*1\ 



THE JMJfi WBPAPEi . 



[1844. 



Si^^.^SUti 



«• 



• ^ta'' that well-known bravura, on 



J^r not leaving the choice of embellish- 



fSSsts, has la lied all sorts of ornaments, 



J TOC ^ xhe brilliant passages she executed 



^ wkich made it a beautiful specimen of the florid 



V -Saw \« K oon as it was concluded, fomyuffc 



l!25dfrom several boxes; and the curtain had 



MUn than it was raised again for the repetition 



tiioeoeM*^" nnrt i on f the finale, in compliance 



?fSS2 S °f tUe^audicnoe. Altar O. 

 '-» tte ooera considerable anxiety was occasioned by 



a— ^t^ you'd* debutante having, whilst leaving the 

 -J"j£ i down apparently lifeless. With the assistance 

 rfft wSdrop she was, after some time, recovered The 

 . ViriiZeot from which she was suffering fully 

 ■"^STSTSi occurrence ; but, notwithstanding the 

 Jlotacc under which her anxiety placed her in the 

 -««fihe audience, her success was complete, and she 

 ZvLrf difficulties worthy of a prima donna we I accus- 

 mm* to the Opera boards. A vocalist of such extra- 

 rT^oarv natural powers bat, perhaps, rarely been seen by 

 Z^nLnce in this metropolis, and her management of 

 Sm powers is scarcely less extraordinary. — Signor 

 roriiisri the new tenor, who had deservedly become a 

 f.toarite 'with the Opera public, is now suffering so 

 severely from water on the chest as to prevent his sing- 

 b« and it is in contemplation to send for Tamburini, 

 «ko will shortly be in Paris. 



^ — _ ^^^^^^^^^mm^^^SSBmm^at^SSSmmm 



TLato. 



A««ifKlvTfLLioKXCK— Oxkord CiacuiT, Hereford.— Belters 

 w Chm'kend tfo//.— This was an action for libel brought by the 

 plaintiff. Win. Sellers, Esq., of Barnard's -green. Malvern, aga nst 

 tbe d«*eo<l.'Mt<, who are the proprietors and publishers of the 

 Woremter llrruld.- The libeN in this case were of an unusial 

 character. On the 2d December an article appeared in the de- 

 fendant's p* headed " Extraordinary Conduct to Horses," 

 ekarftoff the plaintiff with cruelty to a horse, in confining it in a 

 place ao small that it could not turn round or lie down without 

 rveoriating its aides in a dreadful manner. The reason for such 



rataent of the animal was stated to be in consequence of a 

 determination taken by the plaintiff some years before, 

 ween the mare threw him, and he then said, swearing, "I'll 

 aaaxe you suffer for this ; 1*11 put you in solitary confinement for 

 n year.- 1 s was communicated to them by a person who 

 pre«cnt at the time. Alter making this statement, the 

 4*fend*ut4 then prcceeded to comment on his conduct at some 

 length. In this article no name was mentioned, but a threat was 

 held out that unless the "inhuman man's tardy sense of justice 

 bad a p. er effect upon him, his name should be held up to that 

 •corn and contempt his conduct deserved." In consequence of 

 tins paragraph, Mr. Yewens one of the Secretaries of the 

 Katkasal Animals' Friend Society, went to Worcester and saw 

 Mr. Chalk, who told him that the person alluded to was Mr. 

 Reliefs, and that lie had received hlfl information from Colonel 

 Bland. Mr. Yewens went to the plaintiff, who immediately 

 showed him his mare, which with the exception of some marks 

 occasioned by her having attempted to strangle herself with a 

 JjjJJJ' was >n g->od working condition. Mr. Yewens went to Mr. 

 2* *ff*K and told him he thought he had b:en misled, as 

 fee plaintiff had satisfied him there was no foundation for 

 »t charpe. However, on the 16th, the defendants reiterated 

 the charge, and on the 23d published another article in which 

 the name of the plaintiff was mentioned, and some very strong 

 remarks made on him. A meeting for aiding the Society for the 

 jwawosj of Cruelty to Animals was a few days after held at 

 <^lo«easter, the Bishop in the chair, when Mr. Thomas, the sc- 

 ary to the Society, asserted that Mr. Sellers had been guiltv 

 S^rS?* ,m l jutcd to him by the defendants. This speech of 

 Y#»ISr maS Wa5 publisned by them in their next paper. Mr. 

