48 
THE 
GARDENERS CHRONICLE. 
contained a covenant 
Surface and a royalty for the 
4 . the premises for a 
that the lessor would grant 
term of vol to co) 
The defendant refused to 
the 
a further sen’ 
and upwards a Fost parsed ore specific per- 
to graut the newlease. His — Vice 
, after entering its of the 
ld direct an issué ‘to try the Looe vwhether a 
nh bye of an: —. weno e lessees 
king the sai ceording to 
re did not Seg that noe snout be 
* would be aren’ - have the = bod 
i his respect mig’ 
trial, and at the same time the opinion o ponmeet 
construction of the co 
issue dis 
eee 
w obtained w n the 
Morris v. Vivian and po NA 
tion to le a defen 
application fee an haga 
ute a 
cellor did n 
cordingly re’ peconry 
Faith and Another v. Aguilar — Gibbs and (Co.—This 
uurt made on behalf of the defendants, Maura, 
motion also asked t 
absolutely dissolve the injanculaes that it wou 
much of the injunction as restrained the Sasa, G 
ing in an action at law 
defend ay M . Gib’ , might have, under - 
stance he case, they being eceme trustees “ot the pills, a1 d not 
= phe of Aguilar, w who have Santee er esects notwithstanding 
he injunction which in this case ed against them 
¥ and caster esa vias Chadealios 
Ww ve ju ent in this case, which had been heard in 
privat m on the . and the 4th inst. It had been brought 
on as a motion for an injune to restrain the defendants, were 
assignees, fri ying any dividend which might be declared upon 
bts which ha nome or h r might be p oved aga: the 
de 
joint and separate 
of the Court, or, at ry events, without reserving s d 
insure 40 ,0001., with interest, to peek ge the. plaintiff misty to be 
entitled col the will of a Mr. W. Hind, who had during his life 
a. with the Donkrapts, t 
duane we woolstaplers i. eafter read. 
articles of Seine. and the salt at: the testator 
vet h had al a taken place in ourt of 
Review, the di = hy cog wholly uninteresting, stated that 
by mir Saar 
mt —Thorp¥. 0 y. Owen and yg In this case the plain- 
tiff pov for Pade go to make an entry in Six Clerks’ office of a 
memoran Le pag = of the copy iy: the Lacey’ bill, which 
was a pant son e, omitting the interrogating part thereof, upon 
wi 
John Willis Grane, cael the defendants.—Order gran 
therefore “~ rule for — the ne for the 
ust be absolute 
pub! of a libel upon the justices assem- 
bled at sessions, in sar n slande 
were by him upon them relation to the nti 
Lae a ‘The counsel for the wigtaent however, having said that 
was instructed by his client to apologize for the libel, “the rule was 
tise 
gor bon v. Rosser.—T 
arriage tried last term, 
6002. mg ~ 
Aik £, 
ag agi fora breach of  seggac ot of 
ng 
his 
ning! he jur 
An abeteact of bo trial was give 
application was now made for a Shay to hoe 
vnaties should not be set part and a new — should 
that the damages were exces The 
saa ee be as well for the parties to ‘hav ins 
‘to consider wheter ‘thes could not agree to fix some reasonable 
ount of damages and therefore gave leave to the learned counsel 
oD» Soree tee. ‘ Bird 
x on.—This was an application for a rule to show 
ithe B Sot tered in this euss abo uld not be set aside, and 
besconins J 
a new trial granted.—Rul ted. 
