THE NEWSPAPER. 



[1844. 



- . . ,),.» ot us., and 40,501 quarters at a 

 — - '"• * n.rt«r The total quantity of foreign *fa M t 

 ^11^/our Sported during the past year amounted 

 a* «fcwt » our ' V „„a the total quantity of colonial to 

 * **" q «« The total quantity of foreign and 

 HS,J» <J« r e "- d wheat flour remaining in warehouse at 

 -^ , ", b n ,,mber 1843, amounted to 220,743 quarters. 

 ^ ^ ° f Plthlv average price of wheat in England 

 «*JW* rSS 7" and the lowest 46,. 2rf., exhibit- 

 -* W ^«e^e between the two extremes of 15,. M 

 ditwrem. f ore j eD grain imported during the 



M?3 '«" " fol'o- :-vl., barle P y, 178,686 quar- 

 "" **■ /*t« tnd oatmeal, 8.,--. -* . . 



garters ; peas, «£**- ; and beans. 



m 





M Z* oatmeal, 84,597 quarters; rye and rye- 

 . J& barter.; peas, 39,6G8 quarters ; and beans, 

 ■•^ .— Tt further appears that the average 



47 ^S^ oTwheat of last year in the island of Guern- 

 mgm ^ inted to 445. per imperial quarter; and in 

 £^46.. taper imperial quarter, as far as regarded 

 i H^Uot of the island itself, bat only 4os. as regarded 

 EETwkeat The quantities imported into, and ex- 

 25 from Guernsey, were respectively 21,874 quarters, 

 ^185 quarters. In Jersey, the respective quanti- 

 *. Imported and exported amounted to 33.451 quar- 

 ry md 7ol3 quarters. The total quantity of wheat 

 !id wheat flour exported from Great Britain was 71,236 

 ^ against 1,485,495 quarters imported. The 



■ft ■ F - fi \- " V * * 9* *^ * ™ f^ 



Previa (which exports about two-thirds of the w 

 Germany, Russia, Denmark, and the North Am. 



££* wheat-exporting countries to Great Britain are 



Germany, Kussia, xyci..»a.n, »w« ™ -—. American 

 cloaks. Belgium takes the greater part of the wheat 

 n^sported from England. From another part of this 

 return we find that in the year 1842 (from the passing of 

 the new Corn Bill on the 29th of April) the total quantity 

 of foreign wheat imported was no less than 2,612,488 

 quarters, which yielded a duty of 1,093,340/. ; and thus 

 the grot total amount which has accrued to the revenue 

 of the country since the act came into operation is 

 1,(04,512/., averaging the sum of 847,256/. per annum. 

 lie average rate of duty paid in 1842 was only 8s. 4<i., 

 whereai in 1843 it was 14s. 3c/. a quarter. Finally, it ap- 

 pear! that the total quantity of corn, meal, and flour of 

 Iritb'growth imported from Ireland into Great Britain, 

 ia the year ended the 5th of January, 1844, amounted to 

 3,206,484 quarters, of which 413,466 quarters consisted 

 of wheat and wheat-flour. 



The South Seas.— The details of another attack on an 

 English whaler, and the slaughter of the whole crew by 

 the natives of one of the South Sea islands, have just been 

 recetted by the Sussex, a whale ship belonging to Mr. 

 Lyall, M.P., under the command of Captain Hammer, 

 which arrived in the Thames this week, after an absence 

 of four years and three months. The facts were ascer- 

 tained by the confession of one of the natives who commu- 

 nicated to the Captain of the Sussex that a ship was lying 

 teak m deep water in the harbour of Quollen island. 

 This proved to be true, and by rigging out a diving- 

 bell it was found that the lost vessel was the Harriet, be- 

 longing to Messrs. Boulcott, of Paul's Wharf, London, 

 which left England in 1839. It was also ascertained that 

 tae natives massacred the crew when they had come on 

 •nore for the purpose of shooting, and had afterwards 

 gone on board to murder the rest, but the persons who 

 were in the ship at the time observed the attack on their 

 •Omndes; and, seeing a number of canoes putting off to- 

 wards the vessel, they hastily embarked in a boat, and 

 have not since been heard of, the probability being that, 

 ** Atuollen's Island is situated at a long distance from any 

 ^cj, they also must have perished in the course of the 

 m* following days. 