 nntiir* V*** eJUmmed . and stated that after making every 

 KV' S?.,7 M con y mc ed the charge was not well founded. The 

 SiS. „i m*' Vlcar of VWehenford, and Capt. C. Bcauchamp, 

 SJ k?n*inJl ™ ccl!ent character for retired habits, humanity, 

 Sff aS?l v* nd fami,y <*>™«ions f being a near relative to 

 dranedt! « , rn ? n » of Wimbleton. Mr. Sergeant Talfourd ad- 

 amWrf«t v ., U ^ yi . n m, , tl ffation of damages, the defendant shaving 

 record m! n 7 ' « Ut put no plea of justification upon the 

 ooaMfcn n! * n arke havi "g addressed the Jury on the 

 Coart in «L flama ^ e8 ' thev retired, and on their return into 

 -Darna.^ iiL*" ° ur ' Slivered their verdict for the plaintiff 

 iMkSfnrk. i SnRE wsBi;av.-Jo«e/>A Willets, aged 17, was 

 SSatarn.«H*; °i n the l6th Feb ™*ry last, feloniously set 

 «T Joscnh Z, l?. d *V^ k * nf ha >'' w, »eat, and clover, the property 



Ohmnu th^r th» 1. J ' Mr - Bar °n Parke, in passing sentence, 



WttTtTTfo-," nmeofwh ' c h he had been found guilty was 



Uw which hadC« i So P unisha hle with death, and that if the 



» whii k«!t? ercU nad been sti11 in forc e, the case was 



^. ceminiv havpT Pe " al i- y W;)U,d ' so far as he was con - 

 , •oatrenriiriiH , e , n ll,n, cted. He was almost tempted to 



««ence, that her* J™ Tl wilh re *P*<* to the enormity of the 



«i»|W«bhmc:ita^l?K l ^ a V yaltcrationhad been made in 

 l«l**er the mn-T- by tnc law - He ^ould pass upon the 



E^Nn, to inflict nnlVT enQ i Whic , h the Le S is,aturc P er * 

 hiaaael,'. who at an I'* i any hoi ' e of reforming the prisoner 



°«t with the nhw a V 3 L an aj » re had shown so much depravity. 

 **W crimes ThI B d « te rrine others from the commission of 

 *• aeas for the JpJL J » nce was » that he be transported beyond 

 *■■»««. a TounJ Sr° " nat araJ lifc.-Mo.vMOUTH.-T/iowiM 

 ^etarw w ly rRt the Hendy, at Fen-Graig-Bargoed, 

 *»*«» child on L ,^! n ^ Wllfu],y murdered Mary Jones, his 

 **• coontr r, 1 J"' 1 November last, at Monydthuslone, in 

 [which was iHraS«m!» P w ed that the P»soner took the child 

 ***** K and licPi^H } fr0m the m °ther, stated that he had 

 "Peaaes: i Uat th n M?M° me , moMe y ff om the mother to pay the 

 «en tied up m o Ijl lia . was ^und drowned in the canal, having 



J^t^spotwhere^ J! l lat,am plate of 30 lb *- w,ight, and 

 **« Prtaoner was lLi-vI • nd was not far frorn the place where 

 diBc « »M adduced tn? WlUl the Child aIive - Additional cvi- 

 ^Vchension \**t o>„ ^ J? tliat th e prisoner expressed great 



22? her, in ^U^TtS^Jt^i *** that he had tbe cl,ild 

 •*?«€. that if he ran «L l aid u hc should certainly be hanged ; 



£*T rir ^«nataftcesS a J'r f S » 2 uM t assurcd,srbetaken ' Mai,y 

 J?***** the priaoiirr ■ a f elated - which tended materially to 



S^ 1 . *itn«aaei. Se,?'^ 't to , confir m the testimony of the prin- 



y^ry retired for abo^hJ; r,S0Qer ' Bdron Parke summed up, 

 01 J* ( ' v. ° Uk hait an h ««»r. and brought i:. a vtrd£t 



»oa 



eoit Ci 



J^ ^dieted f V'unl^f^^^^r^^ "«•- Wrt l 

 riL 1 '* v a letter th. I ns '-'' and Wontoaaly Bending 



SS?K $ ° f th h\ S nin„»- t K ninS t0 b,,r " l " m aUd thC ° tUCr 



* IwopVrW, Pl hai » jl1 their beds, and al to 



h'ing in t£ J2 " e . r J: ead " ' ' Oltr, Prosecutor is a 



appeared had carried off the best prizes for flowers and fruits in 

 many contests. One morning early in June, his gardener 

 biouo-hthim the alarming intelligence that some scores of his 

 youn" fruit-trees and shrubs, and the whole of his carnations 

 and other flowers, had been either rooted up or cut down, and 



ra°-e were lneu^-iuni, an,uv#u B w«» ««"«» • 



and the police took very active measures to assist the prosecutor. 