The Queen v, Kenri elder and younger. .—This was an in- 
dictment against the two defendants for conspiracy to defraud G. oA 
Featherstonhaugh of a sum of 168/. by fa! falsely vepneccaigag’ a phaeton 
anda et ir of | canary to be the property ofa lady, The case was trie 
before Lord De when a verdict of ty was pronounced. 
ppli eo * made to set aside that verdict. on several 
y. Mobbs.— This was a motion for 
rul show cause why the Siainiitt should not be at liberty to 
issue an execution on the judgment obtained in the cause, notwith- 
writ Rul ted. 
otion fora writ of 
Sreadiag gaol, to bring up 
mmitted to Read- 
e bo 
0 arran 
ing mot une this « cae , have : 
ams said, that 
ag. di 
: ae t had been guilty 
n the provisions of the Vagran' 
yt! hing in objection taken by the counsel 
ence that he could fast five years 
ON LEAS. ies Goddard.— 
le to show cause ‘vty the verdict haind oa the af 
t stand, the issues be entered gene- 
pee a debt of 300/., and de- 
he first ‘eae the general issue ; secondly, pay- 
ment; and maly, a set-off to a greater amount than the sum claimed 
in the declaration.—Rule ee a 
ee and others vy. Heathorn and others.—This was an applica- 
m for a an to show cause vine the ve erdict which had been found 
ul t be ™ — an a verdict be entered for 
before the aes Chief Justice 
as brought to recover a 
plicit ao and directors 
of the Soin 1th American ng esto on. Seve eral obj ections 
were le during the trial, bat overruled ; L 
pe are to ena. a verge for the plaintiffs, edna the pn rw leave 
move.— 
pad mone a a ogee and others.—This action, it will be rem 
bered, was ‘tried at the London sittings after last term, bef 
as bi yy Mr. 
In the matter of Browne’s Charity.—This was a ~aereeetiee resented 
by Walter Hunter, John higem ~ Walter bere Bg nd that 
rd, Bow, and 
by pb. -antmbe transferring 
claimed exempt! tion from the ees a the petition. 
Lord Lan le said that the costs which had been incurred had been 
occasioned by the rector; and therefore . a 
costs of the petition er, but also those of Mr. Hoil 
Court oF pee 's ian: 
jection. appears 
the fund, but they 
— The Queen v. John Kemble Chapman, 
— 
arked t their iron 
Applica- 
aside and a new trial had, on ‘the ground of misdirection, 
being against tin Riile ted. 
m,—This was a motion for a rule to 
olng been found oe Ben Bop cic 
trialhad. The tried 
done as 
of Lords for improving the city of Norwic 
wi 
through the House 
on the ground of misdirection. The Court 
motion was abade 
t le. 
Printer and rer of the ** Peete 2 tarsal om rh, ~~ an appli- 
pee on the Grove, the of Greenwich, 
a rule yraee ? we defendant to tm cause vay" . criminal in 
peck: should not be filed against him for a libel on Mr. Grove, 
which had eft abe in the Sunday Times newspaper of the - 1st Nov., 
1841, The article complained of was headed, ‘* Heartless Conduct 
of Mr. Grove, the peter amity * and contained some severe ani 
versions on n Mr. BA resi bce 85 magistrate.—Rule granted. 
The Queen v. the L ich Railway Company.—This 
was an application fi defendants to show cause 
why a mandamus shi not ise them to direct a 
mpensation which o' 
Messrs. Payne and Asset vinegar-merchants, in yee 
ee ys ‘the ey ve which oe. had sustained in consequence fof 
the construction railway.—Rule granted. 
Queen v. the Rev. Henry Cleveland.—This an application 
part of Eat Fitzhardinge for arule ialitie wpe upon the defendant 
information should not be filed 
The libel complai 
uced 
ung lady el the - b te 
of Bristo! Husions were wns to in the letter of su aoe horas 
hat the noble Earl felt satisfied he was the Siok , vaen = 
inquiri had ascertained that the defendant ’ was the 
-General.—This w otion for a 
Pus pate * the Pest- 
1, commanding him to 
scotch tae, but who 
proce had intimated tna he wie not comply with the — of the 
Je t the case was one of fect novelty, 
var ge court to 
Gen he wane renew the 
se it must now wie nites as refu 
Thom as Row was an application ‘for a-rule 
je upon the def str to show cause why an nga in the 
ba warranto should not issue commanding him to show 
es Fg e exercised the office of town-councillor of Lich- 
one, ihh ay is was an action for trespass. The —— 
was a justice e peace in the county . ioe oes had con 
Monee plaintif feo the gam nahn for having u' evo! sr 
hare in his possession, not peli Hos msed for tha vy i e in- 
the Gelettiant adjudicated = heen Br rg 
The — iff brought 
1 on which 
re another justice. 