c, llato - 



*SJ th?** , Cr J m,xal Court.— The Will Forgeries.— On Sat\ir- 

 r^TT mai of Mrs. Dorev and the others concerned in these 



-»• til 



the charge of Baron 



— «•• Dor»v f iiT'" vc '- wn u,e P ris oners nemg placed at the bar, 

 *a»*T> H# m? in a fa »iting tit. Baron Gurney proceeded to 

 ^^neeeawJ*!? the ind »ctment alleged that a Mrs. Richards, 

 ■f P«. » i f0rged a bond ' vith intent to defraud the Arch- 



— UUI) ^f - ""8 S « <* uunu, vwiu mienr 10 ueirauu wie /&rcn- 



having been J- y : and anotner count charged the fraud as 

 national d*h». ") at . t,ie commissioners for the reduction of the 



national deht r e " M, J rai xne commissione 



•*««tlielact aniK ethree P risoner ' o 



fraud. Th e cap * rendered their assistance in completing the 



80 fejtfesentaiiv, > * his -that one John Stewart had died, leaving 

 *Pplied in proner r havin S stock in the Bank, no person having 

 Afterward?, how- il WM transferred to the commissioners, 



•^ewart'a renrpsp 6 ) 61 "-' a P erson came forward, and claimed to be 

 howfcr the irwnn l Ve; and il would 1>e for the J ury to (letennine 

 °g the stock r u aided a:id assisted in thus falsely re-trans- 

 ili haln f to he t* ; ■ t the commissioners into the name of a person 



■*> falsely 



?*•»* to beltr c the c °mmi 5 8ioner& ..„ - r 



1 «itm 8 j i ewarl » but who ' il had since to* 3 " discovered 



[^ifJtula'feFthp^ S 4t name - Thc Earned Baron then minutely 

 *** * hearine timf V ld . ence which had been produced, so far as it 

 *od commented in n !u various acts of the respective prisoners, 



* Dorey. n tp r poinls as the y referred to Barber, Fletcher, 

 :«ared to th-nk t? lag , e evi dence of one witness, in which he 



* it, the learned t . e had seen Barber, but was not quite sure 

 m ** on. In refl? dffe told the Juf y that il was t0 ° sli g ht t0 be 



>n re P r ntino -h K ^° the in dictment as to the age of the 

 -l^rtant point fi?r tl f to be Miss Stewart, it was certainly au 

 fere only f ortv ' ,:V • consi deration of the Jury, because if she 

 "oman who it i ?'l U P rove d that that could not be the decrepit 



Person 

 ■"Port 



*ere 

 oid 



« woman who i l" Proved that that could not be the decrepit 



It **« affair t„ i a f, becn stated > had originally given instructions 

 ZV n * knowindv nt« i er ' a , nd was so far in favour of Barber not 

 * t^Portant to fem.?Ii CC u a Wron " P erson i and he thought it to 

 ?? *> the mistal^e ! ' hat When Barber was applied to in refer- 



2? Without JriSJi a wron g Payment of 3/. 3s. 9d., he at once, 

 «is« Srp... ' ne * tation, K ave the ri<rh» n .i^ M .. ~e *i ' w „.„%««h 



C ,gtn °winclvnr^ ' , was 80,ar m favour ot Barner not 

 * toportant to rVm^vfu a wron g P erson i and he thought it to 

 2? to the mht^l ■ ■ at wuen Barber was applied to in refer- 

 2? Without hesit^i! a wron & P a yment of 3/. 3s. 9d., he at once, 

 S" Stewart, whirh J-^ gave th « "ght address of the presumed 

 TV* tb * Parties who uIa i" 0t appear as if n e was anxious to keep 

 iJJ '^rned Baron ti»/« r en co,,n ected with him in this atTair. 

