APR- 27 'J 



^L— — ., »,„_ hTwaTcaliedoo to decide what 

 , JTBriTsaid, when he was to dQ go Mr 



' Jfctended to pursue, he shou wMch Mr phinQ 



^ 1 den d hat be had in any way alluded to 



m __ Hr. Pninn ^K a d carefully abstained from doing so. 



M * HEa* client "h Mend had spoken of his client having 



J£ 5&.-Hi. ^n^orsuperior judgment Mr. Justice 



^tefflPtedbV^urt had not understood that any allusion 

 *** ^d the Court haa eg then retire d to con 



J^nmadetoMr-Baroer. k d after an absence of 



2 • what coarse they , sftoul th re t,irned into Court, upon 



*** quarter °J a ^"Vaving called the prisoners seve- 

 £ the clerk ofanaigns, na * _ onvictcd of felori y,and 



THE NEWSPAPER. 



•Scb the clerk o« arn»B j»> convicted of felony, and 



STbT ° ame ' told them tl e> n gentcnce c f the Court 



Sldiem what ^/^/them ? Mr. Barber then proceeded 

 Xdd not be P^ h U f 01 \ue court, in order to show that he 

 Smake a Ion* *f eec n \ of Fletc her. H e said he was aware 



Ji been made th n e ™"™ im imp lied whether he had any legal 

 CtheqaeiUOBPattohim d P however ^ that their Lordships 



faction to maw. " making some observations on 



SEdnot pr e dude him iro^ wnich he had bee n con- 



tfce reneral natwe o witnesses were called for his 



^"&5?fnot mean by this to cast the .least reflection 



""' --i to whom he could never be too grateful, and 

 - W«connel townom nd nis eternal gratitu de. 



^fitZ however, that at the conclusion of the 

 He w,sh ^ d rtpmin's soeech had he (Mr. Barber) been asked 

 L T? d £moX ft necessary to have any witnesses called, he 

 ^^r, said he did not think it was. He had, however, 



^ni tan evJdenc 'which he might have called. A system 

 rtTJ important euaw d against him by that man (pomt- 



" deCf ?^ n h,rf Fletcner-No, no. Mr. Barber said he had 

 Kif^idretiocrette Mr. Fletcher's difficulties, but 

 STSJhTfui circumstances in which he was placed were owing 

 J^S? F etcher All the misery he had suffered had been 

 k ht IS bv him, and was attributable to that confidence 

 *T? hf*a Educed to repose in Mr. Fletcher, whom he had 

 n W oUhe leU ^ a reason" suspect up to the present time He hoped 

 STZuldbe able to satisfy their Lordships by something: more 

 JlanWtions of this kind. He then went on to say that he 

 wouM explain the course which had been adopted towards him 

 h» Fletcher in reference to Miss Slack's case. The correspond- 

 ed had been already laid before their Lordships, but the most 

 important feature in the history of this transaction he could not 

 brine before their Lordships. It was this. Fletcher said it is 

 likelr that this young lady (Miss Slack) is entitled to this stock. 

 He 'Barber' had said he did not think there was much doubt of 

 it and thought it must be so. He said, however, there was a 

 means by which he could decide the matter most completely, 

 and that if he (Barber) could procure the handwriting, he would 

 have it compared with the signature in the Bank book. He did 

 so, and procured a letter with the signature of Miss Slack. 

 Fletcher thereupon gotit compared with the Bank books, as pro- 

 cured by Christmas. Respecting the answer which he got from 

 Fletcher as to the result of that comparison, he had no means 

 of verifying it; but Fletcher told him that the handwriting 

 did not agree at all, and that his friend had compared it with 

 the signature in the Bank books. He declared that the sig- 

 nature in the Bank books was that of an elderly person, while 

 the signature of Miss Slack was that of a young lady, and that 

 it was therefore quite certain that she was not the owner of the 

 stock. He t Barber) then expressed his regret and surprise, but 

 Fletcher said he was quite satisfied, and stated that the lady had 

 executed a power of attorney before the dividends on the stock 

 had ceased to be received. He entreated their Lordships to re- 

 ■enber that Captain Foskett had said that Miss Slack was about 

 27 years of age; he admitted that in his evidence Fletcher upon 

 this said it could not be the same party, as she would not have 

 been competent to make a power of attorney at the period at 

 which she had executed it, if she was only 27 years of age then. 