false imprisonment, ‘aha 4 he 
con stapey was illegal. At the trial, the j jury assessed the damages at 
ut the Pasig “ng gt the plaintiff on some eee objec- 
amount of t A re 
obtained, ace apes | ston the tae reserved, and the case was 
course of las Lord e man now ap rn ed | 
aries ~— ‘one —_ = c court. was mer to of opinion yr under 
mpetent fe a pert to hear and de- 
ly been exhibi ted 
hich had peorious : belore 
Courr or ExcuEequek.—The Attorney General y. Pearson.—The 
Attorney-General said he was aa to obtain the Beet “of the 
rt on aq on of very t importance seneng ress ey od 
of the eye hot ere aware that lhe 
liamen’ t th uity provi he Court ino woe ccm 
ject and subject was abohated, and all Labrie then n pending at the 
‘qaity side of the Court were serge to the f Chancery. 
The question which he wished to submit to thet to ordships 
iwue ~— Li eae orp of the Court in revenu well 
cases betw: 5 eae nd subject, had been tra: saaterrea ey a 
‘of Chanee cary? itted that the lan nguage of the Act of 
Pp. left the vai in some doubt, but he believed that the 
opinion o cue best acquainted with the subject was, that the 
gene of the Act did not on the equity oe of the Cou a 
revenue causes to b ferred. Lord A said that t 
Court would give no definite opinion on the paints but ahey thought 
pigpalpo nell. + should be argued in the first instance 
ms oa or. 
bag Harford.—This was an action for the infringement of a 
patent “which was tried before Baron se and a verdict found oso 
"An a) nde agri 
= e on the’ york of the defendant for a ee calling on 
how ora why th ar Master should not be directed to 
Court 
wghes.—This was an application to set aside a 
judgment in an ‘action on pr e ng inst the near as the 
public axes ofa banking company.—Rule to show se granted. 
q hat property the late Theo P 
entitled to at the tim me of nis deat Mr Rowe, who appeared for 
to the jury, said that in 
the 
1813 Mr. Hook gape an sepeintmadt: under government in t 
Mauritius, whie h he continued to fill * _ ha it was found 
there was a iency i a peed sie was 
ecou 
ult t of which was org he was 
tion of himself and some friends it was su 5 
if the Court should be of opinion that Mr. I c rt mre | 
his property would be liable to be seized by the © Crown, inasmuch as 
his other debts and liabili subs: estioer period. 
It a red that before his death, Mr. Hook, pea had been iffi- 
culties, borrowed 4 a Mr. 
Hook ma 
Mr. 
a 
possessed at the To 
%. This, however he failed to do, an r. Edwa 
r him to the ount of 40001. 
editor of that pub- 
red 5002, a Ont ope hy ‘Mr. . Bd Tt 
| he had receiy tel bang in a tbls bl and bee the di i ae bred soon hat 
| been paid the b02. from 
the C se 
wards i 
‘ound ot Sere nym 3 its priority Pat < 1 nt th woul tak P ties 
‘be claim, oe € mortgage deed 
on Mr. H 8 interest in the vt 
high 
held 
John Bull” would be thereby ren- 
ST 
dered as valueless as a piece of waste paper. Witnesses Mid 
ealled by Mr. Rowe, and their testimony established the truth 
abo ent. Mr. Edwards also underwent a lengthened 
nation, during which he admit d the facts as stated by Mr. Roy 
but added that Mr. Hook altogether owed him 80007, a! t the: time ¢ 
his death, and he had applied the 40002. = d iawiatng 
amount. Mr. Hopkinson addressed the court on beha ‘of Br 
wards, and contended that he yisefn if 
after cons siderable discussion, the 
appeared in padanee, so leav 
the facts as they 
contest the matter hereafter in the Court of Excheque 
TERSALL'S—Tu 
Tur Densy.—The only bets laid wee 1.00 0 re 
clark’ Meteo: : 1,000 to 25 agst Lord Westminster’s Aw 
to 40 Lord one terfie Id’s Joanna colt, and 2,500 to 
owt at Mr. Pettit's “eee 
MAR K LANE, Fripay, JA —The new Wheat sold 
Monday pone im ee ealigien, ‘consequently several refus 
it from which cause the market i s exceed 
iey 
508.5 i hak and insurance include 
n as on Monday.—The Oat tents isinas 
regen r Imperial Quarter. 
