1897.] BUTTEKFLIES COLLECTED ITS' NATAL. 839 



9. PsEUDONYMPHA SABACUS, Trimen. 



Karkloof, 4200 feet, 8th, 12th, and 15th February, 1897. 



10. Neoc^nyea neita, Wallengren. 



Frere, 3800 feet, 2nd, 4th, 5th, and 10th December, 189G. 



As Mr. Triraen has included this species in the genus Pseudo- 

 nymplia, I am not surprised that he failed to note the structural 

 characters which I indicated as distinguishing the genus Neoccenyra : 

 the species of the two genera can be separated at the first glance 

 by the different structure of their antennae ; but, apart from 

 structural differences, the style of marking in Neoccenyni is far 

 more suggestive of Erebia and Palceonympha than that of 

 Pseuclonympha. 



11. Mbneris indosa, Trimen. 



Karkloof, 4200 feet, loth, 17th, and 20th February, 1897. 



The neuration and palpi of this species and of M. dendrophilus 

 correspond with those of Aleneris ; the antennae are perhaps 

 comparatively shorter, and certainly more slender and less strongly 

 clubbed ; but the form of wing and character of marking are not 

 very dissimilar. I therefore follow Mr. Heron in placing them 

 in Meneris. 



12. Chaeaxes JAHLrsA, Trimen. 



Tugela Kiver, near Weenen, 2500 feet ; ? 28th October, 

 S 10th November, 1896. 



13. Pyeameis caedui, Linn. 



Estcourt, 4000 feet, 25th August, 20th September, and loth 

 October, 1896. 



14. HYPAJiTAETiA scH(ENEiA, Trimeu. 

 Karkloof, 4200 feet, May 1896. 



15. JuNONiA CLOAis'THA, Cramer. 



Estcourt, 4000 feet, 24th and 27th August, 1896. 

 J. can see no reason for adopting Karsch's Catacroptera, which 

 to my mind was based upon trivial characters. 



16. JuNOJJiA AECHEsiA, Cramer. 



" Dry form," Malvern, 800 feet, 11th August, 1896. 



16 a. JuNONiA PELASGis, Godart. 



" Wet form," Tugela Eiver, near Weenen, 2500 feet, 23rd Octo- 

 ber and 13th November, 1896. 



Mr. Marshall writes: — "I have again had an opportunity of 

 observing the seasonal relationship existing between J. archesia and 

 J. pelasgis, and J. octavia-natcdensis and J. sesamus, which quite 

 supports the opinion expressed by me in the Trans. Ent. Soc. for 

 September. IJnfortunately, I have been unsuccessful in obtaining 