 Coupling these facts together, he had come to the conclusion, 

 firmly and honestly, that Miss Slack was not the same person as 

 she in whose name the stock was invested, but that she was 

 qu.te a different party. In a letter which he had written to Mr. 

 outer (Captain Foskett's attorney), he (Barber) had promised 

 that if the right party had been found out he would give him 

 information or it, for the satisfaction of the young lady and the 

 tumlf. Now, when he wrote that letter he intended either to 

 seep that promise or he did not. If he intended to keep it, it 

 could not be argued that he had a guilty knowledge, and if he 

 c« not, ha should not have made it, as it was perfectly unneces- 

 sary; but he did make it, and he intended to have kept it, and he 

 am keep it. He did not, unfortunately, write a letter ; but after 

 wis party (Emma Slack) had come forward, he met Mr. Baxter 



w», ,„ J nu " fields » and inarmed him that the person who 

 *» reajiy the owner had come forward and produced a will. 



tweenn 161 " Sa ' d ' " Ah ' indeed '• " and the correspondence be- 

 trntl r™ then st0 PPed; and that casual meeting was a 

 Baxter ! t0 hitn ( Barb er), for, had he not met Mr. 



been* -i e shou,u nave written a letter, which would have 

 He hid en . ln his books, and have been produced at the trial, 

 the h^« i thHt Fletcner had deceived him in reference to 

 had nn? k Wm L ng ' but he was cot Q uite sure tliat Mr - Fletcher 

 of Chr t eceivea himself. It appeared from the evidence 



thesienst l l! at he S ave rather a doubtful description of 

 ae stirwi i e 1 wh ether he did or not, it certainly appeared 

 •waerfti i W,s * Slack » of Abbott's Langley, was not the 

 tt t»»ct from' S i° Ck ' Mr ' Fletcher produced to him (Barber) an 

 the Bank h ,^ T ' and said ne had received it from a friend at 

 ^er this'nroV . ber ) never knew who that friend was till 

 •imply ag - secu »on had been commenced. He spoke of him 

 alluded to atlV^ at the Bank. The extract from the letter 



a*iuded to stat d nana. Tne extract irom me leuer 



016 name of M *- at tnere was stock in the Bank standing in 

 '* Abbott's Lan f k ' formerlv of Smith -street, Chelsea, now 



**"» time he at? ' bUt that was not tne same P erh ° n ' During 

 Wn 'ch hii par tn U , ed R cas e at the Croydon assi7.es, during 

 0e a»in thiscag *r BircftRm » attended to Mr. Fletcher's busi- 

 ietter, and tiir,^' *-Barber then produced the extract from the 

 * k )ou'r h> I * t0 Mr - Fletcher, said, '« You will admit this 

 ^fdshipg wouiH UUm,ne *" Fle tcher admitted it was.] Their 

 S^tnstances hv S6 k- how im P° rtarit th is was. There were two 

 J 1 * Slack was Wmcn he arrived at a certain conviction that 

 J* nQ aTitin e wL DC !-J he ow «er of the property-one that the 

 ■* Te «ecuted Th dlfferent . a «d the other that she could not 

 on «,w_ . uine power of attorney, which it appeared she had, 



of toe convaixi- age ' He nad said to Captain Foskett. in one 

 Ration apnearp^ 8 ' that 40 >ears of a e e would do. The pro- 



• E t0 'd in h;- ,° tblnk ^at was against him, but see how 



J? »ay, it was on VOUr ' Fort y > ears would do > tnat was 



* "^t most PYtr lSt f nt with othe r circumstances; and was 



w * WiOSt PYtr I "**■« VIUJC1 U1I CUIUS IdiH-v.o , »i*« ttwo 



Jarried the lad v ' ° rQlnary that Captain Foskett, who had 

 *'• w hen i B fart ;♦ 8lst er, should have slated that her age was 

 * Li ch there w»L S 37 ' Atter some further observations, in 

 * r 'd over, that h„ cons »derable repetition, he declared, over 

 Seer's victim W ? n,isled oy Fletcher ; that he had been 

 2? tr 7»ndresieo; Q K, t e then a PPealed to the life of in- 

 ***** time and I h « ty which he had led from boyhood to the 

 8 °rr,'e rleacp? ! d by Callin & on Fletcher, as he hoped 

 ~---.uerj hftihoo? 1 m ?ments in his later life, to declare that 

 2 r iP n » of the cw\ ; CVlctim of nis (Fletcher's) deception, and 

 ?^ n * called oSrhr? !? end itS m ercy to him.-Mr. Fletcher 

 15?' barber had hi - the . onua u P° n Christmas, and said that 

