Aug. 24,] 



THE NEWSPAPER. 





or aisrraction, such as "oh God! » kr hV,T • • «i"«w«"« 

 ingly close and remarkablVdfc^ 



rences which led to the death of Mrs Belinv Tn th ** £2"; 



Which his lordship broke off and obJr ve thS'tSi m » d8tof 



the expressions of distraction, ^y^cu^\^J!?\ 6tBvit€ 



After a few farther observations his lordship drew £ *i em . ent - 



He left it now to the gentlemen of the jury to form ^ ?T' 



roent upon the facts. They should be convinced &*& 



doubt either that the prisoner administered with his own hand! 



or placed the poison in the way of the deceased, before thev 



could convict. But if they bad the slightest doubt they should 



acquit him. There were several strange circumstances unar 



counted for. The falsehood before the death about the two 



that she had died of poison to be discovered at the inquest 

 Mr. Baron Gurney then proceeded to sum up the evidence. It 

 was now his duty to give such assistance as lay in his power to 

 the jury, in aiding them to form a conclusion upon the painful 

 subject before them. It was a most awful and most anxious 

 case. The crime with which the prisoner was charged was 

 one of the most atrocious and revolting he had ever heard. 

 It was a charge of murder, by means the most odious and de- 

 testable. The person alleged to have been murdered was that 

 one whom the prisoner was bound to love, cherish, and protect 

 above all else in the world. It appeared that she was young, 

 beautiful, and fascinating in manners and accomplishments, 

 that she had been his wife for nearly two years, and that they 

 had lived on terms of the greatest apparent happiness and affec- ' 

 tion so far as had been observed by all who had any oppor- 

 tunity of seeing or observing them, and the deceased was in a 

 Situation the m >st interesting, being about to give birth to a 

 child. A case of this kind undoubtedly called forthe most anxious 

 attention irom the jury. It differed from almost any he had ever 

 knowninthesecircumstances,that,generallyspeakingtherewas 

 a difficulty either in ascertaining wnether thedeatn was occa- 

 sioned by poison, or whether the accused was the person from 

 whose hands the poison came. In this case there was no doubt that 

 the unfortunate lady had come to her death by means of poison 

 —that that poison was prussic acid — a poison one of the most 

 fatal, certain, and speedy in its effects : and it was equally 

 certain that the poison came from the hands of the prisoner. 

 It was proved beyond doubt that he purchased it, and by his 

 own statement he had left it unprotected in the chamber of his 

 wife. It was certain she died from partaking of it; and the 

 question, therefore, that the jury had to consider was, whether 

 she— having so died from the effects of the poison— had received 

 it from the prisoner's hands, or it had been placed purposely in 

 her way by him in order that she might take it herself. The 

 secrets of the human heart were known to God alone, and 

 human tribunals could only judge of those secrets entertained 

 within by the conduct of the individual at the time. In this 

 case the jury had the conduct of the prisoner, his words, his 

 letters, and lus demeanour proved before them, and on these 

 they should decide whether on the whole of the case they 

 believed he either administered the poison, or placed it within 

 her reach in order that she might take it. If he did either of 

 those things he was guilty of murder. If they thought he bad 

 merely acted incautiously and negligently by leaving the poison 

 In the manner he had himself stated, he would not be guilty of 

 murder, and they should acquit him. It appeared that the 

 marriage between the prisoner and his wife had been contracted 

 with the full consent of the lady's mother, and had been a 

 happy one. His lordship went into a general review of the 

 circumstances connected with the journey to London, and then 

 proceeded to the evidence, on which he commented as he went 

 along. He drew attention to the several circumstances which 

 had been deposed to by the witnesses, both for the prosecution 

 and defence. Having gone through the entire of the oral evi- 

 dence, his lordship next called the attention of the jury to the 

 letters written by the prisoner, and these, he should observe, 

 were of a most extraordinary nature. The first, which was 

 Gated the 5th June, and directed to Mr. Bell, spoke of the 

 delicacy of Mrs. Belany, but added, that a little rest would 

 bring her round. Now, in all the subsequent proceedings at 

 htcpney, there was certainly no rest. They had heard of nothing 

 out a constant round of amusement. They were in constant 

 motion, with the exception of the one day, Wednesday. How- 

 ever, in the case of a lively young woman, such as the deceased 

 appeared to be, it was not much to be wondered at that she 

 Jiiouid try to see as much of London as possible. They would, 

 therefore, not lay much stress upon that. The next was of 

 greater importance. They had not this letter in evidence, it 

 having been destroyed, but they had evidence of its contents 

 Irom Mr. Dinning. He had received it on the 8th, so that by 



nnn!? n K Ce .°i! ,h ^ P° straastcr lt "'usthave been posted in London 

 on the 6th, the day alter the prisoner had written to Mr. Bell. 



