1920.] Numismatic Supplement No. XXXIV. ° 205 
Mandelslo also speak of both Gouro and Bengala, and distinctly 
imply that they were not identical. All this is not very illumi- 
nating, and it is not easy to say ‘where this ‘ alleged city of 
Bengala’ was, but it is fairly clear, if any r Coeee is to be 
placed on these statements, that it was not Gau 
I may say at once that I do not lay seasile stress on the 
point myself, but it is not impossible that others may be in- 
clined to take a different view. The old European maps are not 
being = to the same objecti ons 
is in a vaulted chamber, at agageh built by the 
eye in 1007 A.H.! The entire record was edited and translated 
tas concentric circles. The peeing ate circle of each oe bh Se 
with the names of the best known tow India, Per Ara 
the outer and inner circles of “a ay jae hs Gagieiies and latitudes 
+ commenced 
S, 
ommen with Daulatabad, Ahmadnagar, and ending with Sonargaon, 
Dany alah, re Datei (stc).”” Proceedings, A.S.B., 1890, pp. 148-9. nae 
t is not easy to say where this ‘ City of Bengala’ really was, oc if it 
all. : ; : A a 
: 8 
. — ed. pr hciong: » 85.) niet balioved that it had been ‘‘ carried 
way by the ” (Me Be ig ed. 1788, p. 57). insole was inclined 
ni think inne ae ch town eve exisied.” J.A.S.B., site : ae 
of K har.” °‘‘ Another curiosity is, that bj 
adshah, at a hill called Seepoozah, the ock was cut, and a recess made, 
which he ca In the inscription in this recess are wr ten 
the names of —— Babur Badshah, rza Kamran, Meerza 
Uskuree, Meerza Hundal..... ut Hoomayoon Badshah,.not bei f 
the kings there, ag penn ian ition. os t there, seeing 
nat the names of Hoomayoon and Ukbar Shah and their countries, were 
not me .* e my heart t names of t 
countries and cities ~ rie purpose, I called bite Bukkur good wri 
stone-cutters, wh ote the names of Hoomay 
Huzrut Shahun Shah Ukbar, and also of their countries and cities, from 
