The Anatomy of a T Y G M I B, 87 



Man^ agreeable to the Capacity of its Thorax : The reft of the Mitfcks 

 of the Thorax appear on it's Back-part, which we (hall niention here- 

 after. 



Before I pafs to the Mufcles on the Back- part of onr Pygmk , I (hali 

 take notice of a Pair of Mufcles, that do not appear in Humane Bodies ; 

 which from their life may be call'd Elevatores Clavicular w^i^ (f^'g- 3- 12.) 

 Either of them arifes Fle(hy from the Tranfverfe Procejfes of the fecond 

 and third Fer^e^r^ of theiVec^j and defcends obliquely outwards to it's 

 broad Infcrtion at the upper part of the Clavicula 5 when it Afts, it draws 

 up the Clavicle, affifting the Elevator ScapnU^ and upper part of the 

 Cnculark^ in raifing the whole Shoulder. The fituation of this Mufcle, 

 is not unlike the upper part of that reprefented by Fefalim in his fixtli 

 Table of th^Mnfcks O. T. P.-Q. which he fays is found in D%s and 

 Apes^ and defcribed by Galen in Humane Bodies , in whom 'it h Hot ex- 

 iftent. Drelineourt czlh'xt Levator Omoplat<£ , (adding) ab Afophyfbrfs 

 tranpuerfis cervicalihus in Acromion d^ extremum clavicula extenditttr. 



The Mufcles imploy'd in the Motion of the Scapula , are the Cucrdark. 

 (Fig.4. I.I.I.) Khomhoides Qc\^.&f.6?) Levator ScapuU (ib.^.) Thefe alfo 

 agreed with the Humane : The like being taken notice of by Drelincourt 

 of the Cucularif, in the Female Ape. The reft of the Mufcles of the Tho- 

 rax, are the Serratm fupertor pofticus, ( Fig. 4. 7. ) the Serratm inferior 

 poflic:^ (Fig. 4. 32. 32.) Thefe dilfer'd not from thofe in Men. The 

 Sacrolumbalk (Fig, 4. 29.) was not fo thick as in Men, but was every way 

 llenderer. 



The M;//2'/w imploy'd in the Motion o^x}ciZ Head of the Pygmie, dif- 

 fered very little from thofe in Man-^ as tliQ Splenim -, (Fig. 4. 2.) Com- 

 plexus, (Fig. 4. 4») Re&us major, Re^us minor , ObJiqiws Superior, and 

 Obliquus Inferior, neither was this Inferior Oblique Mufcle larger than ia 

 Man i, as Vefulim, Lib. II. Cap. XXVIII. aiTures us,it is in Apes and Dogs. 

 The Mafloideus (Fig. 3. 8. 8.) was chiefly inferred to the Occipital-bone, 

 as the Parifians obferve it in Monkeys, The RcSlus iniermis major, not 

 commonly defcribed by Authors in Humane Bodies , tho' it is vety plain 

 and conftant in all thofe, I have hitherto lookt for ir, was alfo in the 

 Pygmie. The P<e^Uf internum minor, or Mufculm Anmicjts , fometimes 

 obferved by me in Humane Bodies, was alfo in this Animal 5 and fo was 

 the Rec$ us Later alk defcribed by Falloppius in Men.- 'Nor was any of 

 thofe M?i/2'/ej- 1 have difcovered in Humane Bodies, wanting in this J»z-- 

 mal, but the InterJ^inales CollL 



The Longi Colli of thxs Animal, appear 'd to be longer and larger than 

 thofe of Humane Bodies. The Spinalk Colli and Tranfverfalk Colli were 

 like thofe in Humane Bodies. The Interjj>inales Colli, which I have elfe- 

 v;here defcribed in Men, did not appear in this AnimaL The Longijji- 



' mu^.- 



