(158) 
MoracEAE 
Ficus Krausiana subsimilis var. nov. 
(Pirate 164, Fics. 1, 2) 
Leaf lanceolate, entire, narrowed to the attenuate summit, 
at t 
divergent at acute angles from the midrib, ee out, extending 
close to, and bending upward along the m 
These are the first specimens eae this variety which 
I have thus far seen from Long Island; but a specimen from Block 
Island, which was originally referred to the species,* is clearly 
identical with the variety, which may be distinguished by its 
much thinner midrib and more elongated summit, in which latter 
feature it more nearly resembles F. Mohliana Heer.t Our Figure 
z should perhaps be questioned, inasmuch as the upper part of 
the specimen is missing, and it may represent either the species 
or the variety. 
Locality: King’s gravel pit, Roslyn, N. Y. Hollick, Sept. 26, 
1906. 
Ficus myricoiwes Hollick? 
(PLatE 166, Fic. 2) 
Ficus myricoides Hollick, in Newberry Monog. U. S. Geol. Surv. 
26 (Fl. Amboy Clays): 71, pl. 32, f. 18, pl. 47, f. 8,0. 1895 
This specimen agrees more or less satisfactorily, except in its 
larger size, with figures § and 9, on plate 41 of the Flora of the 
Amboy Clays (oc. cit.), and it is evidently identical with other 
specimens from Long Island,{ which have been referred to the 
species. It is unfortunate that the fragmentary nature of all of 
our specimens renders accurate comparison impossi 
Berry§ has criticized the generic reference of the species and 
also the specific identity of certain specimens which were referred 
to the species, and says: “This is especially true of the Long Island 
and Marthas Vineyard leaves which are larger and which suggest 
* Fieus Krausiana Heer,” Hollick, A., Annals New York Acad. Sci. 11: 
59, Pl. 3,f. 1. 1898 
+ Heer, O., ie Denkschr. — Gesellsch. Naturwissensch. 237 (Kreide-Fl, 
are 15, pl. 5, f. 2. 
t Hollick, i Monog. U. 5. eee Surv. 50 (Cret. Fl. S$. N. ¥. & N. Eng.): 
57, pl. 11, f.8,9 
§ Berry, E. W, Bull. 3 (Fl. Raritan Form.) Geol. Surv. N.J., 121. gtr. 