serous Essex, Kent, and Suffolk . White 3 to ve Red 
Norfolk, eokuates and Yorkshire % 64 to 66 ' White oan 
Maltin, ge deng distilling 26 to80 Grind, 24to 
Oaes ici «ad, Yorkshire Se sles jan 18to 23 Feed 18 
vais “and nee sone Fe = 22 to 23 Potato 24 ti 
pe Sac te . Feed 14to £0 Potato 
_ 386, to 42 
Sinua; Mazagan, old and new 4 26 't 036" “THe 27to 40 Harrow 80 30 to 
ss — — md. . . 36to44 Winds. a = 50 Longpod 32 to 
Peas, Whit + « «+ 820036 Maple 033 Grey 
WEEKLY pena Seon AVERA in - 
— — — | — Rye. | Beans 
Dec. 3 - Praag 44 5 0-4 
— 10 . ‘ . " : 2 ; - : 44 8 39 0 
am IF ° . 62 9 30 5 21 5 39 5 37 (9 
_ 24 . . . 62 10 30 2 2 A 44 8 3%_ 0 
— al . . ~| 6&1 29-9 20 7 43 6 36 0 
Jan. 7 . ‘ -| 0 29° 7 20 7} 39 9 36 0 
6 weeks’ Aggregate Aver. 62 11 8] a14| 4 91 a bs 
Dutie: -'"@ 8] 1610! 15 3!. 6 6] 14 O 
GAZETTE OF THE WEEK. 
ENTS.—J. pen Fase Hat Inn, Ealing, Middlesex, 
Cc outhshire, a, and ——— 
Heslop, Ripley, anand A ’Smit , Bath, 
—J, Cuisset, fackiriare road, Gairey, jeweller. 
AN KRUPTS.—T. Kite ~ynie Arundel. street, Coventry-s 
s Sto 
INSOLV. 
victualler—J- 
eet,’ Mid 
in, Bishop tford, Hertfo rdshire, fonkerper SM "Me 
merchant—A. Fri eet, Cheapside, warehow 
Smith per} J. W. Smith, ‘Anton, Staffordshire, pa Li hy, vemeine 
Northampton, shoe m manutac turer—D. Davies, jun., Glanch rwadley Lian 
ery geire, flan — Shinsfacnaicics: Vv. ober: rts, Rawmarsh, Yorkshii 
enlot, Cornwall, fronfoun der—G. Howarth, > 
Middlesex whale r of “paneua 
Tooley capet, aeeeny linendrap 
Lambeth, boot and shoe manufacturer—W. Prd bulge 
give er—J. Ellison, Leeie 5 
Wiltshire, inakeerex 5. 
—J. Sutcliffe, Halifax, 
penter, Chippenham, 
mingham, painters s—A. Spoor, sen.,and A -, Newcastle 
ilders—H. Tugwell, Fawley, eee “farme r—J. n 
tockport, cotton mantufacturer— Ng - ie WwW. Clough, Ece! no 
pe neashire, alkali oufacturers—R Alleth * Letra Carunel, an 
cashire, banker. an 
es: ges SEQUE 
rpet magufactarere—a. mete 
i 
ATIONS.—J. Déans, Peacockban ik, and T. 
per 3 merchant — De 
r and dyer—J- 
” Glas ae oth merchant—D.§ 
* Dunfermline, piroe 7 and brass fow 
Seay alae, 
W, Arbuc ckle airs 
aoe f 
Lindsay, Glasgow, vie 
n Switzerland, Mrs 
2 ke oa 
. F. Vulli 
BIRTHS—On the 3d inst., at Neufcbatel, 
of a son—On the 5th ot at 56, Hunter- scdeet. Mrs. Mardon, ‘of a son— 
the 6th inst.,.at Stratton Strawless, in Norfolk, Mrs. Arnold Kep pel 
aughter: i a son, stillb 
— 
:F. 
