84 Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. [N.S., XVI, 
deva which were issued in the 12th century of the Vikrama era. 
Unless one is to admit the existence of another Asalladeva who 
struck coins of the same type two centuries ago it is difficult 
to explain the date on these coins in any other way. 
salladeva was succeeded by his son Gopaladeva, who is 
known from the inscriptions of his son, Ganapati. No coins of 
this king has been discovered as yet. Gopaladeva’s son Gana- 
patideva is known from two stone inscriptions :— 
1) The Surwaya inscription on the Vikrama era of the 
Vikrama year 1348 = 1292 A.D. and (2) the Narwar inscriptions 
of the Vikrama year 1355=1298 A.D. The Gwalior find con- | 
tains 147 issues of Ganapati-deva. Cunningham has recorded 
two dates found on the coins of Ganapati-deva, viz. V.S. 1348 
and 1355, but the date of the coin of Ganapati published by 
him is illegible (Pl. XII, 15). 
Since the writing of this note Mr. M. B. Garde has published 
his note on the Jajapella dynasty in the Indian Antiquary, Vol. 
XLVII, 1918, pp. 241-244. R. D. BANERJI. 
202. Pratindra Gotp Corns. 
Pratihara dynasty of Mahodaya (Pl. XIII, No. 1) 
R. D. Banerst. 
203. Go~p Coin or Upayapeva. 
__The gold coins described in the following lines were found 
in the Central Provinces. They were described by the reporter 
as coins of Gangeyadeva. But the three-line legends on the 
obverse is clearly :— 
1. Sri-mad= U- 
2 -daya-de- 
3. -va. (Pl. XIII, No. 2). 
The only prince of this name who ruled in Central and - 
Northern India is the Paramara Chief Udayaditya, who was a 
relative of the Cedi king Karnadeva and for whom we have 
the certain dates A.D. 1059 and 1080. It is therefore clear 
that the coin is the only known issue of the Paramara kings. 
R. D. BaneEpgizt. 
