58 



75. punctiforniis, Say, Trans. Am. Phil. 11. 58. 7.5-8 L. Sup. Ga. 



—ibid. IV. 423. ; Lee. Syn. 50.— rufipess, Dej. Tex. X. Y. Kb, 



Spec. III. 113— foveicollis, Chd. Bull. Mosc. Fla. 



1843. IV. 764. 



76. sordens, Kirby, Faun. Bor. Am. IV. 25. ; fits- 5.2 Can. L. Sup. 



cescens, Chd. Brit. Col. 



77. picicornis, Lee. Proc. Ac. Phil. 1860. p.- 319. 6 North AWst. 



? similis, Kirby, Faun. Bor. Am. IV. 27. ? fro- 

 gilis, Mann. Bull. Mosc. 1853. III. 142. Com- 

 parison of specimens is necessary to establish 

 this supposed synonymy. 



78. ruficornis, Lee. Agass. L.Sup. 205.— Lee. Syn. 7.5-8 Can. L. Sup. 



53.—picipennis, var. C & D Kirby, Fauna Bor. Alas. 



Am. 25. gratiosus. Mann. Bull. Mosc. 1853. 



III. 142, Chaudoir apud Lee. Trans. Am. Ent. 



Soc. 1869. p. 248, states that Agonum lenum 



Dej. is Ag. picipenne, var. C Kirby, in which 



case the name will take the precedence of 



that proposed by me and 81 will retain the 



name given by Kirby. 



79. retractus, Lee. Ann. IV. 228. 



80. gemellus, Lee. new species. 



81. picipennis, Kirby, Fauna Bor. Am. IV. 25. Lee. 



Syn. 23. Ag. lenum, Lee. Ann. Lye. IV. 229. 

 elongatulus, Hald. Proc. Ac. Phil. L[300. dilu- 

 tipennis, Mots. Bull. Mosc. 1864. IV. 322. 



82. lutulentus, Lee. Syn. 34. 5.5 L.'Sup. H.B.T< 



Ills. N. Y. 



83. nigriceps, Lee. Ann. Lye. IV. 259. 5 L.Sup. Br.Col- 