hi. w^» rhat the P riM,,ier wr "te to Mr. Dinning that 



men l^h J C I y ,In weU ; , that . she was attend <* by two medical 

 2£H££ >? W . M fear of a mls carriage j and that such was her 



S able Tl a ' to r hCr ' that hG Sh0U,d * ive u " *» h ope» or 

 Obsefve h , £ ik ^ ° 8CC the W~»'y- The jury should 

 to th?, r2L/h .° ev,denc J e of Captain Clark, on that very 

 Mr* M.f-H ? ha J arran ^ ed w "h him to leave his wife with 



6tL TJ\^\7 h,]St ne * honld S0 to Lo0 ' That was °« the 

 Oth. The next letter was that of the 8th, and that was certainlv 



whether^ e w a thC "•»"» °, f *«• Belauy' They c^ld not teU 

 deatn it IZE To" 6 " after ° r before ' If written bef °re the 

 wrttten XV h Vl ff n,o ; e atron ^7 a ^inst the prisoner, if 

 7ome?*nhS'J? (Mr ' f Baron Gurney), should presently make 



and went o-« ^hS1°» UP ? D £ HiS Lordship read ^e letter, 

 £».* : ° J ' Thls Ietter lf not written after the death was at 



S? iJS? w a ritt P „ If Wr £ en T i e( ° re > » -rtainly^curred with 

 SSahJ k l en 0n the Thur8d ay to Dinning, about Mrs 



ftated y t» P AV Z e ^r a K ttend f d by tWO medical men, and it also 

 aUonhirt natur \ of the indisposition. But another consider- 



the °Sr?soner^ t S d f ,tSe,f With I**?* l ° the defence Set U P °? 

 deat h ?h»t " T K ef6nce Was that he did not expect his wife's 



horr-fieu at ZhI? tUTSi Wt ? thC r °° m he ^surprised and 



had arlen aT.d t * take ° ? lace » that he knew from what " 

 fhP wilt * and was anxious to conceal his negligence. Now 

 the letter was of a similar nature to the one written two davl 

 anc/ 6 ' rlt raentionpd ! f he two medical men as being in auend 



tevLltiL ia ZrrV eCOileCt ll L at Captain Clark s aid that 

 it was Jh?nLh > ¥ v Pr,SOn " had USed excl an>ations that 



wife had mifh H De fK ,gen ?t' Cntlrely throu * h ni8 fa «lt, his 

 J; e J ad ™ et her deatn ; _ There were some matters with 

 regard to the prisoner's statement of the occurrence to which 

 the jury should also attend. [His Lordship read the medical 

 evidence regarding the operation and effects of prussic acid ] 

 ine medical men concurred in one opinion that there was a 

 scream, caused by the action of the respiratory muscles, after 

 partaking of prussic acid, and that alter that all power and 

 volition ceased. Speech was impossible.. His Lordship again 

 read the statement of the prisoner. On the Monday the pri- 

 soner marie this declaration to Captain Clark; but before that 

 ne had written another letter to Mr. Bell. This letter was 

 posted after eight o'clock in the morning, and before five in the 

 evening. His Lordship read the letter. The prisoner thus 

 wrote on the Monday, not making any communication about 



after »hL° aUSe ° f deatn ' The rest of tne Ietters wcre all written 

 hJ Zl P nsonp r was taken into custody, and consequently after 



theTefor^ 1 ' 6 .^ the . nature ot the charge against him. They were 

 Ene of defTnn J 1 ? * f u " kno wlp dgeot the accusation.and the 

 ^t m^^^ h A WW n S Xnwy '' and ' consequently, were 



oose™T£*r£Z d To th H /'i S: Bar ° n Gurney ' Should here 

 Monday, tha^hev^erlwh CtterS Written 0n Sat « r day and 

 lected. Th" e was nnt o h ver J com P° sed and perfectly col- 



di8tractei^S%Tsclmw.ed 8,l R S ;5 , ?i ^ ° f the Writef heing 

 taken into r„< !T sed ; But those written after he was 



medical gentleman attending her, followed up by a similar 

 statement in the second letter, with the additional falsehood 

 that they said she had a complaint of the heart ; the assertion 

 In the room where his wife was dying that she was dying of 

 heart complaint, and that it was hereditary; that her mother 

 had died of it ; whilst it was proved that he had registered her 

 death as having resulted from bilious fever, and it had been 

 verified under his own handwriting. However, these matters 

 were all before the jury, and it was for them to form a judgment 

 upon them. And he would conclude by begging them to re- 

 member that it was better ten guilty men should escape than 

 that one innocent man should suffer. The jury retired at ten 

 minuses after one o'clock to consider their verdict. At a quarter 

 past five they returned into court, and announced the verdict to 

 be Not Guilty. 