 Spot others 'J L? deceived . he had himself been made the 

 t! Cn lo ng affected uSh^- 1 " ' 6 desi e n >n& than he was. He had 



gcjttia liv e ntanv 1 v d ' SeaSe ° f the hcart - »e did not believe 

 ^urt tp;i„. "'any years, and h« i—^i^^j .,._ _* .u„ 



tnjoy 



h * (Ba rb 



>nh, 



others, and as 



^ '" ^'S power for whit k/ *."? as he had made ev ery tepara- 



aron g 



urnev ti 7 l wo fema le prisoners said nothing. 

 *y then proceeded to pass sentence on the 



prisoners. Addressing Fletcher first he said— that he had been | 

 found guilty upon two indictments of the crime of felony— that ' 

 a few years ago he would have expiated with his life 

 the crime of which he had been found guilty— that his 

 crime was aggravated from the . respectable position he 

 occupied in society. He then sentenced him to trans- 

 portation for life. With regard to Mr. Barber, he said that 

 he had been found guilty as an accessory before the fact, after a 

 patient and long trial. The Learned Judge who tried him had 

 acquiesced in the finding of the Jury, and his opinion was not 

 altered after the statement which the prisoner had marie. Hi-, 

 crime was also very much aggravated from the fact of his being 

 a respectable attorney, and the sentence of the Court was, that 

 he be transported beyond the seas for the term of his natural 

 life. With regard to William Sanders, the Court distinguished 

 his guilt from that of the others, and believing him to have been 

 misled, the sentence of the Court was, that he be transported for 

 7 years. With respect to the two female prisoners, as they had 

 been instruments in the hands of others, and as one of them 

 (Mrs. Dorey), had made all the atonement in her power, by 

 making a confession which furthered the ends of justice, the 

 sentence of the Court upon them was, that they be kept in con- 

 finement for 2 years. The prisoner Fletcher sunk into his seat 

 when sentence had been pronounced. Barber seemed deeply 

 affected at first, but soon recovered his usual calm manner, and 

 the female prisoners were both in tears. It is stated that since 

 the conviction of the prisoners some important disclosures have 

 been made, and it is expected that Fletcher will now make a full 

 disclosure of the whole facts, by which, it is stated, that another 

 celebrated firm will be implicated. 



William Brown, gardener, was indicted for feloniously receiving 

 two books and a number of knives and forks, the property of the 

 Rev J Singleton. It was proved that the property was found in 

 the house of the prisoner; but the evidence failed to show that he 

 received it with a guilty knowledge, and he was accordingly Ac- 

 quitted. The prisoner was next indicted for receiving, knowing 

 them to have been stolen, several articles of property belonging to 

 Mr. Thomas Scott, of Wendon, in Essex. From the evidence in 

 this case it appeared that on the night of the 25th January last the 

 house of the prosecutor had been broken into and a great variety of 

 property stolen. A part of the goods carried away had been found 

 on the premises of the prisoner ; and at the late assizes at Chelms- 

 ford, Matthew Hall Cuttriss and John Bennet had been found 

 guilty of the burglary, and sentenced to transportation for life. Ihe 

 goods produced were clearly identified, and the prisoner was found 

 Guilty A police sergeant was then called into the witness-box, 

 and stated that he had frequently seen the prisoner m company of 

 convicted thieves, and had so strong a suspicion of his honesty that 

 he kept a close eye upon him. The prisoner was sentenced to ten 

 years' transportation.-TAe Lady Shop lifters.- Ann Elizabeth 

 Earnshaw, aged 34, married, and Emma Wells aged 28, spinster, 

 were indicted for stealing a silver knife, value 6.. Or/ the property 

 of Mary Ann Rose. From the evidence it appeared, that on the 

 17th February last, the prisoners entered the shop of theprosecutrix 

 in Farringdon-street, and asked to see some silver fruit knives. 

