1920. ] Numismatic Supplement No. XXXIV. 249 
This does not mean that we are permitted to “ regard -pir, 
“pg -garh, -pattan and -abod as always interchangeable. 
As om it. We should thereby only create inextricable con- 
ion and make it almost impossible to identify Indian place- 
Junagadh, 2nd January, 1918. S. H. Hoprvata. 
ag alae s Reprint, IV, 130.) It is also mentioned in the Voyages of 
James Lancaster, p. 239. Sir Thomas Roe speaks of it as ‘ Ma lda- 
ssy, : 
shining the. Ed. Foster, 94) and ‘‘ at one op favoured the idea of 
ing rand se she — “ wn from the Mogul with a view to geal 
ie ran = the English.” Foster, The Eng 
ve the name of a peo hunting-seat of the Mughal Em- 
perors near Agra is usually written Samigarh ( 3f ge) Badishahnama, 
II, 355, 361, 262; ‘Alamgirnama, 111,112; Madagir-- i-‘Alamgiri, 7, but the 
Emperor Jahangir always speaks of it as Saminagar ( , $3 game) Tizuk-i 
Jahingiri, Text, 98, 99, 121, 274, 326, 327; Rogers and Beveridge, Trans. I, 
202, 203, 248; II, 95, ase 200. Khafi hin has Samiigadh (838 yom) 
Sper edn Text, I, 598; II, 22, 7, 700, 718 
a mry informs us that Abal Fass Sikandarpir Shae Ces in 
wakes Howni 5 as Sikanda pee Memoirs of the Rac 
8 
i pie 
of the North-Western Previn io “of India, ed. Beames, Vo 1 ety 91. 
Elsewhere, the same authority tells us cn Aone Bahri i ghd 
as Salim ra. IJbid., II, 136 
i. hmann assures t ag 
ken Sse. to the shorter form Salima ch na it is still 
own at the p = ’ otes on Places of i Hintoeical: fatevest in the 
'S.B., 1870,p. 1 
5 0 again, the Manikdeug of Abil Fazl (Ain, toni = et Jarrett, IT. 
— and the * Alamgirnama (Text, 1025) is no w show ikgarh in our 
maps and atlases. Imp, Gaz. Atlas, Pl. 39, B 3; Constable’ s Hand Atlas 
of India, Pl. 32, A b. 
eee Se = ee ee 