Edward Brown, a young man respectably connected, surren- 

 dered on the charge of obtaining by false pretences, on the 

 17th April last, the sum of 350/. from Richard Edward Arden. 

 Mr. Clarkson stated the case, as it appeared by the evi- 

 dence of the prosecutor. Mr. Richard Edward Arden deposed 

 that he was a solicitor, residing in Gray's- inn square. The 

 prisoner was introduced to him on the 13th March last by a person 

 named Morgan. Witness had pecuniary transactions with him. 

 On the 17th April, the prisoner called upon him and produced a 

 hill for 975/. 10a-., drawn by Pott, Baxter, and Brown, on Thomas 

 Roberts, of Liverpool, and accepted by Roberts, payable at Glynn 

 and Company's, at three months after date, which he requested 

 witness to discount. Witness said he was not in the habit of 

 discounting bills, and disliked them. He also said he knew 

 nothing of the parties, and asked the prisoner several questions, 

 to which he replied that Roberts was a wool-broker at Liverpool, 

 very respectably connected, and that he had dealings with the 

 house of Pott, Baxter, and Co. To further queries, he said that 

 the bill was a good one, taken in the course of business for a 

 bond fide consideration, and it would be surely paid when it was 

 due. He also said he had a iarge sum in the house of Pott, Baxter, 

 and Brown, in which he was a partner, adding that his own con- 

 nexions and his wife's were highly respectable, and he himself 

 possessed a good property, and was a freeholder. He said the 

 house of which he was a partner was extensively connected, and 

 that they frequently required advances. Witness asked him was 

 it worth his while to obtain money in such a manner ? and the 

 prisoner replied that he got 30 per cent, for sending goods to Val- 

 paraiso, and it was therefore an object to obtain money in the way 

 required. Witness subsequently gave him a cheque for 350/. on 

 the faith of his representations, and the bill for 975/. 10s. was 

 handed to him (witness). He subsequently handed the prisoner 

 a second sum of 350/. When the bill became due it was dis- 

 honoured, and he found that all the representations made by the 

 prisoner were false, and his name appeared in the Gazette as a 

 bankrupt. On cross-examination by the Solicitor General, the 

 prosecutor admitted that he had not been bound over in recog- 

 nizances to prosecute, previously to going before the grand jury. 

 The Solicitor-General submitted to his lordship that the indict- 

 ment was bad. The offence was laid as committed in London, 

 whereas it should have been Middlesex, according to the evidence. 

 And, by the act of Parliament, although previous recognizances 

 need not be entered into in London, they should be in Middlesex, 

 before going to the grand jury. Mr. Clarkson admitted the error. 

 After a long discussion, the jury, under the direction of the Re- 

 corder, returned a verdict of Not Guilty. 



Summer Assizes.— Oxford Circuit, Gloucester.— New- 

 ton v. Holford and others.— This was an action of tresoass, 

 brought by Mr. Augustus Newton, barrister-at law, against the 

 late High-Sheriff of this county, and four other defendants, officers 

 and assistants of the sheriff, for breaking and entering the house 

 of the plaintiff injuring the locks of the doors, and beating the 

 sons ot plaintiff. 1 he defendants paid 2/. into court, and pleaded 

 that plaintiff had not sustained any further damage. The plain- 

 tiff •appeared .in person to conduct his own case; Mr. Serjeant 

 laltourd and Mr. Greaves represented the defendants. The action 

 arose out of a proceeding which has already formed the ground- 



T°l\?\u° tna ! 8 \ one . of which (a civil action) took place at the 

 last Middlesex sittings in the Court of Common Pleas at Westmin- 

 ster, and the other (an indictment for perjury) at the last Worces- 

 Jlf 1 ^ II Wl1 ' be necessary, therefore, in order to make a 



fh?n h/^Tf^T 56 ' ntelli ei°le. to go a little farther back 



than the 5th July, 1843, when the trespass now in question was 



committed. The plaintiff having become indebted to a wine mer! 