 They left without purchasing any, and immediately afterwards the 

 prosecutrix missed one. She sent her boy after the prisoners, and 

 he saw them enter a pawnbroker's shop. He B* v \ ^J» ° to fft ^ 

 tody, and on being searched at the station-house a knife was found 

 concealed about the person of Wells, which the prosecutrix denti- 

 fied as one of those which she had shown to the prisoners, though 

 it was not the one she had missed. Mr. Clarkson addressed the 



uJv for the defence, and having urged that Mrs. Rose could not 

 be positive that her shopman had not sold the knife on some 

 previous occasion, contended that Mrs. Earnshaw was ; no impli- 

 cated in the transaction, the possession not havi ^heenUaced to 

 her in any manner. Several witnesses gave a character for high 

 respectability to the prisoners, who had lived in respectable lodgings 

 a Sen-town. Mrs. Earnshaw was P« M ^^. a ^"^^ 

 income, and Miss Wells lived with her as a companion. The Re- 

 corder summed up the evidence, and the jury after a short consulta- 

 tionretumed a verdict of Guilty against Wei s, ^^ J*™*** 

 They begged to add a strong recommendation to mercy on behalf of 

 Weft. The Recorder advised them to wait. The > prisoners > we e 

 again indicted for stealing two diamond rings, ratoe U. 7*. Sd.^ihe 

 nronertv of Thomas Clapham. The evidence was of a similar 

 desLTption. The prisoners went together to the shop of the prose- 

 cutorYn the Strand, and asked to be shown some rings. 1 hey left 

 w" bout purchasing, and the rings were not missed until a con- 

 stable showed them to the prosecutor, they having been found in 

 the wr ting-desk of Miss Wells. For the same reason as m the 

 tmlrcasS, namely, the want, of proof of possession ^ --ga^ed 

 Farn<haw the jury again acquitted her, and found Wells guilty. 

 The nrisoneiswe^re then indicted for stealing a gold watch, value 

 30 ertyof John Smith. It appeared that the prisoners 



nid'ffoneto ?S -Smith's shop, in the Strand, about the mddle of 

 Februan- and asked to be shown some watches They complained 

 of the mices "of those in the first tray, and wished to see sorne about 

 6 T lev left without purchasing, and the watch was not missed 

 until a constable applied to the shopman, and showed him a watch 



h ch Miss Well? had handed to the constable in c barge of the 

 station-house, saying it was hers, and desiring that it eh ou d be 



taken care of. The shopman at once ™W^*g™'£ e t™ 

 which he had shown to the prisoners, and on referring to the tray, 

 hptce was found vacant. The value of the watch was 30/ Ihe 

 Recorder summed up, and directed the attention of the : jury to he 



facts and circumstances attending these cases J r ^ ar V^hs ?he 

 to-ether occupying the same sitting and bedroom, Wells, the 

 poorer? having no means of purchasing an expensive watch, and 

 th£ imnossimlity of her possession of it being unknown to the 

 other id oner The jurv after a long consultation, returned a 

 verdict of guilty against both prisoners. They were again indicted 

 for s teaUng a gold locket, value 20,., the property of George Lamb. 

 The "e. * dence was similar to that in the other cases. 'Ihe prisoners 

 hid pledged the locket with the pawnbroker into whose shop ,Mw 

 Rose's boy had traced them. The jury at once returned a veidict 

 of Guilty against both prisoners. The Recorder addressed them 

 and I sa Wthat the apparent respectability of the elder prisoner had 

 re vailed in the first tried cases, but on further investigation it ap- 

 eared that she was not only an accomplice of the other, but even 

 E for she not only confederated with her, but threw the chances 

 of conviction far more upon her than she was liable to herself. It 

 was melancholy to see persons committing such crimes, unactua.ed 

 by the motive of distress, which was so frequently urged teiarag 

 tion of similar offences, when committed by persons in an humbler 

 sphere of life. The Court, in the performance of its dutj , should 

 hold the scales of justice even, and if circumstances could be shov.n 

 calculated so render a more lenient sentence than that about to be 

 passed upon them sufficient, they should be laid before the proper 

 authorities. The sentence of the Court was, that they he »everall> 

 transported for the term of seven years. Wells fainted on turning 

 from the bar. The othej prisoner was removed crying bitterly. 



SPORTING. 



NEWMARKET FIRST SPRING MEETING. 

 Monday—50/. for four ;i r-olds, J ' tt lOlbs; five ,8 ^sl : Qlb«i ^ 

 and aged 9 st. Last three miles of B.C. Lord Albemarle » The 

 Brewer, 4 vrs, beat by a length Mr. Watson's Antidote, 4 y». 

 Lord Exeter's Czar, 4 yrs; and Mr. Roger's Prosody, 5 yrs. 

