with enthusiastic cheers, and drew him in a hackney 

 coach up to the Adelphi Hotel, where he remained during 

 the day, being too fatigued to proceed at once to town. 

 Large numbers of persons congregated round the hotel, 

 and Mr. O'Connell addressed them in a brief speech. He 

 left Liverpool in the evening for London, and it will be 

 seen by our Parliamentary Report, that he was present 

 at the debate on Thursday night. 



to all those matters which were supplied for the I daughter of the late H. Brown, Esq., of Portland- place, London. 



a 



YOU 



JWisccliaiuous. 



Madame Catalanu — A letter from Florence in the Ger- 

 man papers states that the account copied from the Journal 

 des DthatSy respecting the alleged death of Madame Cata- 

 lani at her villa near Sinigaglia proves to be erroneous. It 

 appears that on the contrary she is at present in her 

 beautiful villa in the neighbourhood of Florence and in the 

 best health that could be expected with reference to her 

 advanced age. As a proof of this it would be sufficient 

 to state that on last New YearVday she had a circle of 

 friends around her at dinner, and that on this occasion 

 the account of her death was read from the French news- 

 papers. The report that her husband M. de Valabreque 

 died in 1828 is equally untrue. He is still alive and like- 

 wise resides at Florence. Madame Catalani possesses no 

 villa at Sinigaglia, and in regard to her fortune, she 

 states that the estate where she resides and a few thousand 

 livres of income, is all she has saved from the millions the 

 principal capitals of Europe awarded her* 



4iatD. 



Court of Queen's Brxch.— Wharton v. M 1 Kenzic— College 

 Debt. — This was an action by a confectioner at Oxford, to recover 

 for goods supplied to the defendant while he was at Oxford. The 

 defence was that the things furnished were not necessaries. It 

 appeared that the things furnished consisted of ices, creams, 

 marmalade, and fruits. Some of these things, such as ices and 

 fruits, were said to have been ordered by the defendant's medi- 

 cal man for the defendant's use while he was suffering under a 

 temporary illness ; but it was also shown that some of the things 

 were had by the young man for the purpose of giving breakfasts 

 to his contemporaries. The defendant's father had been an M.P. 

 and was Governor of Ceylon. The Learned Judge who tried the 

 cause (Mr. Justice Wightman) told the Jury to consider whether 

 these things were necessaries for a young man of the defendant's 

 state and degree, and the Jury answering the question in the 

 affirmative, found a verdict for the plaintiff. A rule had hince 

 been obtained to set aside this verdict and have a new trial, on 

 the ground that the Learned Judge misdirected the Jury, as he 

 ought to have declared that to a young man in statu pupillari, 

 such things could not be necessaries. Mr. V. Lee and Mr. Pigott 

 showed cause against the rule, and Mr. Sergeant Talfourd was 

 heard in support of it ; when the case of M Cripps v. Hills" was 

 called on. This was an action of the same sort, and the same 

 defence was set up to it. The things furnished in this case con- 

 sisted of cocoa, coffee, and other matters for breakfast and 

 luncheon. The case was tried before Mr. Justice Maule, who 

 said that it was difficult to say what were necessaries ; that per- 

 haps nothing was a necessary which a man had not ; that perhaps 

 bread and water to live on were not necessaries, for it might not 

 be necessary that the man should live. But if otherwise, then 

 coarse brown bread and water and clothes were all that were 

 strictly necessary to his existence. That perhaps even clothes 

 ought to be excepted, for that if clothing was really necessary 

 for him, it was to be presumed that nature would have clothed 

 him. The Learned Judge therefore rejected the question of 

 necessaries or not, and said that the real question was whether 

 according to the habits of society these things were suitable to a 

 young man in the defendant's station in life. The defendant was 

 the son t f a country Squire who drove four-in-hand, and occa- 

 sionally with the other members of the family visited the son at 

 his rooms at the University, and partook of many of the things 

 which constituted the subject of this demand. The Jury at once 

 found a verdict for the plaintiff. A rule had since been obtained 

 to set aside this verdict and enter a nonsuit. Mr. AVhately and 

 Mr. V. Lee 6howed cause and contended that beyond the 

 general principle of these things being suitable to this young 

 man's situation in life, which was applicable here, it was plain 

 that the father's conduct was an answer to this defence. The 

 defendant was an undergraduate of Magdalen-hall, Oxford; 

