1919.] The Rajput Kingdoms of Mediaeval Chhattisgarh. 239 
“To defend these territories an army of 14,000 men with 116 
‘elephants was p- 
“The whole revenue of area tire is “are to have 
“ amounted to. Rs. 6,57,019 ...... The ing may be ac- 
“cepted as a very nearly accurate ateenne arc of the revenue 
‘‘ then assessed on Raipore’’ (with which District as Settlement 
Officer Mr. Hewitt was alone concerned). 
‘* KHALSA PERGUNNABS.!”’ 
Name of Pergunnah. No. of Revenue. 
Villages. Rs. 
Amera 84 4,800 
Raipore 640 85,600 
Khallaree 84 3,000 
Droog 84 15,000 
Lowan 252 (84x 3) 55,160 
Seerpore 84 5,000 
Tengnaghur (now 
owrea) 84 225 
Deeorbeejah 84 13,000 
Seersa (doubtful) 84 800 
imga 84 5,000 
Singungurh (doubtful) 84 2,300 
Rajim 84 9,036 
atun 152 32,000 
Akulwara (doubtful) 84 2,845 
Mohdee 84 3,100 
Suarmar 84 3,100 
‘* PERGUNNAHS HELD BY SUBORDINATE ZAMINDARS. 
Dhumda Surda 568 15,513 
Balod Sanjaree 795 72,156 
Dbhumturry 750 81,212 
Feringeshwar 84 78 
4,333 4,08,925 
“Of the Pergunnahs held by Subordinate Zamindars 
‘‘Dhumda was held by a Gond Raja, Balod and Sunjaree by 
“the descendant of the Gond Raja of Mandla, and Dhumturee 
é by t ae Kakeir Raja. 
. Hewitt inferred from the above account that the 
Haihaibansis ‘formed their Government on the model of their 
tricts were assigned to subordinate chiefs who with their 
! Compare the Atharah Garh of Raipur given above in para. 7. 