Taylor, of ie coklectersh ~equar 
Wi ndaot, the wife of J. Frazer, Esq., of 
worth, Herts, on the 6th inst., the ady 
th inst.» ~ ae Se te Abani gh, Esq. 
Low lap funt, ofa Sete At13, Great Coram-street, 
a ae on a 9th pay a lady of Lieut.-ColC. Smyth, C.B., ofa 
th e reo » at the St, , atheriag D Dock- house, the widow ‘of the late C. Gi 
sq 
ae 
RIE the 16th Nov. 
Prior, ri one the 24d Light Infantry, 
ter of Major-Ge ee —_ Nan, C. B., com 
pra se cote eldest son é- homas’s Chu 
st so 
third para of Col. Ray, of EI do House 
8tlpinstant, at Lee eer h, William 
beth, only —— er 0} ted Ive, Esq- fee Meaildee, both 
the lath ule. +, at Ham —- h, ah son of the 
jt ere ghee a ates 
rr vier 
J ones, Esa ny 
e G, N. Linck, Es 
ndia Com 
m, of Sngien: cour’ Ys, in 
ction, between Cabul ons Teletatn ds os 
be Wyean the et British werent — ry, 8 - pokes be oa 
o am, © undhill-gran, r Win 
Wyndham, of Dinton, Wilts — 3 
es 
INDEX OF THE PRINCIPAL “aga oe pateagis suByECTS 
No. 
Alkalies of plant + 4a Sich w kind 
Amateurs Garden : Pt . Masters, and: gardeners, relation 
Apples, a selection or. ee the . ‘ 
value of root-pruning ; sa Mas s Nurtety, noticed * 
d . = Melon, “Cuan sy . 
th . 
bi 
pill » 
a} Oncidium Insleag! ti 
20 «| Oxalis crenata, its excellence 
a selection of . . 
But . 
Sernssaie iliqua, notived . 
Chatsworth, described ee 
7 | Cena nium as an edging 
lay, to aereeey: b| Peas their germination at va- 
Soneed Allen's Victory off perat 
Currant, black, to prune to raise ear! 
gs $ improvement . rif e Peat, a substitute i 
$ for ‘ pd s Pipes, hot-water, their radiating 
ower 
dgings, 
er se 
" ‘their vitality ‘ 
ork 
ls i = b al Poineatth tia, its s trea atment . 
Bpidendrum jatiiab + 24a| Polyanthus, its — e . 
Poresting, lens o - 19 HY Pots, glazed . 
Fruit- oe sae eae formation 22 he Pottle, its cont ao . 
Gardener, life 2i innet, ite co s 
sesnera nee neath a greenhouse “ih ododendrons, situation of 
lant « * 21 ¢, Root-pruning, remark 
Gesnera zebri 
Hand, describe 
Hemer 
° 
J 
o 
°o 
- 
_ 
- 25 
+ 256 
+ 22b, 24 vi inery, angle of root 
can Or- Wheat, its culture 
+» 24d Tadic 
bd 4 Wood- sorrel aa an edging: 
He ae we 8 ole ew ane 
in ~~ West 
ht’s Nurser hotbed t 
Lobelia pytanidatis . : 
Y Paleo 
Printed by Messrs. Brapsury and E Lombard-street, Fleet-s 
the Prectubeet t Whitefriar, in be City at Landon, ee Prbliahed By b 
the Orricz, 3, Caantxs-sraser, Covent GARD in the y of 
where all A Advertisements and Tenens ay ne adarened 
fete, 
Editor.—Saturday, January 15, 1942, 