 Months passed away and nothing was heard of the criminal. 

 Early in the present year, one Pridmore, a tinman at Whittlesea, 

 cave information which led to the apprehension of the prisoner, 

 who had been apprenticed to him. Mr. Read upon his examina- 



tion proved the fact of the trees having been destroyed, 

 his cross-examination he said he had no knowledge of th 



Upon 

 his cross-examination ne saiu hc uau «« n .ivrr.^. & ^ «• v..e pri- 

 soner who could have no malice towards him. With respect to 

 Pridmore, however, he had once been summoned by that person 



\ of the prosecutor found a sealed tetter Inside his farmyard, ' 

 directed— " To the Farmers of Bluntisham, Hunts." She took it 

 to her master, who opened and read it; it was in these words :— 

 "Bluntisham, Hunts. To the Farmers. VYc are determined to 

 set fire to the whole of this place if you don't set us to work, a: 

 burn you in your beds if there is not an alteration. What do you 

 think the young men are to do if you don't set them to work ? 

 They must do something. The fact is, we cannot go any longer. 

 We must commit robbery and everything that is contrary to your 

 wish. I am, ' an kxemy.'"- Lord Abinger. having ordered 

 that the plea of the prisoner should be recorded, proceeded to pass 

 sentence. The prisoner, his Lordship observed, had pleaded 

 guiity to the commission of a crime of the greatest magnitude 

 and enormity, and one of which the Legislature had most 

 properly marked its sense by the severity of punishment it 

 had annexed to it. Of what use was it that men should join 

 together in the bonds of civil society, if there was no secu- 

 rity for life and property, if men could not sleep in peace and 

 a sense of security, but were to live in a state of constant 

 terror and alarm? The conduct of the prisoner was calcu- 

 lated to hold the district in which he lived in continual 

 terror, and it was not to be endured in a country in which law 

 prevailed that men should endeavour to compel others to do 

 that which might be against their interest or their- duty by 

 threats of suffering from loss of property, or of submitting to 

 death by the most horrible torments. The offence was of a most 

 atrocious character, and it might indeed almost be said, that the 

 sending of letters threatening to burn the property of the parties 

 to whom they were addressed was worse than the putting the 

 threat itself into execution, for when a man lost his property by 

 fire he at least knew the worst; but he to whom such threats 

 were made was made to live in a state of continual terror and 

 alarm. Such a state of society was intolerable, and in order 

 that the well-disposed part of society might sleep not only in 

 security, but in a sense of security under a well-founded trust 

 in the laws, and others be deterred from a repetition of the 

 offence of which the prisoner had admitted his guilt, he must 

 receive the extreme measure of punishment which the law had 

 annexed to his crime, which was, that he be transported beyond 

 the seas for the remainder of his life.— Cambridge— John Searle 

 was indicted for the wilful murder of William Garner on the 

 1st of February. The deceased was a farmer in the parish of 

 Willingham, in which place prisoner carried on the business of 

 a miller. They were at the Vine Inn on the evening of the 1st 

 February, and some angry words passed between them respect- 

 ing, the prisoner's wife. She was at that time living apart from 

 her husband, and the deceased taunted him with the fact, and 

 said he knew where the wife was better than her husband did 

 himself. The prisoner made some reply, which the witnesses 

 did not understand, and the matter died away. Gradually the 

 company fell off, and the prisoner and the murdered man were 

 the only persons left. After sitting together for a few minutes the 

 prisoner left the house, and the deceased followed in a quarter of 

 an hour. Before his death deceased made the following state- 

 ment which sufficiently explain? what followed :— " As sjon as I 

 had got three or four paces from the door, John Searle started 

 out from behind the gate and toak me unawares, and knocked 

 me down by a blow on the temple, and when I was on the ground 

 the man kicked me as hard as he could about the head and body. 