 and, as the judges knew, the halls in Oxford were places of 

 more lax discipline than the colleges, and the father, who must 

 have known this, went to his son's rooms, and saw and partook 

 of the things thus furnished. Mr. Sergeant Talfourd, in support 

 of the rule, insisted that the jury ought to have taken the scpe 

 of the learned judge's charge, and ought to have found that 

 these were not necessaries. Lord Dcnman delivered judgment, 

 "This is a case of a kind which is often before the court, and 

 therefore makes it necessary for us to consider what is the rule. 

 The definition is well given by Mr. Baron Parke in a case in the 

 Court of Exchequer. The word necessaries is not confined in 

 its strict sense to such articles as are necessary for the support 

 of life, but may be extended to such articles as arc necessary to 

 maintain a person in the place, situ. i*iun, and degree of life in 

 which his fortune entitles him to move. Now the pleadings in 

 this case exactly raise the question whether these things were 

 necessaries for a person who was proved to be living in college, 

 where things were properly supplied to him for his immediate 

 .%;;?£, ?ULd where he had a large allowance besides. It ^eeir.s to 



•■ »Ko tri** would have beenj ustified in telli ng 



the jury, that as . 



visiting of the defendant's friends, there was no evidence of 

 their necessity, but, on the contrary, their necessity was dis- 

 proved. The question of what are, and what are not necessaries, 

 is generally a question of law. Different matters may be neces- 

 sary, according to the station of the parties -, clothes, for in- 

 stance, must be supplied, and a watch and some other things of 

 like kind, may not be unnecessary, but highly proper for a 

 _ung gentleman who goes into society, where he is expected 

 to wear such things. But for persons at the University, it is 

 impossible to say that anything of the kind here supplied can be 

 necessaries. It may be illiberal and harsh in parents not to pay 

 lor articles which have been supplied to their sons, but it is the 

 bounden duty of tradesmen to know somewhat of the circum- 

 stances of the party to whom the goods are supplied, and at all 

 events tradesmen should not give credit to young men for S°ods 

 of this description. If they will supply such goods, they should 

 have immediate payment, or at least supply no more until pay- 

 ment, and that at a short date, was made to them. There is 

 another consideration: this course of dealing subjects young 

 men, and perhaps their families, to serious embarrassments and 

 distress, against which they ought to be protected. However, 

 that is not the ground of my decision; hut I could not help 

 making the remark, in answer to the view taken by counsel as 

 to the hardship on tradesmen. We can only look to the rule of law, 

 which I think has been clearly stated, and which it will _ be most 

 useful to society strictly to enforce."-Mr. Justice Coleridge: I 

 am entirely of the same opinion. The question is, whether the 

 iudee or the jury should be held bound to decide what are ne- 

 cessaries. Both must sometimes be called on. For the richest 

 man at college, diamond rings, pictures, and race-horses, cannot 

 be said to be necessaries: and the question of necessaries may 

 in some cases be a mixed question of law and fact With 

 respect to what the law will consider necessaries, I think that 

 Mr. Baron Parke has laid down a most admirable definition. 

 The replication here alleges that these things were necessaries, 

 and to decide the issue thus raised, we must look at the circum- 

 stances, situation, and degree of the young man to whom they 

 have been supplied. We must do so, and so must the jury ; out 

 in considering this question, we must still recollect that neces- 

 saries do not, even when thus construed, mean the conveniences, 

 but the necessities of the situation. If we bear' that distinc- 

 tion in mind, we must come to the conclusion that things 

 of this sort are not necessaries, even for a young man in 

 this situation. They may not be unsuitable to his situation and 

 yet they may not be necessary for it. There is no justice in 

 talking of hardship to the tradesmen of the university; they 

 have a safe course if they think fit to adopt it. If they do not 

 intend to pander to young men's extravagance, they will refuse 

 to give long credit. Here in this claim credit is given for two 

 years and a half. Can such credit be given without a view to 

 encourage the extravagance of the undergraduate, in the hope 

 that however improper the charges would be paid at last ? They 

 ought to see that what they supply is paid for at once, or that 

 they must depend for their payment on what is sometimes called 

 the honour of the young man, for they have no legal right to en- 

 force demands so improperly created."— Mr. Justice Wightman: 

