1919.] Bardic and Histl. Survey of Rajputana. 79 
than the date which the Jodhpur Chronicles give for the birth 
of Sujo. Taking it for granted that the Jodhpur chroniclers 
would alter any the date of Sajo, the date Samvat 1497 which 
they give for Viko is probably the correct one. The correct 
date of Sujo might have been preserved in the Bikaner Chron- 
icles, but unfortunately none of the Bikaner Chronicles ex- 
amined by me gives any date for the birth of this prince. In 
a Chronicle of Jodhpur,! however, I have found for Sujo a date 
different from the one given by the other Chronicles, and this 
might possibly be the correct date. It is Samvat 1499. If this 
date is correct, Viko was elder than Sajo by about two years.? 
L. P. TrEssitori. 
Bikaner, 25th April, 1918. 
tC. 38, p 
2 Thou aie portent of this kind are ot worthless and even aa 
a yet the fact that Sajo outlived 6 by several years, may hav 
me significance as ‘corroborative evidence in re our of Vik6é’s siderahia: 
Both Vik6o and Sijo died a natural dea 
LPP RR 