 I begged him not to murder me, but he said he would, he cer- 

 tainly would, and I prayed to him like a child not to kick me any 

 more, but he swore he would murder me before he left. And 

 when he had done so for some time he went away, first walking 

 and then running off; and a3 soon as I got my senses back, for 

 they had left me, I crawled back to the Vine, and the popletook 

 ue'in." It appeared from the evidence of the surgeons, that the 

 blows and kicks which the deceased received, had affected the 

 nervous system In an extraordinary degree, and brought on deli- 

 rium tremens, which was the immediate cause of his death. The 

 Jury immediately returned a verdict of Guilty of manslaughter, 

 and the prisoner was sentenced to be transported for 15 year^. 

 —William Moss, aged 20, was indicted for feloniously cutting 

 down 300 trees and shrubs, the property of Mr. W. Read, and 



I 



! 



r ift 5 in the par f a Guilt r- Prosecutor is a 



,Uc «- Oothcstt JT; * ,lboBref in husbandry m the 



*Kh of mat month one of the female servai. 



• 

 for '* shotting " at his bees, but the justices dismissed the com- | 

 plaint and made Pridmore pay the costs. On another occasion 

 he had summoned Pridmore for shooting at a pigeon said to be- 

 long to him. Tnc evidence of this Pridmore and ins wife was to 

 the effect, that on the night on which the offence was committed 

 the prisoner expressed to the Pridmores his determination to 

 give prosecutor a turn, and to cut down his trees and flowers. 

 For this purpose he borrowed Pridmore's hatchet, and made 

 everything ready to carry out his resolve. Pridmore went to 

 bed, 'leaving the prisoner and his wife up, the latter alleging, as 

 her excuse tor being up, that she was " stoning raisins, a job 

 which she could give no satisfactory reason for not performing 

 by daylight. Presently the prisoner asked his mistress where 

 the dusters were, and she pointed to a cupboard and nodded her 

 head. The prisoner then, according to her account, took a 

 cuple of dusters from the cupboard, tied them over his shoes, 

 took up his master's hatchet, and sallied forth on his malicious 

 errand. In half an hour he returned and informed Mrs. Prid- 

 more that he had served the prosecutor out. The prisoner's ap- 

 prenticeship having expired soon after this transaction, he left 

 Whittlesea, and after six months' lapse his late master gave in- 

 formation against him, induced by some tetter he had received 

 from the prisoner's father. Mr. Prendergast having addressed 

 the jury with great indignation at the conduct of the Pridmores, 

 Mr. Justice Patteson asked them if they could believe the evi- 

 dence they had heard ? The Jury said they could not, and im- 

 mediately Acquitted the prisoner. 



Home Circuit, Kingston'.— James Elsley, a labouring: man, 

 was indicted for the wilful murder of James Edward , 

 Lord Grantlcy's game-keeper, on the 6:h Jan. last, on the banks 

 of the Wey and Avon canal. The particulars of this case appeared 

 in this paper at the time. After a long examination, the Jury 

 found the prisoner Guilty of Manslaughter, and the Judge, after 

 observing that the prisoner had reason to be extremely grateful 

 for the lenient view the Jury had taken of the case, sentenced 

 him to be transported for life. 



Midland Circuit, Leicester. — William Beckwith, and 

 R-uhen Wu'.drom, were charged With being out on the 29th of 

 February, about eleven at night, entering with divers persons 

 unknown into a close in the occupation of Benjamin HiU, to 

 take game. Richard May, gamekeeper to Mr. Flood, of Dardon- 

 park, proved he was on duty on the morning of the 1st ot 

 larch. Observed some men go by his house, and, suspecting 

 tl w- re p< hers, he got up, calling other men to his assist- 

 ance. As he advanced, the poachers began to throw.stones. 

