1892.] THE NAGA AND KAREN HILLS AND PERAK. 651 



SUASTUS ADITUS. 



S. aditus, Moore, J. A. S. B. 1884, p. 49. 



A single specimen from the Karen Hills agrees with Sikkim 

 examples. 



Telicota augias. 



? Pap. augias, Linn. Syst. Nat. i. 2, p. 794 (1767). 



Telicota augias, Wood-Mason & de Nice'ville, J. A. S. B. vol. Iv. 

 pt. ii. p. 384, no. 224, t. xvii. fig. 1 S (1886). 



? T. bambusce, Moore, P. Z. S. 1878, p. 691, t. xlv. 11, 12. 



Specimens from the Naga Hills and Perak, which I am still unable 

 to compare with Javan specimens, from which Moore separated 

 T. bambusce. "Whether the typical T. augias is distinct from what is 

 so called in India I therefore cannot say ; but I am unable to separate 

 two species among my large series by the characters given by Moore 

 or by Wood-Mason and de Niceville '. 



Telicota stva. 



Pamphila siva, Moore, P. Z. S. 1878, p. 692. 



Common in the Karen Hills and also sent from Bernardmyo. 

 The female differs from the male in being somewhat darker and has 

 no sexual brand, which is conspicuous in the male, and by the form 

 of which I distinguish this species from T. brahma, Moore, found 

 in the N.W. Himalayas. In two of the males from Bernardmyo 

 the spots on the hind wing are somewhat differently placed and the 

 general colour darker. These may be of a distinct species, but the 

 material is insufficient to enable me to describe it. 



Padraona dara. 



Hesperia dara, Koll. Hiigel's Kaschm. iv. p. 455 (1848). 

 Pamphila mcesa, Moore, P. Z. S. 1865, p. 509, t. xxv. 9. 

 Sent from the Naga and Karen Hills, but does not seem to be 

 abundant. 



Padraona m^soides. 



Pamphila mcesoides, Butl. Trans. Linn. Soc, 2nd ser. Zool. i. 

 1879, p. 554. 



Padraona masoides, Doh. J. A. S. B. 1886, p. 139. 



? P. sunias, Feld. Sitz. Ak. Wiss. Wien, raath.-nat. CI. xl. p. 462 

 (1862). 



Naga Hills, Burmah, and Perak. 



I have a large series of specimens from different parts of India, 

 as well as from the Andamans, Nias, Hongkong, Java, Borneo, and 

 the Philippines, which seem to belong to one species, though there 

 is considerable variation amongst them ; and it is possible that there 

 may be anatomical differences which I have not detected. 



' Mr. de Niceville, who has numerous examples from Java, since assures me 

 that they are distinct and that he has specimens of both species from Central 

 India, 