 S** id that the Jury' e " re t ferred to ^ confession of Mrs. Dorey, 

 t^^^^^\^^y^«A against any portion of 



Sd euht '«- Fletcher nr i, ° we, « h u l ,on their minds, as it re- 



Ent*?*' th « thev w««ll r 6r ' and he 8hould relv u I ,on their 

 hS- 1 but the Jnry Ln^l? ? latin «tii»h upon thia most important 



i ?£ tra ction Twa, In ! Ut «*<>««* that Mrs. Dorey's part 



2*W wel, knew *«J. to s ay the least of it, a most improper one, 



SftffP'^ °' PletcWa means il was intended to get into 

 *•*. he wat not enti ^ •? n ° f mone >' t0 "Wch, she was well 



«"ea. in conclusion, Baron Gurney said it 



is for the Jury to consider what part each of the prisoners at the 1 

 bar took in the transaction; and said, that ards B . who 



was a professional man, it should be recollected that a witness had 

 said hfi gave the name of Clarence Beckham, but he had given hi 

 right residence in Nelson-square, and had invited thc wit; to 

 visit him; and he had clearly established that his visit was 

 in June, which was a fact of importance, as he was charged as an 

 accessory before the fact ; and the bond was sworn to after this 

 period. It had been alleged thatamistake was made by witness as to 

 the time of that visit; and a bill was put into his hand, with the 

 view of showing that the time when Barber visited him must have 

 been in October following: and the jury must take th3t point into 

 their serious consideration, because, if that be the fact, then there 

 was no evidence as against Barber, he being charged with being an 

 accessory before the fact, which he could not be if he did not visit 

 Great Marlow till the latter month. If the evidence of Grifrir.were 

 looked at, it would be seen that Barber remained in the outer office 

 of Mr. Potts till the business was completed; and his frequent at- 

 tendance at the Bank, as the attorney for the parties, was certainly 

 quite regular and professional, so far as that attendance was consi- 

 dered by itself. Another point of importance was that, though a 

 large sum of money had been obtained, yet it had not at all been 

 shown that Barber was ever in possession of such a sum as might 

 have been supposed to be his share in this fraudulent transaction ; 

 but, on the contrary, that he was comparatively a poor man, and 

 that he never received more than was a regular professional pay- 

 ment for services of this description. In regard to Mrs. Dorey, he 

 need not trouble the jury with any observations, because her con- 

 fession had rendered that course quite unnecessary. Relative to 

 the prisoner Fletcher, he had taken a very conspicuous part in this 

 nefarious transaction, and the evidence admitted of no doubt what- 

 ever, as it applied to him, especially in regard to Mr. Christmas, a 

 clerk in the Bank, whom Fletcher had corrupted to depart from his 

 duty. If the jury were satisfied that Mrs. Dorey represented Miss 

 Stewart, then it was clearly made out that both she and Fletcher 

 were accessories before the fact ; and all that had been said in the 

 statement of that unfortunate woman was fully confirmed by the 

 testimony of Griffin. He had now performed the task which had 

 been allotted him ; and if they believed the testimony in regard 

 to Mrs. Dorey, she must be guilty; if they believed the evidence 

 against Fletcher, they must return a verdict of guilty; but with 

 respect to Barber, the only point that could criminate him was the 

 fact of his going to Marlow ; if that visit were in June, then he was 

 guilty; but if his visit did not take place till October, then he must 

 be acquitted ; but these were points which must be left to the serious 

 deliberation of the jury. The learned baron then concluded his 

 summing up, which occupied three hours, after which the jury re- 

 tired to consider their verdict, and while they were absent the Court 

 withdrew for refreshment. The jury were only absent about fifteen 

 minutes when they returned; the most intense anxiety was mani- 

 fested, the prisoners being immediately replaced in the dock, all of 

 whom looked most anxiously at the jury, who found William Henry 

 Barber not guilty. Joshua Fletcher guilty, Georgiana Dorey, gui'ty. 

 —On Tuesdav. the same prisoners, Mrs, Dong* W. H. Barber, 

 and Joshua Fletcher, were placed at the bar with William and 

 Lydia Sanders, charged with forging the will of Miss Anne Slack. 