 " I entirely concur with the opinions of my lord and my brother 

 Coleridge. In my directions to the Jury I did not sufficiently 

 limit this question of necessaries by the consideration of the fact 

 that the defendant was then in statu pupillari, and was provided 

 with all ordinary necessaries from the college or by the allow- 

 ance of his father, and that there was no necessity for his obtain- 

 ing a supply of anything by resorting to a system of credit. I 

 . think, therefore, that there ought to he a rule for a new trial." 

 Rule for a new trial absolute in Cripps v. Hills on payment of 

 costs, and in Wharton v. Mackenzie without that condition. 



The Queen v. Patrick Leith Struhan.— The defendant in this 

 case had been convicted at the sittings after last term of an as- 

 sautt on a boy at Harrow School. Counsel for defendant now 

 attempted to set up a plea of aberration of mind in mitigation of 

 punishment, but the Court considered the charge fully proved 

 and sentenced the defendant to 18 months' imprisonment in the 



House of Correction. 



Cen-tralCiuminal Court.— Thelate Duel at CamdenTown.— 

 Lieut. Duncan Trevor Grant, who was said to have acted as second 

 to Lieut. Munro in the fatal duel at Camden-town, was charged 

 with aiding, abetting, and assisting Alexander Thompson Munro, 

 in the wilful murder of Col. David Lynar Fawcett. There were 

 several counts in the indictment. He was also charged under the 

 coroner's inquisition with the wilful murder of David Lynar Faw- 

 cett. The Attorney-General stated the case for the prosecution, the 

 facts of which have been so fully and frequently before our read- 

 ers, that we think it unnecessary to repeat them. The Attorney- 

 General said that the question the Jury had first to consider was 

 whether it would be satisfactorily proved that the prisoner was 

 present at the duel in which Col. Fawcett fell ; and next whether 

 if he was there, he was there for any criminal purpose, such as 

 was laid in the indictment. The principal witness for the pro- 

 secution was Mr. Gulliver, the surgeon who attended Col. 

 Fawcett at the duel. He said he saw Mr. Grant on the ground, 

 but was unable to state whether he was present when he was 

 called to attend Col. Fawcett after he was wounded. Mr Wil- 

 kins addressed the Jury for the defence, strongly insisting that 

 the case was only one of suspicion. Mr. Justice Cresswell 

 summed up, going minutely through the evidence, which he de- 

 scribed as chiefly circumstantial, and said that the Jury should 

 be perfectly satisfied that the circumstances would adnat of no 

 other solution than that the prisoner was present for the pur- 

 poses laid in the indictment before they returned a verdict of 

 Guilty. If they were satisfied that he was there with Mr. Munro 

 for the purpose of assisting at the fighting of a pre-arranged 

 duel, then they should find the prisoner Guilty ; but if they con- 

 sidered that the evidence was so insufficient as to afford any 

 reasonable ground for doubt, he felt it was unnecessary to direct 

 them to deal mercifully and give the prisoner the benefit of such 

 a doubt, by returning a verdict of Not Guilty. The Jury con- 

 sulted for a few minutes, and then without leaving the box, re- 

 turned a verdict of Not Guilty. There was some disposition to 

 applaud evinced in the Court, but it was instantly checked by 

 the officers. Mr. Grant was immediately discharged. 



—8th inst., at Milverton Church, T. R. Cobb, Esq., of Banbury* 

 to Margaret, youngest daughter of the late Rowland Parry* 

 Esq., of Liverpool.— 10th inst., Mr. B. Gibb, of Ratcliff-highway* 

 to Harriet, the youngest daughter of W. Hall, Esq., of Brixton* 

 Surrey.— 10th inst., atClapham Church, J.L. Davkmport, Esq.* 

 of Derby, to Matilda Octavia, fifth daughter of Mr. Masoii* 

 of Chigwell, Essex.— 12th inst., at St. George's, the Hon. Capt! 