chant in the amount of 12/, was served with a copy of a writ, and 



consented to a judge's order to enter up judgment,which was ac 



cordingly entered up and a writ of ca.sa. was issued thereon. An 



officer ol the sheriff of the city of Gloucester arrested the plaintiff 



o^ V ^rL°/- that , Writ While he was ^tending the Midsummer 



STS^SS^SSfffi at , G i? ucester ' J n ^professional capa- 



SerVean T \J™ y ^ ^ P rotection of the Court. Mr. 



nrnirn n ?£ Z' ^\ P«sided, declined to make any positive 



of whi.hth S ^ G % bUt su ^ested an arrangement, by the terms 



avoca dons ^SS tf WM « ** 3t libert yto pursue his professional 



h s San imSISV- C cont ; nuance of th e sessions, the plaintiff on 



a es P t A £w d,v m ?, ™ t0 take ar, y advantage of the first 



™Hotc£^™ 7 ?VK¥ 1 *? etaes * ion * h * d included, the 

 writ of ca. sa was placed in the hands of George Wilson a snecial 



y Ho"S a %ur°n r P r he W* ' ^ he P-cefdelaccom P S 

 Dy Ho.tnam, Turner, and Vines, the other defendants on the 



record, to the residence of plaintiff at St. Paul's CoUagf Che ltln- 



fothe d^aud SdW the H G ab ° Ut a qUarter to^ve C & 

 the . ou?s?de wSS?n f ,t w g f>, den g , ate COU,d not be °P e » ed from 



son Wil ham PhiZ 5 ? the pal,ng " The Pontiff's younger 

 son, William Philip Newton, came up at the moment and a t 



ESHSrrS*^ Cass 



and T presented 2 uistnl tht° n ; W ?° £» forewa ™ed, was armed, 

 if it was no titan ' ^fJ^'" 1 ^ to Mow out the dog's brains 

 awVas Ct as h P SET - ^ lad V fri - htened out of hi! wits, ran 

 in a stab f Th, lr \ ' *?&??" ° f the servants shut up the dog 

 and opened to^Alf™ 9" ^ "ojnlmo tlfe garden! 

 withhimtothPftnnfS h ^ m \ lurner » and Vines, who went 



which wa%efused The' h» ? r c " d !r° Ured t0 obt ain admittance, 

 under the shade if iom? ^ then retired for a short tim e 



the back doof w£ ich 'aceortL*^ fj^. 1 ^ a ° entraDCe * 

 open by the defendant w°i s «,l° tne P Ia mtiff's case, was burst 



the plaintiff, and "Sok him^fV ™ 6 b J iliffs then entered » arrested 

 plaintiffs eldest ^son, Fmncis Roh.n v X t0 , Gloucester ^°1. The 

 a little by the defendants in «?h ^.^^on. w as pushed about 

 plaintiff brought twoictioS. fo S l hr0Ugh the passage ' and tne 

 which the ca°use of aetion aHp-d occi ; rred > one of which, in 

 tried in the Common Pleas and fh^ T ?i e ira P ris °nment, was 

 to obtain 50/. as damage "' Thl ^ t V laint,ff was fortunate enough 

 tried to-day, in whichthP i her actlon was that whicn was 



was, that h'is "oo^ had t e en g S n en an°d f ^ ^^'Z TZS™ 111 

 saulted. bv which hp InJ /iJ . E "=' and hls two son s had beenas- 



Talfourd iddVessed tie 8 u?y e M°drf ^i "^^ **'****«* 

 the 40*. which had been paW into couS t^T*' con 1 tendin S that 

 tion for the injury which the nlainHff V f an . amp i e compensa- 



beingofthe sime^pinion,tnllTv? r dt%oT^ 



at Milton-next-Gravesend, Mrs a if *~ " ou K" i er-i2th ioi 

 ter-uth inst., at the vica age, ' Somennn ^^Ji ° f a ***& 

 W. R. NKWBOLT,ofa son?* ' Somerton . the lady of the ££. 



MARRIAGES.— Recently, in the ChanPi «r r L 

 lace, by his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbarl I £ mbe 2 l P *- 

 Hamilton, M.P., brotherto the Marquess of AhL UttD CtAu n 

 E.E Probv, second daughter of RearTd^raUhe Tu^° ?* 

 Proby, and niece of the Earl of ;Carysfort~ oth iL D l G * L - 

 den, Kent, T. B. May, Esq., of the Inner Telle ba'rrf', ShoU 

 law to Nancy E. A.Banks, eldest daaghtS "Sf the Zt *!'*' 

