(436) ' 
99. GOMPHIDIUS Fries, Gen. Hymen 8. 1836. 
Putrescent, solitary or gregarious: pileus convex, thick, 
fleshy, viscid: lamellae decurrent, waxy: spores black, 
elongated: veil glutinous or submembranous: stipe central, 
stout, fleshy, without a cortex sometimes subannulate. 
Type, G. glutinosus (Schaeff.) Fries. (Syll. 5: 1137.) 
This is used in the same sense as in the Sylloge. Itisa 
striking and well-marked genus. 
too. HYPHOLOMOPSIS nom. nov. Clements, Bot. Surv. 
Neb. 4: 23. 1896. Not Gymnochilus Blume. 1858. 
Putrescent, solitary or cespitose: pileus fleshy but thin and 
fragile, hygrophanous: lamellae adnate or adnexed: spores 
purplish-brown or dark fuscous: veil slight and evanescent 
or conspicuous and appendiculate, not forming an annulus: 
stipe central, fleshy, hollow, usually slender and fragile. 
Type, Hypholoma appendiculatum (Bull.). (Syll. 5: 
1039-) 
This is Hypholoma § Appendicularta, of the Sylloge. 
Gymnochilus was proposed by Blume as a substitute for 
Psathyra, but the author specifically based it on the subgenus 
Psathyra of Fries’s Systema Mycologicum. Fries’s type, so 
far as it can now be determined, was what is called Hypho- 
loma appendiculatum Bull., in the Sy//oge, which falls within 
the limits of this genus, although the author of Gymnochilus 
had no intention that.it should be so used. 
101. DRYOSOPHILA Quél. Ench. Fung. 115. 1886. 
Lachrymaria Pat. Hymén. Eur. 122 (metonym). 1887. 
Type, Hypholoma lacrymabundum (Fries). (Syll. 5: 1033.) 
Cortenopsis Schroet. Krypt. Fl. Schles. 3': 566 (typonym). 
1889. Type, Hypholoma lacrymabundum (Fries). (Syll. 
5: 1033.) 
Glyptosperma Fayod, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. VII. 9: 377 
(metonym). 1889. Type, Aypholoma velutinum (Pers.). 
(Syll. 5: 1034.) 
Putrescent, solitary or cespitose: pileus fleshy, thin, rather 
firm, viscid or squamulose, not hygrophanous: lamellae 