 Denman, R.N., second son of Lord Denman, to Grack, youngest 

 daughter of J. Watts Russell, Esq., of Ilam-hall, Staffordshire.— 

 12th inst., at Trinity Church, Marylebone, and afterwards at the 

 Catholic Chapel, Spanish -place, J. Donklan, Esq., of H.M.'g 

 Customs, Stockton, son of the late M. Donelan, Esq., barrister- 

 at-law, and nephew of the late Countess of Fingall, to Emma 

 Maria, relict of the late Major Boates. 



DIED.— On the 19th Dec, 1843, at Ardingley, East Indies 

 Margaret Fraser Gai.braitii, wife of Lieutenant Thomas 

 Hay Campbell, Madras Artillery.— 1st inst., at Homberg, near 

 Frankfort-on-the- Maine, after many years' illness, John Meybr, 

 aged 61.— 5th inst., in the Cathedral precincts, Canterbury, of 

 inflammation of the throat, Emily Frances, second daugh. 

 terofthe Rev. George Wallace.— 5th inst., at Nice, France? 

 Julia, wife of G. H. Vernon, Esq., M.P.— 9th inst., at Paris* 

 after a few hours' illness, W. A. Bowver, Esq., of the Manor 

 Estate, Clapham, Surrey, aged 65.— 9th inst., at Barnstaple^ 

 Susanna, the widow of the late Capt. G. Richardson, of the Hon. 

 E.I.C.S. aged 65. —10th inst., at Grove-house, Twickenham, 

 Diana, widow of the late Major T. Harriott, of West-hall, Moru 

 lake, Surrey, aged 83.— 10th inst., at Sloane-street, of consump- 

 tion, Mary Anne, only daughter of the late Mr. E. Wilkinson, 

 aged 24.— llth inst., at Tonbridge Wells, Mrs. Morlev, aged 92. 

 — 11th inst., at Swaffham, Norfolk, J. Dugmore, Esq., aged 88. 

 —llth inst., at 83, Montpelier-road, Brighton, Mary Char- 

 lotte, second daughter of the late Rev. R. Anderson.— nth 

 inst., at the Crescent, America-square, Mrs. E. S. Glynes, wife 

 of Randall Glynes, Esq., aged 36.— 12th inst, Mr. J, Mar- 

 chant, of Little-park, Hustpierpoint, Sussex, aged 75.— 12th 

 inst., at Ware, Herts, Miss Ann Dickinson, aged 79-— 12th inst., 

 suddenly, at U, Peckham-grove, Mary Ann, relict of the lata 

 Mr. Samuel Pegg, of Blackfriars, and Norwood-lane, Surrey* 

 aged 74.— 12th inst., Mr. A. Smith, of birchin-lane, at his resi- 

 dence, 25, Penton- street, Pentonville, aged 64.— 13th inst, sud- 

 denly, Mr. John Merrick, aged 51, gardener for 20 years to Pryss 

 Pryse, Esq., M.P., of BuscotPark, Berks, deeply lamented by his 

 family and friends. 



GAZETTE OF THE WEEK. 



BANKRUPTCY ANNULLED.— J. Rhode*, now or late of Leed«, wool- 



ttapler. 



BANKRUPTS— J. Faulkhnhh, Danyers-street, Chelsea, bundpr_J.MiL- 

 hKR, Brook-street. New-road, engine-manufacturer — T. Amos, 1U, Kin^land- 

 road, builder — E. M. Marks, 21, Mortimer-street, Cavendish-square, and 1*>, 

 Stanhope-street, Regent's Park, upholsterer — G. Field, 2, Bond-court, WaJ- 

 brook, City, packer — R. Turnbr, Woodsome Lees, and of Highburton, York- 

 shire, f*ncy-cloth-manufacturer— T. Hiogtnbon, Liverpool, pawnbroker— J. H. 

