^6 Orang'-^Ou'^ang fiw Homo Syhejlrts ; Or^ 



drmm oceupet. Vefalna ( 57 ) therefore is in the right, where he faith, 

 Slf<s en'rm Diffedlonnm Profcjfores ds-Jecoris fortna'^ acpemdkfenfibrjs (qms 

 ?Jioiig Gr£ci vacant} comment an'mr--, i Canum potius ^ & jimiarum fcBio- 

 n'tbm^ cjitam homimtm didzceriint. Humannm enim Jecur in fibras^ Porc/ni, 

 acfnnlt)) adhuc minus Can'mijecorhntodo^ non difcinditur. And that he 

 hints here at Galen,' is plain, from what he exprefles in his Epiftle ad 

 JcacMi/s-'Roelants, (j^Zy where he farther enlarges upon it. And Galen 

 (5 9) himfelf tells us, that Herophilus was of this Opinion. So Theophiluf 

 P.moj^,aUrii0r(6d) {d!n\\\; that the Lzz»er is divided into four Lobes -^ and- 

 gives us there a diftinftName for each. Arijlotk, (61) 'tis certain, was 

 much more in the right, where he faith, i^^-^J^vXov y '^ -n rs dv^^oena 

 sira^,, a, Oytiaioy vaf ySosia. Rotundum Jecur hontink eji, ac fmile bnbulo. For 

 the. Liver of a Bullock, like a Man's is entire 5 and not divided into 

 -Lobes. However Francifcm FttUm (62) in his Apology, having named 

 feverai Phyficiansand Chirurgians, that were with him at the opening,. 

 o£:Chark.i the Ninth, Duke oi Savoy, faith, hi omnes per Jovem mihipof- 

 Jil^nt cjje Tejles, qnod obfervatitmeU Epar habnijje qnatuor pinnuloi. Jaca- 

 bus.Sy.hius (69) likewife juftifies G<?/e«, zgzm'ii Vef alt us --^ and tells us, 

 ^tin €^ Hippocrates Lobos Epatis htimani qninque connnmerat libro [no de 

 ojjlbm^ Rnfm antem quatHor velqiiinque. %^t Renati^ Henerus (64) hatb 

 anfwered Sylvim as to this matter ^ and there needS' no farther difpute a^. 

 bout it, if one will but believe his own Eyes, he may fully fatisfie him- 

 felf, that, in an Httmane Liver there are none of thofe Lobes, but that 

 'tis one entire Body ; as it was alio in our Pygmie. But in Apes and 

 Monkeys the Liver is divided into Lobes. . 



The great ufe of the Liver is for to make a feparation of the Gall^ 

 from the Mafs of Blood. We will therefore here examine the Biliary 

 VeJJels 5 nor do I find them any thing different from thofe in a Man 5 

 only the Bladder of Gall here in our Pygmie feemed longer, being four 

 Inches in length. It's adhxilon to the Liver was not fo much as it is in 

 a: Man ; for ^t th^ fimduf or end, it juts beyond the Liver about half an 

 Inch. For about three quarters of an Inch, it is more clofely joyned to ' 

 the Liver -^ afterwards it is faftened to it only by a Membrane, as is alfo 

 the DtiilufCyfiicx^. So that the Feficafellea when inflated with wind, 

 feemed more to reprefent an Intefline by it's anfiaBm and length , than' 

 theufualftiape of the Bladder of Gall -^ -which commonly is more belly- 

 ing out. 



The Parijians obferved in their Monkey s,th'^t thtBladder vpasfajlened to the 

 firjlofthe two. Lobes which were on the right frde.That it was an Inch long,and' 



(57) Vefalij c/e fahjca corporis hinnani, lib. 5. cap. 7. p.m.^ip. (58) Andryefali] Ep!nola,S(.c.p.tn,8i,. 

 (i^j Galen. deAnar.AdminijTrtit.lih.S.ci-p.S,. (60) Theophilu^ de Corporis humanifabrka, lib. 2. cap. 2. 

 (61) Arifl. NiJ}. Animttl. lib. 1. cap. i7>-p. m. 595. (62) Franc. Putei Apologia pro Galetio in Anatomkk' 

 contra Andr.yefalium, \ih. $.p. m. 153. I'd?) t^afanicujufdam CalumniarKmin Hipp. Galenique rem A- 

 yiat. depulfio. per Jac. Sytvium. vid. Depulf. 26. p. m. 150. (1J4) Renat. Hcnerui adverfiu Jacobl Syhij 

 jyepulfionum AnaP. Calummas pro Andteafefiilie Apoloi!g,^,tn,}^, 



