1896.] BUTTERFLIES OF THE FAMILY HESPERIIDA. 15 
38. C. (?) HoMEYERI, Ploetz. 
Lagiades homeyeri, Ploetz, 8. E. Z. vol. xli. p. 807 (1880). 
Hab. Pundo Ndongo. 
I do not know this species, but as it is said by the author to be 
very near C. galenus, Fabr., I locate it here provisionally. 
39. C. MoKEEZI, Waller. 
Pterygospidea mokeezi, Waller. K. Sv. Vet.-Acad. Handl. 1857 ; 
Lep. Rhop. Caffr. p. 54. 
Hesperia amaponda, Trim. Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. (3) vol. i. 
p- 405. 
Nisoniades mokeezi, Trim. Rhop. Afr. Aust. vol. ii. p. 316, pl. vi. 
fig. 5. 
Pteryyospidea mokeexr, Trim. Butt. 8. Afr. vol. ili. p. 358. 
Celenorrhinus mokeezi, Watson, P. ZS. 1893, p. 50. 
Hab. Extra-tropical 8. Africa. 
40, C. (?) tuEHDERI, Ploetz. 
Plastingia luehdert, Ploetz, 3. H. Z. vol. xl. p. 357 (1879), 
vol. xlv. p. 147 (1884). 
Hab. Aburi (Ploetz). 
The figure of this species drawn by Ploetz appears to be a crude 
representation of a species of Celenorrhinus, hut the statement of 
Ploetz, that there is a sexual mark or brand upon the primaries, 
does not agree with this view. I am at a loas, without having the 
insect before me, to say where it should be located. Mons. 
Mabille’s note upon the drawing of Ploetz, contained in one of 
his manuscript comments upon the Ploetzian figures, strikes me as 
very appropriate, “ mihi non verisimile videtur.” 
TRicHospMeErA ', Holl. 
41. T. suBotivescrens, Holl. (Plate V. fig. 15.) 
T. subolivescens, Holl. Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Oct. 1892, p. 294; 
Wats. P. Z.S. 1893, p. 53. 
Hab. Matabeleland. 
42, T. reTrastiema, Mab. 
Ceratrichia tetrastigma, Mab. C. R. Soc. Ent. Belg. 1891, 
p: lxv; Novit. Lepidopt. p. 119, pl. xvi. fig. 8. 
Hab. Interior of Cameroons (Staudinger). 
Mons. Mabille refers this species with some doubt to the genus 
Ceratrichia. With his type before me, I am able to assert that the 
species is positively congeneric with the type of the genus 
Trichosemia. It may even prove to be true that the two species 
are the same, in which case Mons. Mabille’s name will have 
priority. There is, however, considerable difference in the colour 
1 By a typographical error, printed originally as “‘ Tricosemeta.” 