 Banks, Esq., of Hailing, Kent, and gr^ddauJhtir r lt Joni1 

 SirE. Banks-loth insL, at Miltor L^GravSend m^ 5 ^ 

 Aovew, Colonial Secretary, Dominica to Hn ?! , ' D Major J - 

 third daughter of H. Brandon, Esq.^^ 



at St. James's Church, Dover, D. Davib i Ek i of 7i- fe- 

 grave-street, Eaton-square, to Mary ci«J q 'iiSLJ^ er BeU 



of J. Capel, Esq., of Fitzro^square? ' elde8t °* n &hter 



DEATHS.-On the 10th inst., Julia Li DD bll T«rm« „ 

 daughter of the late Mr. J. Twigg_i S *£« Tw a i °°? 8econd 

 house, Trafalgar-lodge, Chelsea, W T Webb V.« hl8 J 80Q '« 



^H ftS ll » Mi reSidenCe « CUfton ^ Ca'mbeVefrN^ 

 road, Mr. J. Nanson, upwards of 30 vears in t\Z I ? W ' 



Messrs. Barclay, Tntton, and Co., ageS so- ilth i n " ^° f 

 Chester, Lieut. A. R. Shakbsfkar, of the 4Qth RpSim' f m ' 

 inst., at Compton Pauncefoot, Somerset L G H^m ent ~i 2ttt 

 -12th inst., at the house of her father, G K pivnn J' E$q ; 

 Hampstead, Emma Wvche, aged 25 ; also ' on the ^^ *"*" ° f 

 the residence of his father/ G f ove-hUl, 8 cimberwe 11 ti? r' at 

 J. P. T. Wyche, M.A., husband of the abov ? o7c'r anfi .M ^ 

 the county of Bedford, aged 38. He wasTinL Cr ?n field, in 

 attending divine worship in the mornint il T'i?™' 

 Church, Camberwell-isth inst., iTdy A P E , n f iman uel 

 Scott, eldest daughter of the late Charles' Willi ^ n^ 

 of Buccleuch and Queensberry-uth inst 2 KhT' UkC 

 Exeter, where he had gone for the benefit of hi ^hea th C,?!?' 

 Edwin Gwilt, third surviving son of G. Gwut Si S*< *!' 

 wark, aged 33-l5th inst., S. L. Kk.vt Esq of riS t'wL^f " 

 formerly of Carpenters' Hall, London , ^;•5Sa 1 S^ISS!? , 

 at her residence, Richmond-green, Miss E Wa.mksiky- Hh 

 inst., at the Manor-house, East Ham Essex K^.flr ? 

 Fry, second daughter of VV. S. Fry, Esq, aged 6^££?l£ 

 inst., of a disease of the heart, at his hoVse?^iite Hart sT e ? 

 Kennington, T, Sillitoe, Esq., late of the Freight Office Eatt 

 India House, aged 50-l6thinst., at his residence Hn^ni'rn^ 

 Birmingham, J. Kettle. Esq.,' aged 7I-I0S1 inst a " C' 

 broke-place, Notting-hill, the Rev. T. C. Browve" vicar of 

 liaise .Somersetshire, aged 31-i6th inst., T? ™ T /vDai.. 

 Esq., of the Middle Temple, barrister, aged 49 -16th inst Eli? 

 Todd, relict of the late R. Todd, Esq , of 20, Alpha road Re' 

 gent's Park-lbth inst., at Upminster, Maria Bo vck third 

 daughter of Mr. T.Boyce-i 7 th inst., G Sharp Esq of Wal 

 thamstow,and31,Wmchester-streeti-] 7 thins^ *Mr S Smith 



bur C v t °L t [f late , Mr % W , Sra n ith ' ° f Soaffan?^SW^BKS: 

 Kossmore ' ' Dear Windsor » the Baroness 



WSEED TRADE, 

 ANTED, a SHOPMAN who well understands the 

 business in all branches. A liberal Salary will be given to 

 a competent person.— Apply to J. G. Waite, 1 & 4, Eyre-street- 

 hill, Hatton Garden. 



inst., at 54 MiUbonk-street, W «mb »ter?M'rs J C T«" 