 Sweepstakes, of 100 sovs each, for colts Bst Qlbs^ and n ' es « « st 

 51bs. R.M. (4 subs.) Lord Glasgow's c by \ elociptde and 



Duke of Beaufort's Claude Frollo ; had a d ^ d , he ^Ld over - 

 which the colt broke down, and Claude ^^walked o ve r. 

 Sweep***, of ioo sovs, h ft, for allien, Jat f If/**-; gg 



'5 suf,s.) Lord Exeter's Merope, beat by a head Mr. Thorn ml is 



Example, and Lord Glasgow's f, by M. M° lo .f ;T**"g 8 uk e ^ 

 of 100 sovs each, h ft, for four-yr-olds. A.K «*«*••' G , a " t on 

 Bedford's Minotaur, 7 st, beat by a length ^^.^^ 

 ^Esop, 6 st 4 lbs. and Lord Exeter's Frnnlem, 6 ^ I1IDS - J™ 



Palace FUIy Stakes, of 100 sovs each for " J°«^nfheit nv^ 

 each. D.M. (6 subs.) Duke of Rutland's Crenolme, beat by a 



[1844. 



-*■ ■ ■■■ ■ * ' ■■ i i — 



neck Lord Stradbroke's Boarding School Miss ; Lord Albe- 

 marle's Robinia ; and Lord Exeter's Economy.— Sweepstakes, of 

 50 sovs each, for foals of 1841 ; colts 8 st 7 lbs, and fiilies 8st 3 ibs. 

 A.F. (9 subs.) Mr. Phillimore's Skeleton, allowed 3 lbs, beat 

 by 2 lengths Mr. Combe's Keeley ; Lord Orfora's c by Elis, out 

 of Miss Julia; Lord G. Bentinck's The Great Mogul; and Lord 

 W. Powlett's Falconer. Match.— 300/. T.Y.C.-Duke of Bed- 

 ford's Oakley, 8 st 7 Ibs, beat Lord G. Bentinck's Emma, 5 st 5J lbs, 

 by a length in a canter. Match.— First half of Ab. M. ; 150, h ft, 

 Mr. Greville's Molly Mogg, 3 yrs, 8 st /lbs; and Lord Glasgow's 

 f, by Bay Middleton, 6 st 7 lbs. A dead heat. 



Tuesday.— The 2000 Guinea Stakes of 100 sovs each, h ft, for 

 three-yr-old colts, 8st 71bs; fillies, 8 st 4 lbs. R.M. 25 subs. 

 Mr. J. Day's The Ugly Buck, by Venison (J. Day, jun.), beat by 

 a neck Lord G. Bentinck's The Devil-to-Pay ; Colonel Anson's 

 Joe Lovell; Mr. Wreford's c by Camel, out of Wadrasta; Lord 

 Exeter's Algernon, by Beiram ; Mr. Thornhill's Elemi; and Mr. 

 Maffam's Dr. Phillimore.— The Queen's Plate, of 100 guineas; for 

 mares, 4 yrs, 8 st 9 lbs; 5 yrs, 9 st 8 lbs; 6 yrs and aged, 10 st. 

 R.C. Lord Exeter's Wee Pet, by Sheet Anchor, 4 yrs, beat by 

 4 lengths Mr. Roger's Sister to Coranna; and Mr. Newton's 

 Jenny Jumps.— The Coffee- Room Stakes, of 10 sovs each; colts, 

 8 st 7 lbs; fillies, 8 st 4 lbs. The produce of mares that never 

 produced a winner. A.F. 7 subscribers. Duke of Richmond's 

 Red Deer, by Venison, beat by a length Mr. Watt's Voltri; Lord 

 Exeter's Mocha ; and Lord Exeter's Crosby.— Sweepstakes of 300 

 sovs each, 100 ft; for fouryr-old colts, 8 st 7lbs; and fillies, 

 8 st 2 lbs. B.C. 7 subs. Duke of Bedford's Minotaur by Taurus, 

 beat Lord Chesterfield's New Brighton, by four lengths.— Match, 

 8 st 7 lbs each. R.M. 200 h ft. Mr. Greville's Jamaica, beat 

 Lord Exeter's Economy, by half a length.— Match. T.Y.C. 100 

 sovs. Mr. Payne's Audrey, 7 st 13 lbs, beat Mr. Osbaldestons 



Escrick, 8 st 7 lbs, by a head. 



