rEBBUART 6, 1920] 



SCIENCE 



131 



education. Science, n. s. 50 : 263-269, Sept. 19, 

 1919. 



Gager, C. S. Horticulture as a profession. Sci- 

 ence, n. s. 49: 293-300, Mar. 28, 1919. 



Gager, C. S. The near future of botany in Amer- 

 ica. Science, n. s. 47: 101-115, Feb. 1, 1918. 



Galloway, B. T. The twentieth century botany. 

 Science, n. s. 19 : 11-18, Jan. 1, 1904. 



Ganong, W. F. Some reflections upon botanical 

 education in America. Science, n. s. 31 : 321- 

 334, Mar. 4, 1910. 



Hitchcock, A. S. The scope and relations of taxo- 

 nomic botany. Science, n. s. 43 : 331-342, Mar. 

 10, 1916. 



Jones, L. E. The relations of plant pathology to 

 the other branches of botanical science. Phyto- 

 path. 1: 39-44, 1911. 



Lefevre, G. The introductory course in zoology. 

 Science, n. s. 50: 429-431, Nov. 7, 1919. 



Livingston, B. E. Some responsibilities of botan- 

 ical science. Science, n. s. 49: 199-207, Feb. 

 28, 1919. 



Lyman, G. E. The need for organization of Amer- 

 ican botanists for more effective prosecution of 

 war work. Science, n. s. 47: 279-285, Mar. 22, 

 1918. 



Nichols, G. E. The general biology course and the 

 teaching of elementary botany and zoology in 

 American colleges and universities. Science, 

 n. s. 50: 509-517, Dec. 5, 1919. 



Orton, W. A. The biological basis of international 

 phytopathology. Phytopath. 4: 11-19, 1914. 



Osborn, H. Zoological aims and opportunities. 

 Science, n. s. 49: 101-112, Jan. 31, 1919. 



Peirce, G. J. What kinds of botany does the 

 world need now? Science, n. s. 49: 81-84, Jan. 

 24, 1919. 



The reconstruction of elementary botanical teach- 

 ing. New Phytologist, Dec, 1917. A series of 

 papers. 



Eitter, "W. E. A business man's appraisement of 

 biology. Science, n. s. 44 : 820-822, Dec. 8, 1916. 



Roiberts, H. P. Agricultural botany in secondary 

 education. Science, n. s. 50: 549-559, Dec. 19, 

 1919. 



Shear, C. L. Fdrst 'decade of the American Phy- 

 topatholo'gical Society. Phytopath. 9: 165-170, 

 1919. 



Shull, A. F. Biological principles in the zoology 

 course. Science, n. s. 48: 648-649, Dec. 27, 

 1918. 



Stevens, N. B. American botany and the great 

 war. Science, n. s. 48 : 177-179, Aug. 23, 1918. 



Stockberger, W. W. The social obligations of the 

 botanist. Science, n. s. 39: 733-743, May 22, 

 1914. 



Trelease, "W. Botanical opportunity. Bot. Gaz., 

 22: 193-217, Sept., 1896; Smithsonian Eeport, 

 1898: 519-536. 



Zeleny, C. The personal relation of the investiga- 

 tor to his problem. Science, n. s. 50: 175-179, 

 Aug. 22, 1919. William Trelease 



The Univeksitt op Illinois 



THE BIOCHEMIST ON THE HOSPITAL 

 STAFF 



During the past few years there has been, 

 gradually evolving in the general mind, and 

 particularly the medical mind, the idea that; 

 the chemist is actually something more tharsi 

 a druggist or a detector of arsenic. The 

 present records of the efforts directed towards 

 an elucidation of the reactions of the human 

 organism in health and disease, along the 

 lines of chemical investigation, are an 

 achievement that by their very import, if not 

 their voluminousness, have forcibly directed 

 the attention of the medical profession to 

 the possibility that here is a line of attack 

 worthy of notice. The rapid progress being 

 made is adding so much to the fundamental 

 knowledge of how the organism carries on its 

 activities, that the solution of the many 

 problems being brought to light is most turbid 

 in the minds of the chemical physician and 

 he is turning to the biochemist for clarifica-- 

 tion. Scientific medicine to-day acknowl- 

 edges the fundamental value of chemistry 

 in the fight for the prevention and cure of 

 disease; it recognizes now, as never before, 

 the need of ascertaining the basic facts con- 

 cerned in body reactions and that the satis- 

 fying of that need rests in the intensive ap- 

 plication of biochemical methods to the study 

 of the human organism. Outside of diabetes 

 there is a general lack of definite information 

 concerning the intricate processes going on, 

 giving rise to, or accompanying pathological 

 conditions, and there is opening up a larger 

 opportunity for acquisition of this informa- 

 tion through the open-hearted cooperation 

 between physician and scientist that is now 

 becoming evident. 