 As the details of this case are familiar to our readers, it is only 

 necessary to state that the abstract of the indictment on which the 

 prisoners were arraigned, set forth that in the year 1842 there was 

 a sum of 3500/. consols king in the name of Anne Slack, the divi- 

 dends on which, not having been claimed for upwards often years, 

 the entire had been conveyed to the commissioners for the reduction 

 of the national debt. It then proceeded to charge a person un- 

 known with forging a testamentary document purporting to be the 

 last will and testament of Anne Slack, deceased, bequeathing the 

 above sum of 3500/. consols to one Emma Slack, with intent to de- 

 fraud Anne Slack; and the prisoners, Lydia Sanders, Barber, 

 Fletcher, William SandeTS, and Georgiana Dorey, as accessories 

 before the fact to the said forgery. In the second count Lydia 

 Sanders and W. H. Barber were charged with uttering the forged 

 document, well knowing it to be forged, and the other prisoners 

 with being accessories before the fact. The third and fourth counts 

 were similar to the first and second, only charging the intent with 

 being to defraud the Governor and Company of the Bank of Eng- 

 land. The fifth and sixth were also similar, but laying the intent 

 as being to defraud Charles ShawLefevre and others commissioners 

 for the reduction of the national debt. There were other counts, 

 charging William Henry Barber as principal in forging the before- 

 named document, and the other prisoners with being accessories 

 before the fact. Mr. Erie stated the case for the prosecution, and 

 examined numerous witnesses to show that a clerk in the Bank of 

 En-land, named Christmas, had means of knowing what stock re- 

 mained unclaimed as regarded the dividends for ten years and up- 

 wards, and consequently what sums, and to whom they originally 

 belonged, were about to be transferred to the credit of the commis- 

 sioners for the reduction of the national debt ; that in the autumn 

 of 1S42, Christmas informed the prisoner Fletcher that a sum of 

 3500/. stock, in the Three per Cent. Consols, standing in the name 

 of Ann Slack, of South-street, Chelsea, spinster, was about to be 

 transferred to the commissioners for the reduction of the national 

 debt, as unclaimed for a term of ten years, and that Fletcher at 

 once proceeded to make his arrangements to secure this sum with 

 the assistance of the other prisoners ; that more than a year before 

 this Barber and Fletcher were co-operating together m respect to 

 dividends due on stock ; and that they were acquainted with one 

 another and did business together previous to the commencement 

 of Barber's transactions with Fletcher in his professional capacity. 

 Miss Slack proved that the handwriting to the will was not hers, 

 and that she had given no one authority to sign her name, and in 

 fact had never made a will. The trial continued during the whole 

 of Wednesday and Thursday, and did not conclude until last 

 night. After Mr. Erie had been heard in reply to Mr. Wilkins 

 and Mr. Greaves, on the part of the prisoners, Mr. Justice VV U- 

 liams summed up, and told the Jury to admit nothing for their 

 consideration except what appeared in the evidence before 

 them. They must discard everything which had been said by- 

 counsel on both sides, except so far as it was founded upon 

 the evidence. The first thing he had to remark was, that 

 there was no evidenc? at all as to the actual person who 

 forged the will; but that did not dispose of the important 

 case before them, for there was no doubt that the will was 

 forged. As he referred to the evidence, he should make such 

 observations upon it as he thought proper, but if the jury 

 did not coincide with him as to their justness, they would of 

 course disregard them. With regard to Lydia Sanders, the 

 case against her rested a good deal on the testimony ot 

 the Nevilles, but there were two or three others who spoke of 

 her with more or less certainty as being mixed up in the 

 transaction. With regard to Barber, the main and pressing 

 question for their consideration was, whether he had acted 

 truly and solely as an attorney, fairly employed without 

 any guilty knowledge of the will being forged. mere 

 was no doubt that it was Barber who tendered the will 

 for probate. There was no question raised upon tnat 

 point, but it was said that this and everything else whicti 

 he did in the transaction was done as an attorney. it 

 had been proved that he received 600/., and that he went 

 away with it, but what he did with it afterward* » obo ^ 

 knows. Whether he returned it to the supposed owner, or 

 whether he appropriated it to himself, they had no "**»■?[ 

 judcing. That part of the case which required their most serious 

 consideration was the negotiations which were carried j do in ine 

 autumn of 1812. Who induced or directed Mr. Barber J^J"£S 

 Captain Foskett, they had no proof. He had Mflfttadl ^£"»~ 

 him that the subject on which he was inquiring wa* jor ire 

 benefit of Miss Slack, for he asked whether she wan a person of 

 nerves strong enough to bear au addition of a large sura or 

 money to heV means. After thc correspondence wMch had 

 taken place between Mr. Barber and Capr. |osWetti^t would »,e 

 for them to consider whether Barber had not bee n the i real 

 person to whom the money belonged. The next thing they would 



consider was the conduct of Mr. Barber after thi6 correspondence 

 The general result of the evidence of Mr. Freshfield and 

 Capt. Foskett wa< to raise an inf nee against Mr. Barber, but 

 whether it did so or not was for the consideration of the Jury. 