Wednesday.— 50/. for four-yr-olds, 7 st 8 lbs. ; five, 8st 11 lbs ; 

 six and aged, 9 st 3 lbs. B.C. Mr. Watson's Antidote, 4 yrs, 

 beat by three lengths Lord Exeter's Maria Diaz, 4 yrs.— Sweep- 

 stakes, of 50 sovs, each, b ft. T.M.M. (5 subs.) Duke of Rut- 

 land's Hyrcanian, 4 yrs, 6 st 7 lbs, beat by a length Col. Peel's 

 I-am-not-aware, ag-ed, 6st 12 lbs; and Lord Chesterfield's Bar- 

 barina, 4 yrs. 5 st 4 lbs. Match, T.Y.C, 200, h ft.- Duke of Bed- 

 ford's Oakley, 8st 7 lbs, beat Lord Exeter's Pergulana, 4 st 7 lbs, 



by a length. 



Thursday.— Sweepstakes of 10 sovs. each, for three-year-old 

 colts, 8 st 7 lb, and fillies 8 st 4 lb ; first half of Ab. M. Winner 

 to be sold for 80/., &c. (5 subs.) Lord Exeter's Mocha beat by 

 a length Mr. Greville's Molly Mogg, General Yates's Sister to 

 Pompey, Duke of Bedford's Commerce, and Mr. Osbaldeston s 

 c. by The Saddler.— The One Thousand Guineas Stakes, by subs, 

 of 100 sovs. each, h. ft., for three-year-old fillies, 8 st ; ibs each, 

 D.M. (26 subs.) Mr. Osbaldeston's f sister to Martiugale beat 

 by 2 lengths, Lord Exeter's Merope by Voltaire, Baron Roths- 

 child's Emerald, by Defence, and 6others.-TAe Eglinton Stakes, 

 of 100 sovs. each, h. ft., for colts 8st 7 lbs. and fillies, 8 st 2 lbs. 

 T.Y.C. (8 subs.) Lord Maidstone's Cockamaroo beat by ahead 

 Mr. Thornhill's Elemi and Duke of Bedford's Panther.— Ihe 

 Queen's Plate, of 100 guineas, for four-year-olds, 9 st 8 lbs ; five, 

 lost 7 lbs; six and aged, lost 12 lbs. R.C. Mr. Boyce s Cor- 

 ranna, 6 yrs, beat Lord Exeter's Czar, 4 yrs. O.KKS.-Match.— 

 Duke of Bedford's Espoir, Qst 7 lbs. beat Lord Glaspwsf.by 

 Bay Middleton. out of Impertinence, 7st; first halt of Ab. m., 

 200, h. ft., in a canter.—M«fr/i.-First half of Ab. M., 100, h. ft. 

 Duke of Bedford's Espoir, est 7 lbs, beat Mr. Osbaldestons 

 Escrick, 7st 7 lbs, by half a length.-JIfatcn.-A. F. 200, h. It., 

 8 st 7lbs each. Lord Albemarle's Winfarthing, by Liverpool, re- 

 ceived from Lord Exeter's Plush, by Economist. 



BIRTHS.-On the 4th inst., Mrs. M. Hoddf.r, of Hoddersfield, 

 of adauBhter-Sth inst., the lady of Capt. Battle y, of the 64th 

 Regiment, of a son-8thinst., at Margate, the wife of W'llm. 

 Brooke, Esq, of a son-15th inst., at Canterbury the jwife off 

 Lieutenant-Colonel Hankby, King's Dragoon Guards, o a still- 

 born son-17th inst.. at 17, Broad-street- buildings Mrs. G. 

 Dows B ,of ason-18th inst., at Grange-court, Chi«weU,Mw. 

 W. W.MAiTLAND,of a son-l9th inst., at 25, J-toMqoart. 

 the lady of W.Thackkr, Esq., of a son-lQthinst.. at ■Hammer- 

 smith, Mrs. J.P.Thom, of a *on-2lst mat., at Bath, the lac ly off 

 Sir C. Shaw, of a son, who survived but a short time-2lst in-t., 

 at Gloucester-road, Regent's Park, M^R-J. * ^ * •««- 

 2lstinst„ at Earlswooa-lodge, near Reigate, the 1 ad j of Major 

 £ P Lynch, K.L.S., of adaughter-2.st inst., at Upper Tooting, 

 Mrs. R. Johnson, of a son-2lst inst., Mrs. Curling Albion- 

 road, Stoke Newington, of a daughter- 2,d .nst at CUphain. 

 the wile of H. H. Deacon, Esq.. of a daughter-22d inst., at 

 Hampstead, the lady of D. S. Bockbtt, Esq., of a daughter. 