 The prisoner Beckwith threw one that hit the prosecutor on the 

 breast. He had a stick also, with which he struck May a fearful 

 blow on the head. Another witness identified Wa'.drom as beinj: 



one of the party who assisted in beating the prosecutor. Beck- 

 with was taken on the spot. Waldrom escaped, but was after- 

 wards taken. A previous summary con* ion by the ii:agis- 

 trates was proved against Beckwith, who was sentenced to 

 fifteen months' imprisonment and hard labour, and Waldrom to 

 twelve months* imprisonment and hard labour. — Thomas Kirbg, 

 Thomas Rodwell, Joseph Roduell, and John Porter, were 

 charged with having, on the 5\'.th November, assaulted John 

 Laxton and James Farley, with intent to do them grievous bodily 

 harm. Laxton, one of the watchers on Mr. Hartoffe's estate at 

 Burton Lazors, proved being out with James Farley on the 

 morning in question, between six and seven. They saw five 

 men and two dogs, one being a very light one, and what iey 

 call a snap dog. One of the men had a bag on his shoulder, 

 which Laxton touched, thinking it contained game or net6. An 

 assault was immediately commenced upon him, and he was 

 beaten about the head until he became insensible, and was 

 smothered with blood from the head to the feet. Two of the 

 prisoners were positively sworn to as being of the party of five 

 on the morning in question. The other two men were seen, in 

 company with Kiiby and one of the Rodwells, coming in a 

 direction from the spot in question. Mr. White adn ed their 

 identity, but contended the assault would not have taken place 

 had not Laxton, in the first instance, touched the bag on Kiiby's 

 shoulders. They were found guilty, and sentenced to twelve 

 months' imprisonment each, and hard labour. 



South Wales Circuit.— Carmarthen.— Thomas Jones, David 

 Jones, and Francis Daisies, were brought up to receive sentence 

 for a burglary committed in the parish of Moddrey. They had 

 pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced, Thomas Jones 

 and David Jones to ten years* transportation, and Franci- Davies 

 to one year's imprisonment.— John Harris, Darid Thomas, Dand 

 Williams, Job Evans, Isaac t harles, and John l*ewis, all id whom 

 had been found guilty of a riot at the Carmarthen wukhouse, 

 were sentenced as follows :— John Harris t year's imprison- 



ment, with hard labour, and the rest to eight months' imprison- 

 ment.— TAomas Hughes, Jnhn Junes, and Benjamin Jo , for 

 demolishing the Pontarlleche toll-gate, to one year's hard labour. 

 — David L t, Jonathan Jons*! Howell Lewis, Jonathan Lewis, and 

 David Davies, convicted of a riot at Tallof, eight months' hard 

 labour each.— David Thomas, John Jons, Evan Davies, John 

 Thomas, Thomas Thomas, John Thomas, And David Evans, for a 

 burglary at Pont y far, sentenced, David Thomas to transportation 

 for 20 years, and the whole of the others t > transportat on for 10 

 years. After the passing of the sentences a distressing scene 

 took place in Court ; the families of the transports threw them- 

 selves into a perfect frenzy of grief. Sobs and cries wi re heard 

 on all sides, and there was scarcely a dry eye in the Court. 



Poi.ici;.— Man'SIO.v Houss.— Thk Wii.i. Foiigkriks.— On 

 Saturday there was a great assemblage of people at the Mansion- 

 house and its vicinity, in consequence of the expectation that all 

 the parties accused of the will forgciies would be brought before 

 the Lord Mayor and committed for trial. The curiosity was in- 

 creased by the general belief that Lydia Sanders, alias " Emma 

 Slack," who pretended to be a relative of Miss Anne Slack, and 

 administered to the fictitious will by means of which the money- 

 was obtained from the hands of the Commissioners for the reduc- 

 tion of the National Debt, would arrive in London in time to be 

 brought up for examination With the rest of the accused p ies. 

 Emma Slack, however, was unable to travel, having sustained 

 so severe a shock in consequence of having, together with her 

 husband, fallen into the hands of John Forrester, the officer, as to 

 be wholly unfit for even the slight toil of travelling by railroad. 

 The other prisoners, however, were placed at the oar. Mrs. 

