THE GARDENERS 5 CHRONICLE. 



. <L¥F RASPBERRY, Tobolsk 



" rF ..T-RATS >E,nDLI-NG <"-l : - 

 .,- MILLER 1ims' i: 



%.■£ 





rfie GarBmflS* ffif)nmicle. 



IY, FEBRUARY 13, 1847. 



lowledge; that he nevei 

 lned any lime for Messrs. Hubbakd and Co.; and 

 tint he does not Tecommend magnesian limestone 

 tit cure ior the Potato disease. In the year 1844, 

 • - throe ye irs ap he, in civility to these par- 

 ties, of whom he has no knowledge whatever, pro- 

 Bide for them, for which he paid one guinea, 

 was repaid by Messrs. H. and Co. ; but tbej 

 that it was for the analyst 

 Dr. L employed, and that he had no part 



- ' '- \ ^'T, :':, ■,.:.. 



. . i 

 Stand on RJch- 



^tiln^aut^r^^ 

 *chtW . the g ° lden tints wonderful^ 



<Wm on »h!Vi 1S " that bestows the greal 

 **» cat - n h t PJ-Pect?~it is the Thames 

 d* A. ym lts Wln dmg course— now lost tt 



Wom^t! ;1" ^ re ' s ow " lin , e 0f beauty 



B*t£I 



rh differing in the. 

 irchyard of HarrJw- 





'« worse throughout that, 

 f.^tiful indeed. hat ' 



Xov !" entof beauty in 



ery Thames, 

 ?, the scenery 



then, perfect 



• straight river, or a perfectly 



,or sea, any more than there 



^ShJ^ 5** c? ThrLaPE^fls 



fcwith The IreatS" i-^ 00 th ^Iine\he 



3S? t, ° n of T As S TE ed a te9t . del, ^ a »d by careful 



bS^wfulIv Lt f Cla i l y introduced, may be 

 i* of »ts esfe lf only by the apparent 



we nave spoken ot ttoe Uurve as r> 



if was a ■_-. _ : (: h_ a tin- - 



which mi: le (he swamp ot which it was the incubus 

 more swampish still, and from which the rambler 



uiui. a jong vista or trees, witn an attractive 

 object to terminate the view, as in the case of the 



but if, as at Hampton Court, between tl 

 magnificent trees there is lying stretched out a long 



who have felt it, the strange grandeur of tranquillity 

 with which on a calm summer's-day that scene im- 

 bues the whole spirit. But it is obvious that this 

 beautiful effect arises simply and only from the 

 vastness of the space occupied — a vastness not oc 

 curring frequently among the average opportunities 

 of Landscape Gardening, and consequently an ex- 

 ception to the general rule. 



Contrast with this scene at Hampton Court a re- 

 tired citizen's taste as displayed in his pleasure- 

 grounds. His sheet of water is an oblonged pond, 

 not very spacious— there is fastened to a stake an 

 impracticable boat— there are floating on the sur- 

 face some Muscovy ducks — possibly there is a 



narrow paths flanked by clipped Box run paralleftc 

 the brink of the water— and as he paces on the 

 shaven Grass between the path and the brink, he 

 ■ tas done some Landscape Gar- 



»ed this great error ? The igno- 

 ding principles — the one, that in 



fancies that he 



ting where the 

 ked upon are w 



!'- .'. ' 



production or .deer nas Decome a suoject or some 

 Uy so at the present moment 



■ 

 expense of brewing will undoubtedly be much 



producing beer without the difficult operation of 



washing. In the housekeeper, therefore, sugar i> a 



and the trouble comparatr. 



not keep sound for a length of time, and therefore 

 were it more t, it could not 



:. ,,:.-- 



sugar beer ought 



ises ought to have the same preservative qualit; 



both have been properly treated. Leaving th 



question, however, to be determined by fiuut 



'ence, let us see how the value of malt, sugai 



olasses stand with regard to each other. 



t of extractive matter a given quantity ot 



eight ot a quarter 



' a quarter weighing 330 lbs. impai 



p in the process of brewing ; 2-201 

 high product, and not frequently 

 lerefore in comparing its value w 



igar, gum, and starch, or amylaceoi 



all the starch is converted to 

 ' lbs. of available matter from a . 

 consequently we have data by 

 ate it- real' value. Taking the 

 ract therefore at 1-54 and sugar 



s to produce the same effect ; cou 



4 lbs., and in the s< 

 r volumes will be -fU!K] and -(i-JSS 

 will be seen that sugar is rather 

 disregard- 

 equal; and if we take the 



■2.n>\\ 



isequently 



quarter; simply because, n tni 

 the su-ar is the dearest. 



This view of the brewers, 1 

 maintained, unless they can sho< 



according to analysis more than 147 lbs, 



and that thed o. Now it is 



manifest, from what is known, that this gum remains 



..■.•■■•.■■ 

 and, therefore, as gum is incapable ot 



. and as it imparts no flavour, it is 

 clearly so much dead matter. The gum, therefore, 



" i 6d. per lb., we 'have the follow- 

 ing 147 lbs. at 5d., tils, -kl., 147 !h*. at ■ !.. 73.*. <„/., 



. ; 15 :. j or 



, 61s. Srf., 



5 much sugar as the malt under 



:auces would yield, and taking 



rent mL, 58s. 4d., at M., 70s.: so 



uaiter, or at 6d., 70s. Molasses contains from 

 9 to 75 per cent, of sugar, so that if a medium 

 uality contain, sav 71 per cent, it would require, 

 ) eoual 140 lbs. of sugar, 197 lbs, which at4</.per lb., 

 ould be 65s. 8d. Sugar, therefore, at hd. per lb. 

 more valuable than molasses at id. even for 

 ensity only, and in point of flavour it is greatly 



iin.1 that the weight or strength of the beer is 

 erived exclusively from fermentable sweet matter, 

 ad not, as in the case of malt, from other substances, 

 i well. A wort, therefore, made from sugar re- 

 hops than a wort from 

 weights and quantities being equal. In the sugar 



7e-U : :. to : 



beer they exist i 



:.: v.-r. Tv 



rarbeerwesi, 



