(77) 
Previously recorded from the Atane schists of Greenland 
and the Dakota group of Kansas. 
MacnourA WoopsripcGensis Hollick. Pl. 53. fi 5; pi. 
57. fr 2. 
Magnolia Woodbridgensis Hollick, in Newb. Fl. Amboy 
Clays, 74. pl. 36. f. 11; pl. 57. f- 5-7. 1896. Hol- 
lick, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 16: 133. pl. 14. f &. 
1897; Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 11: 60. pl. 3. f. 2. 1808. 
While the fragments shown on Plate 53 have the venation 
entirely obscured, I have no hesitation in referring them to 
the above species, especially as I have found other smaller 
fragments with the characteristic venation of Magnolza. 
Judging from the nearly parallel lateral margins of the 
fragment shown on plate 57 it would seem to indicate a 
rather longer leaf than the typical Magnolia Woodridgensis, 
a leaf more like Magnolia Boulayana Lesq. or Magnolia 
glaucoides Newb. ‘The incomplete nature of the specimen, 
however, and the total obliteration of the venation make it 
preferable to place it under AZ. Woodbridgensts. Leaf-blade 
apparently quite thick. 
MAGNOLIA TENUIFOLIA Lesq. 7%. 47. f. 10. 
Magnolia tenutfolia Lesq. Am. Jour. Sci. 46: 100. 
1868; Cret. Flora, 92. Al. ar. f. z. 18743 Fl. Dak. 
Group, 198. pi. 24. fiz. 1892. 
Previously known from the Dakota Group at Decatur, 
Neb., Kansas, and Peace River, Northwest Territory. 
Our fragment is very similar to fz. pl. 24, Fl. Dak. 
Group, of this species, except that the secondaries are some- 
what straighter and more regular. 
There is considerable resemblance to Magnolia Capellinit 
Heer, which is doubtfully recorded from Sayreville, N. J., 
Glen Cove, L. I., and Martha’s Vineyard, as well as from 
the Dakota of the West and from Greenland. 
Ours, while only a fragment, denotes a more elongated 
leaf than that of M. Capellinit. 