 Dorcy, who was attended by her husband, entered with a falter- 

 ing step, and was placed in a chair. Fletcher. Barber, Griffin, 

 and Sanders were placed behind the bar. Mrs. D rey, upon 

 turning round and seeing the husband of her sister, " Emma 

 Slack," sobbed hysterically, and became the object of the greatest 

 interest in the room. A long discussion ensued on various points, 

 and atlength the prisoners were remanded for a week.— On Monday 

 Mrs. Sanders was brought up and identified, and remanded, in 

 order that she may again appear with the other prisoners.— The 

 apprehension of Mr. and Mrs. Sanders will no doubt operate as a 

 warning to others who may be tempted to engage in fraudulent 

 undertakings under the su; sition that they may not be dis- 

 covered. In the case of these forgeries, so determined were those 

 engaged for the prosecution to discover and apprehend the parties 

 implicated, that in the early stage, before the officers could be put 

 upon the track, all persons in any way connected with Mr. and 

 Mrs. Sanders, either in London or the country, were so closely 

 watched, that they could not leave their homes, or attempt any 

 communication, personally or by letter, without the knowledge 

 of the solicitors for the prosecution, and steam, railway, and 

 animal speed was at the control of those employed la the plan of 

 detection; not a day elapsed without producing one or more 

 communications from Bristol or elsewhere respecting the result 

 of every movement ; and the two Forresters were day by day 

 attending the offices of the solicitors for the purpose of reporting 

 from time to time the progress of the investigations, and receiving 

 fresh instructions. Their labour in sifting these transactions 

 has been enormous ; and it is said that they have been frequently 

 aroused in the night in consequence of the arrival of special 

 messengers from different parts of the country. 



SPORTING. 



TATTERSALL'S. — Epsom Sprixg Mekting (YKSTKaDAV.) — 

 The Trial Slakes.— Sir G. Heathcote's Akbar, 3 yrs., beat by a 

 length; Lord G. Bentinck's Emma, 3 yrs. j Gaiety, »°peful, 

 Curate, Mespelus, Nininkin filly, and Midas. Sweeps of 5 



Sovs. each, won, in two heats, by Lord George BenUnck , 

 Croton Oil, 3 yrs., beating Moustache, the Shirme colt, ana 

 Nora Creiua. Sweepstakes of 5 Sovs. each, won intnrec 

 heats, by Lord George Bentinck's Misdeal, beating Adrian, and 

 several others. 





nanvs Service', of a son-2itli in*t ., at South- street, Park-lane, 

 fhe lady of R. R.S.-BTT, B*q., of adaughter-2ith inst at Rom- 

 ford, Essex, Mrs. B. W. Rawlivos, of a sod-2Hi list No*. 

 bury, Croydon, Mrs. A. K. Barclay, of a daughter-2ith inst., 

 at Hi' her Green, Lewisham, the Hon. Mrs. S. Rick, of a daugn- 

 ter-"5th lnat. t at Paris, the lady of H. Hall, Esq., of a s f >n — 

 •25th test., at the Ryalls, Seaton, Devonshire, the lady 0/ Major 

 Daubkvkv, C.B., of the 55th Foot, of a son— 26th inst., the lady 

 of T. G. Bkiigmav, E*q., of Formosa, Cookham, Berks, of a son 

 —26th inst., at Harrow-park, the lady of G. F. HAiiais, Esq., of 

 a daughter— 27th, at Highbury-lodge, the lady of M.I. Soares, 



Esq., of a son. . 



MARRIED.— On the 14th inst., at Edradynatc, Captain R. 

 Scott, of the Hon. East India Company's late Naval Service, to 

 Maroarkt Rods uts on, eldest daughter of J.S. Robertson, Esq., 

 of Elradvnate, Perthshire— 18th inst., at St. George's Church, 

 Hyde, G. E. Cocks, second son of the late J. Cocks, Esq., of. 

 Oldham, to Emma B. Clarke, third daughter of Capt. H. J. 

 Clarke— 20th inst., at Sands, Perthshire, H. Yovxo, Esq., ot 

 Cieish, to Mary Johvstov, third daughter of the late Laurence 

 Johnston, Esq., of Sands -20th inst, at St. Mary's, Edgewu. 

 T. Garnktt, Esq., to LOCT E. Gxkat.ikx, eldest aaghter 01 

 Mr. C. B. Grcatrex, surgeon, all of Liverpool- I ln»t., a. woh- 

 crciffe-hons-, E. Wright, only s »n of E. Wright »«•«!•; °J * 

 deth-hall, Lancashire, to Hasv Movcrkiffk, eldest jjj» u «. 

 of the late Sir David Moncreiffe, of Moncreiffe, Bjrt .-- _ •» 



at St. John's, Hackney, Mr. J. S. Boltov, of St. ^ ul » u " ke 

 yard, to Emily L. Cookk, youngest daughter of ^/^om- 

 of Cannon-street, City-26th inst., at Speldhorst, jtent, liv «H£ 

 don, Esq., only son of Sir Orford Gordon, Bart., U Ellbi* 