 Barry, late of St. John>, New Brunswick, but now of Liverpool, merchant— 

 T. Lay, Dndley, Worcestershire, grocer— R. Lang, Birstall, Yorkshire, tallow- 

 chandler— H. Walkkr, Luton, Bedfordshire, cordwainer— J. Han.vkn, Little 

 Britain, City, tallow-melter— H. W. Smith, Tothill-tc, Westminster, wnollea 

 draper— R. Bkcklky, Green-st. f St. George'*, Middlesex, grocer— H. R. Os- 

 bornx, Truro, gioeer— M. Murphy, Liverpool, grocer— J. Holdroyd, North- 

 moor, Northumberlandshire, farmer — H. Hoi.den, Dewsbury, Yorkshire, ful- 

 ler's earth-dealer— E. Jonks, West Bromwu h Staffordshire, dealer in iron— H- 

 MrrcHki.L, Nottingham, fellmonger — T. NtrrrAMi, Rochdale, pork-butcher— 

 T. Norma*, Penketh, Lancashire, sail cloth manufacturer. 



WANTED, a young or middle-aged Man, as PROPA- 

 GATOR in an Establishment in the neighbourhood of 

 London, where nothing but pot plants are grown. He rausl 

 thoroughly understand his business in all its branches.— Apply, 

 by letter (post-paid), to A.B., 19, Milk-street, City, stating where 

 he has lived in that capacity. 



ANTED.— An active,industriousFARMiNG Bailiff 

 who can bring unexceptionable references as to character 

 from his last Situation, and thoroughly understands his business 

 in all its branches. The Farm which he will be required to 

 superintend is about 200 acres, three-fourths of which are Grass 

 Land ; therefore he must have a great knowledge of the Rearing 

 Management, and Selection of Stock, and of the Improvements 

 in the use of Manures. He must be a married man, without in- 

 cumbrance, and his wife will be required to take the charge cf 

 the Dairy and Poultry, to the care of which she must have been 

 previously accustomed. A Scotchman would be preferred.— 

 Direct, post paid, to H. V., Post Office, Hertford. _ 



STAPLKTON ROAD NURSERIES, BRISTOL. 



T^T ANTED immediately, as FOREMAN in an exten- 



» » sive country Nursery (in connection with the above), 

 a sober, steady, middle-aged Man, who perfectly understand* 

 the cultivation of Fruit-trees especially ; also the general routine 

 of Nursery Business. — Apply to Messrs. Wm. Maui.e and Co. 



N .B.— No person need apply who cannot be well recommend ed. 



WANT PLAC ES.— All Letters to be post-paid. 



TO NOBLEMEN AND GENTLEMEN. 



AS GARDENER— A married Man, aged 36, who per- 

 fectly understands his profession, and has been acenstomedto 

 the Management of Land and Stock. Can be highly recommendea 

 by the Gentleman he is about to leave, with whom he has mea 

 above eight years. Direct to Z.Z., Post-office, Fairford, Glouces- 

 tershire. 



S GARDENER A single young Man^g^^ 



he has been Foreman to several first-rate Establishments, 

 and can have an undeniable character from his present employe • 

 Direct to B. W., care of Mr. Waller, Postm an, Barnet^ ^____ 



AS GARDENER.— A respectable married Man, who 

 understands his business in all its branches, can bave^ 

 most undeniable reference as to character and capability fr °^ s 

 gentleman he has just left.— Direct to G. S., care of Mr. RoNA*- * 

 Nurseryman and Seedsman, Brentford, Middlesex. 