 When the whole of the evidence and documents were before 

 them, they would consider whether Mr. Barber was in such a 

 position as would have led him to suppose that the will was a 

 forgery. When Mr. Freshfield told him he was suspected, it was 

 for them to say whether he ought not to have said that he was 

 only an attorney in the case, and that he acted throughout for 

 Fletcher. After some further observations, the learned Judge 

 told them that, if the evidence was such as to leave a just and 

 reasonable doubt on their minds, the prisoners should have the 

 benefit; but if there was no doubt on their minds, they would 

 give their verdict accordingly. He again begged of the jury not 

 to regard any observations which were addressed to them, 

 except so far as they were founded on the evidence. The 

 question they had to consider with regard to the prisoner 

 Barber was, whether he had merely acted as an ordinary 

 attorney would act in the matter, or whether he had produced 

 the will for probate, well knowing it to have been forged ? The 

 Jury then retired to consider their verdict. The prisoner, 

 Barber, seemed to have retained his self-possession throughout 

 the trial, frequently handing down notes to his counsel, till the 

 close of the Judge's charge; he then appeared to become ex- 

 tremely agitated and nervous. After an absence of about an 

 hour and twenty minutes, the Jury returned with a verdict of 

 GUILTY AGAINST ALL THE PRISONERS, except Sanders, 

 who had been acquitted at an early atagc of the trial. Mr. 

 Barber— I am not guilty, my Lord, and Mr. Fletcher here knows 

 that I am not. The prisoners were then removed. 



Murder.— Mara Furley, aged 36, married, was indicted for the 

 wilful murder of her infant son, George Fur . The prisoner 

 had been an inmate of thc workhouse at Bethnal Green, where 

 she complained she was separated from her two children. She 

 left the workhouse, and for a while supported herself by shirt- 

 making, at which she could earn only ljd. each shirt. Oa the 

 20th March she was taken out of thc canal, and the body of her 

 younger child was observed to hlip from her grasp. With some 

 difficulty she was restored, but the child was quite dead. Her 

 defence was that on that day she had been robbed of her trifling 

 earnings, and had nothing but destitution before her and her 

 children. The jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Mr. Justice 

 Manle passed sentence of death, telling thc prisoner to prepare her- 

 self for her fate, as he could holdout no hope of a commutation of 



the sentence. 



Destruction of the brig Collina.—Wm. Read, a shipowner at 

 Ipswich was charged with having incited and procured one Wm. 

 Simpson feloniously and maliciously to cast away and destroy a 

 certain vessel called the Collins, on the high sea, within the ju- 

 risdiction of the Admiralty of England and also of the Central 

 Criminal Court, with intent to prejudice clivers persons as pait 

 owners of or underwriters to the said vessel. There were several 

 other counts in the indictment, in one of which the Captain of 

 the vessel (Simpson) was named as the principal in the felony. 

 The prosecution was instituted by the Alliance Marine Insurance 

 Company, which refused to pay the insurance effected on the 

 vessel, and brought this action in consequence of rumours that 

 she had been wilfully destroyed. The trial lasted two days. 

 Mr. Justice Maule in summing up pointed out various 

 inconsistencies in the evidence as affecting the prisoner, and 

 dwelt on the strong testimony to character which had been 

 adduced in his favour. The jury almost immediately returned a 

 verdict of Not Guilty. The prisoner Simpson, upon whose con- 

 fession the previous case mainly depended, was then brought to 

 the bar, and asked whether he had anything to say why judgment 

 should not be passed upon him according to law ? The prisoner 

 replied—' 4 I have spoken nothing but thc truth.** The judge told 

 him he stood convicted, on his own confession, of a very heinous 

 offence, and he much aggravated it by an attempt to implicate 

 and jeopardise the lives of others. "You are either guilty of the 

 crimeof perjury, which is not so punishable as that of casting 

 awav a vessel, or you have in reality sunV the ship." Prisoner— 

 • I did so, my Lord." Mr. Justice Maule-" Your case is one in 

 which I can see no mitigating circumstances; the sentence of 

 the Court, therefore, is, that you be transported for life. 



BIRTHS.— lOthinst., at Maida-hill, the lady of S. D. Nickli.v, 

 Esq., ofa daughter— llth inst., at Alderholt-park. Hants, Mrs. 

 J M Kkv, of a daughter— 13th inst., in Curzon- street, Mrs. W. 

 H. Brabant, of a son— 13th inst., at 240, Black friar*-road, the 

 wife of Mr. R.Tkbbitt, surgeon, of twins, girls-13th inst., at 

 her father's house, Ipswich, the lady of Major W. M. N. Sturt, 

 Bengal Army, of ason— 13th inst., at Nottingham, the wife of 

 C. F. Gaaoo, Esq., Enniskillen Dragoons, of a son - 1 3th inst., 

 in Devonshire-street, Portland-place, the wife of A. B. Cms. 

 holm, Esq., of a daughter— 13th inst., at Nonesuch-park, Sur- 

 rey, the lady of W. F. G. Farmbr, Esq., of a daughter. 