 BK.Do«.ofa8on-10th inst., at Park.street, Wnd,'o -the"", 

 of Major ANDBBsow.of a dauenter— inrh i„.. . ?. ' -J 



theladyof A.R. B«.iow, E^q. f f Tio^^S™^ 

 il\~UtnVJt Y rX h ' the i aUy ° f W - fc i Esq- oV a'da^h. 



ter-nthin s t.,ather residence, 18, Arbour-terrace, Commer- 



WANTED, a GARDENER, who thoroughly under- 



f f stands the management of plants, viz. :— Flower- Garden, 

 Greenhouse, Conservatory, Hothouse, and Orchidaceous Plants, 

 the growth of Melons, early Cucumbers, and Vines. The Houses 

 are all on a small scale, but the greatest neatness and order 

 are required throughout. Besides the Gardener now wanted, 

 there is a regular Kitchen-Gardener kept, also a young Man 

 under the principal Gardener.* Everything relating to the 

 Flower department must be kept in the very best order. His 

 travelling expenses will be paid, but if he does not suit he 

 must defray them back himself. His character must bear the 

 strictest inquiry from the family he last served. A Cottage is 

 found.— Direct to W". H., Lymington, Hants, for a week ; after 

 that to Gunfield Cottage, Daitmouth. 



WANT PLACE S.— All Letters to be post-paid. 



AS HEAD GARDENER, a steady Married Man, 

 without incumbrance, who understands his business in 

 all its different departments, forcing, and the ma a^ement of 

 land, &c. j can have a good character from the ^ntleman he 

 has just left. Direct to A. P., No. 9, Spring Gardeus, Clapham, 



Surrey. — — 



S GARDENER.— A respectable Married Man, aged 



37, who perfectly understands his business, including the 

 management of Pines, Vines, Peach-house, Green-house, 

 Flower and Kitchen- Gardens, and all other Forcing depart- 

 ments. The only reason for leaving his last place is on 

 account of his late master's decease. Direct to A. W. C, Mrs. 

 Plym, Brette n Terra* */, Ki ng's Road, Chersea. ■ 



AS GARDENE Lady & Gentlemen are anxious 

 to obtain a Situa ; a highly respectable married man, 

 without incumbrance, *uo lived many years 111 their f arr. ily- 

 ae-e about 40. He can be highly recommended as industrious 

 and trustworthy j ha* a perfect knowledge of his business in 

 all its branches; could manage 30 or 40 acres of Grass land. 

 Wae-es not so much an object as a comfortable family, with 

 aLodle to .live in.-Direct to M. W., Post Office, Clifton Street, 

 Fins b ury Square. — . _ 



§~GARDENE R.— Mr. J. Robertson, Gardener 



to Mrs. Lawrence, Ealing Park, Ealing, Middlesex, can 

 confidently recommend a-young Man as Gardener to any Noble- 

 man or Gentleman in want of a competent and tr us worthy 

 servant. He has likewise lived as foreman m two Noblemen s 

 gardens, by whose gardeners he can also be recommended.- 

 Direct as above. . nnp1 , TPP 



rGROORTalriGARDKNER, or GARDNER 



and COWMAN.-A married Man, aged 25- His W ife can 



A 



act as^aiwnaVd." No objection to any part of the country .- 

 ^jfgT^o ^-office. Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire. 



S GAMEKEEPER.— A married Man, aged 40, 



who perfectly understands the Raising and Preserving of 

 Game • has had great practice in rearing Pheasants by hand, 

 and possesses e/ery information -f^Jbr^eePj 

 Has no objection to the management of Land, if reqnirtd. He 

 can have the most satisfactory character ^from the ™We«an he 

 last left.-Direct to A. B., Post-office, Totton, near the New 

 Forest, Hants. , — 



A - ~S BAILIFF and GARDENER, or either.— An 

 active, single Man, who has had extensive practice in the 

 above capacities, in the Channel Islands, Great Britain, ana 

 fre.and.Sn the most improved principles. Can prcjocetf 

 unexceptionable character from the gentleman he has served 

 for the last 10 years, as to integrity and ability.-Direct to D. F., 

 8, Dorchester- place, Blandford square, London. . 



S FLOWER-GARDENER, or Gardener in general. 



x-a. -A Married Man, aged 28, with one child w ho perfectry 

 understands his profession, having been brought ; „ , ,n ^venu 

 private establishments, and can have nine years n n ^ e Pj IO " t 

 able character from his present employers.-Direct to u. n ., * 

 Chandler and Son's, Nurserymen, Vauxhali. 





A 