at, k 



**$-- 



tions upon single spcecn _^ 



case before the public, and to convict those 



BIRTHS.— On the ;th inst., at Holyrood Palace, the Princess 

 Marik, Marchioness of Douglas and Clydesdale, of a still-born 

 son.— 0th inst., at Grace Dieu Manor, Leicestershire, tbe lady of 

 A. L. Piiim.ips, Esq., of a daughter. — 10th inst., at 18, Spring 

 Gardens, the lady of R. B. Sheridan, Esq., of a daughter. — 10th 

 inst., in Powis-place, the lady of H. W. Busk, Esq., of a son.— 

 10th inst., at Pakenham Lodge, Suffolk, the lady of T. Thorn- 

 hill, jun., Esq., of a daughter.— 10th inst., at Widmore, Kent, 

 Mrs. N. Elias, of a son.— 10th inst., at Castle Strathallan, Perth- 

 shire, the lady of the Hon. W. H. Dru.mmovd, of a'son.— 

 1 1th inst., the lady of the Rev. G. Morris, of Sarisbury parsonage, 

 near Southampton, of a son.— llth inst., in Sussex-square, the 

 the Hon. Mrs. J. G. Hubbard, of a son.— llth inst., at Mount 

 Clements, near Stanmore, the lady of Capt. Palairet, late of the 

 20th reg., of a daughter.— 12th inst., at 9, Portland-place, Lower 

 Clapton, Mrs. A.Gavillar, of a son.— 12th inst., in Addison- 

 roari, Kensington, Mrs. W. W. Scrimgbour, of a son, which sur- 

 vived only a few hours.— 12th inst., at the parsonage, Upton St. 

 Leonard's, the lady of the Rev. J. Clemevts, of a daughter. — 

 12th B inst., in Norfolk-street, Park-lane, Mrs. P. Serocold, of a 

 daughter.— 12th inst, at Woodbury Down. Stoke Newington, 

 Mrs. J. L. Aubkrt, of a son and daughter, the former still-born. 



MARRIED.— On the 5th inst., at St. Mary's, Islington, Frko. 

 Alexander, only son of William Kent, Esq., of Hav« rstock-hill, 

 Hampstead, to Jane Theresa, second daughter of James Rey- 

 nolds, Esq., of Angel-terrace, Edmonton.— 8th inst., at Saxmund- 

 liam, C. T. Thompson, Esq., of Diss, Norfolk, to Emma Sarah, 

 eldest surviving daughter of the late E. D. Alston, Eiq., of Pal- 

 trave, Suffolk.— 8th inst , at St. Brelade'a Church, Jersey, Tmos. 

 Ingle, Esq., M.D., of La Hague, Jersey, to Anna Maria, 



A respectable married Man, aged 



ho has lived Head Gardener w^^ { 



AS GARDENER.- 

 39, without family, who ..«o j.-v« ***.- rtT 



Bishop of London, and a Member of Parliament ior the f . f £ 7 ha5 

 London, and has taken many prizes for six years. His wi ^ 

 had the charge of large mansions, and will fill that capa ui^ 

 required ; character most satisfactory.— Direct to A. **•> 

 Terry's, Earl-street, Kensington, Middlesex * - 



AS UNDER-GAIIDENER.— A respectable ■ jojM 

 Man, aged 25, of sober and industrious habits, wn o ' j0 

 general knowledge of his business, and has been several y ^ 

 the capacity of Foreman in extensive Forcing Gardens m ,. 

 land, from whence he has arrived in town. Can have an . ^ 

 ceptionable character for ability, sobriety, civility, and airei 

 Direct to A. B.. care of Mr. Russell. Gardener, Tuni haMjL-~r 



A young Man, J° d 



!roentatl8*.perw«*' edj- . 

 5l. for one at 15*. per week, for 3 years ; Surrey pre* 

 Direct to A. B., B»yley's Library, Kensington GraveU p^ — _--- 



A YOUNG MAN, 23 years of age, who baa i bee^ 



brought up in the Nursery business, is desirous o ' fer . 



ing a Situation In a SEED-SHOP iu London. Respecta ° ^,. 

 cucc and security can be given.— Direct to A.M., *" 



AS UNDER. GARDENER. 

 willing to give 10/. for nn Engagement 



Chronicle and Agricultural Gazette Office. , 



^.-.-«rvtDW 

 , ^.v,^ ..„ w b -. . ,ur giont* 



-1- or Gardener who will procure a situation within o« tic al 



for a single Man, aged 39. as GARDENER. Heh . as * he* eD 

 knowledge of his husim ss in all its branches, and cw .^ t>> 

 recommended by his present employer and others. 

 P. J., at No. 252, Whitechapel lload, London. 