MARRIED.-On the 28th March, at Naples, Lieutenant-Col. 

 C. Hay, commanding the 19th Regiment, fourth son of the^te 

 Genera Sir James Hay, K.C.H., to Ellen Ash worth, second 

 daughter of the late Major General Sir Charles Ashworth 

 K S K.T.S.-17th inst., before the civil ^J*™'™? 

 afterwards at the Episcopal Church Rotterdam R. J. DonaK. 

 Esq., to Eliz.E. Wachter, eldest daughter of J. P. ^chter. 

 Esq.-23d inst., at Eccleston, near Chester, the Rev. W. Moxok 

 Mann,B.A., British Chaplain atCoblenz, on the **™£ £*** 

 iArpknter vouneest daughter of D. T. Carpenter, of Haw Re- 

 house ^ Snnb'ur?, Esq?, Capfain in the 6 1st Regiment of Foot, and 

 Soflora Stanley', of Alderley. and the Lord Bishop , of Nor- 

 wich-2Sd inst., the Rev. H. Thoufsox, B.A.. late of Ma d^ 

 hall, Oxford, to Julia E. Yka, youngest daughter of Sir \V iliiam 

 Walter Yea, Bart., of Pyrland-hall, in the county of Somerset 



DIED.-On the 31st of January, 1844 of cholera on boardher 



wi!i « No l Roupell-street, silversmith, aged 3y-Uth 

 nTs" Mr ?HAMMONn. P ofWalham.green i; •^^-^njU 

 a Hanover-buildings, Southampton, Mrs. M. Booth, aged /O- 

 i<thinS after a long and painful illness, C. Magnay, E*q., of 

 ionth IhieldV-Wth £st.. Mrs. A. White, of Parliament- street, 

 We"tmni terl.l5th in*:., at her residence 35, RusselLsquare, 

 BrS on Miss C. Norton, of Clayton Wickham. Sussex only 

 riuS iter of the late J. B. Norton, Esq., aged 78- 15th inst Ca- 

 koune M Hanr.y, wife of Lieutenant-Colonel Hankev , King's 

 Eragoon Guards, and daughter of A. W. Roberts, Esq.-l6th 

 inst at Leamington, Georgina M. Tryon, youngest daughter 

 of the late Lieutenant- Colonel Tryon— 16th inst., at Kingston- 

 hill Maria Smith, wife of G. S. Smith, E,q., aged 26-16th 

 inst at his mother's residence, Upper Clapton, Jas. C. Wood- 

 forob, eldest son cf the late J. Woodforde, Esq., formerly of his 

 Majesty's Exchequer— 17th inst., at 10, Grosvenor-street West, 

 Sir T. Turton, Bart., of Felcourt, Surrey, aged 80— 18th inst., at 

 Dankeith, in the county of Ayr, Lieutenant-Colonel Wh. K«l*o» 

 of Dankeith, late of the Hon. East India Company's Service— lQtb 

 inst., at his residence, Lansdowu-place East, Bath, the Rev. J. 

 Huntkr, A.M., youngest son of the late J. Hunter, Esq., of 

 Upper Holloway, Middlesex, aged 48— 2uth inst., in Park-street, 

 Grosvenor-square, Miss Anns C. Pack, only sister of the late- 

 Major-General Sir Denis Pack, K.C.B., aged 76-20th inst ^, ac 

 Wigan, Hkkbkrt G. Rbks, elder son of W. Rces. Esq., ngea« 

 years and 10 months-2lst inst., at Canterbury, Martha ■**. 

 kby, wife of W. H. O. Sankey, Esq., late of ^^^'^j^Si 

 atCheapside, after a short but severe illness, Mr . £. ■ ^^ 

 aged 42-2lst inst., J.Smith, Esq. °f the Orjnj^^ ^ q£ 

 mondsey, aged 63-23d inst., the Hon. » LG " ~ V j ce . Admiral 

 the East India Directors-21st, at ***«»"£> f Greeiiw ich 

 Sir Jahleel Brbnton, Deputy Lieut. -Governor 



Hospital. 