MARRIED.— 9»h inst., at St. Mary's, Bathwick, Bath, the 

 Rev. G. L. Harvbv, rector of Yate, son of the late Sir Ludford 

 Harvey, to Persis Scott Nicholi.s, only child of Captain 

 Nicholls, formerly of the 3d Bnffs-lOth inst., at Tintagel, in the 

 county of Cornwall, Ann E. C. S. Brkk, aaughter of the Rev. 

 R. S. Bree, to the Rev. E. M. Sanovs— 10th inst., at Warbltng- 

 ton Church, Hants, the Rev. C. B. Hbnvi«,lr, Fellow of Win- 

 chester College, and rector of Hanble le Rice and Bursledon, 

 near Southampton, to M. Lino McARTHua, dauebter of Thos. 

 Meik, M.D., many years physician to the garrison of Ports- 

 mouth, and widow of the late John McArthur.of Hay field-lodge, 



Hampshire. «.,-». 



DIED.— 29th March, at Rome, of gastric fever, J C. mamlbj, 



Esq., eldest son of J. S. Manley, Esq.. of Manley-hall, : Stafford- 

 shire, aged 21 -30th utt., atMalton Abbey, \orkshire . C. Sanm- 

 sov Esq aged 40-*d inst., at Rome, after a week s illne>s, 

 Sank EuxaYwh Rawso.v, relict of the late Sir W. Rawson 

 and daughter of the late Colonel Rawson, of Belmont, 

 ciunty Wteklow-ad inst., at Rome, on her return from India, 

 AbTkk NicoiLs. the beloved wife of Lieutenant- General Sir 

 jrrMcXwB, aged6l-9th inst., at Hawley-square, 

 Mar^e MarVavvB.Ukr, daughter of the late John Baker, 

 Fsn aeed62-10th inst., at Ostend, Charlotte Currv, wife 

 ofET Curry. Esq., her Majesty's Consul at that place-lOth 

 inst' at Woodlands, Manchester, Eliz. Hrnrv, wife of Alex. 

 Henrv E«q.— 1 1 tU inst., at Gatcombe Rectory, Isle of Wight, 

 the Rev H Worslkv, D.D., rector of Gatcombe, Isle of Wight, 

 andofWolverton, Hants, aged 89-1 lth inst., at Edinburgh, 

 after many years of suffering, in consequence of a wound re- 

 ceived at the battle of Vittoria, Colonel Wm. Hay, eldest son of 

 the late General Sir James Hay, K C.iL, Colonel of the 2d Drag. 

 Guards— 1 Hh inst, at Kibworth, Leicestershire, the Rev. Wm. 

 RicssTTs, rector of that parish, and late Fellow of Merton Col- 

 lege, Oxford, aged 41 ; also at the same place, on the following 

 day/ his brother, C. M. Rickktts, Esq., aged 51— 12th inst., at 

 Addiscombe-road, Croydon, Mr. W. B. Lash mar, eldest son of 

 the late William L«shmar, of Chiddingly, Sussex, aged 56— 12th 

 inst., Rachkl Louisa Rbkvss, of Portland-street, Clapham-rd., 

 third daughter of the late Rev. Jonathan Reeves, of West Ham, 

 Essex, and sifter of the late Rev. Jonathan Reeves, late Fellow 

 of King's College, Cambridge— 12th inst., at 14, Curs-m street, 

 after a very short illness, Ai.kx. J. Hope, the eldest son of G. 

 W. Hope, Esq., M.P., aged 5 years— 13th inst., at No. 7, Bl orns- 

 bnrv-square, C. H. Lk Brktov, the infant son of P. H. Le Bre- 

 ton, Esq.— ISth inst., A. Mo Mao, Esq., of Blackheath-park, agea 

 42-13th inst, of consumption, Mariannb A. . Ha " dy ' ^ , 3 

 daughter ot Mr. W. If. Hardy, of Fleet-street, ^T uim^on. 



7months-14th inst.. at Montague- place » JJ' 1 "* t ^ 



r. Groom, of Aiaersgare 





ling- t-iospiiHi— /i" i"»i',oi «*- -*—i 



meath. the Right Hon. Loan d* Bvaqvi**^ 



