errs AVIS 
THE 
GARDENERS’ 
CHRONICLE. 
[May 28, 
nst the 
ay 
— re 
en ss zits of man kin “Ms It 
iad = which, notwithstanding the dishonour 
ces France, is still acting 
aff 
t has panstaeta ed in to 
es irae the individual 
i ment, 
[=] 
7 
fad 
[e+] 
ow 
eS 
o 
3 
a=] 
= 
wn 
i=] 
37a 
co — 
=o: 
wn 
m 
Ss 
<j 
= 
5 
co 
So 
> 
sp 
a 
oO 
' 
era in human 
Tica alone oo a a this rev 
nity, and su ns the nations eo enforce her laws 
against the steve 
AUSTRALI Sy que received papers from Sydne 
to the 20 ich we learn that the Dikaatiae 
remo bbb guing on-well, and in the last year 
it po upwards -of-1,200 bales of wool to Sydney by 
e oflarge quantities forwarded 
gence | those 
that the accounts 
migrants, aft to 
cee : 
cto i fter long. 
as reported that the dick ei 
is 
ation, a determ 
ca it 
Sour etters rs received from districts to 
a) ode thy feeling in the co T 
y ne Cape Aviat ened had been 
‘a . 
to pre orial to the Legislatur e, praying for leave 
to establish ditties for. fig alt Si wine re “aitge and 
uty affecti distillers 
that ould be re- 
os Ag aan ms are offere the best s polite of raw 
pear r mad m usntites of not less than 
m gr oe ae 
100 Ibs. Pas arrivals of settlers were looked ~ from 
Germany and other parts of the continent of Europ 
¥Parliament. 
HOUSE vet LORDS. 
Monday.— everal petitions w: resented ; others one 
Roe Duke a RICHMOND, Aung the Vale of Orford. A Aberdeen 
: against parts of the tariff which related to the ies. 
The noble poe expressed al; 
col 
'. msidered many 
ing pace of oki 
up passen 
: he need not refer to the frightful accid 
recently occurred on a hate in a nei ne ent which had 
e,aS 
ber deanoer’ of any al tera. 
: te 
‘animals aa the same sep without reference to their weight or 
and Lord Kinnatrp briefly snpported 
value 
5 
am 
A 
a foeea writte 
KINNAIRD said ‘that his noble friend 
e he had 
of WE 
e of WELLINGTON said that before moving for the 
i okie Lo - should be perfectly certain that such a 
erro it read last Sund 
ch Lor id, he inly was in the belief Ct 
he had heard such a letter read last rim adayi 
The e Du ke INGTON said, ‘if there were such | a letter, he 
t dropped. 
r, addressed 
near him could ¢c . 
ay a 
7 teh —Lord WHARNCLIFFE, i in 
Hathert 
evils resulting from canal navigati 
introdu asure upon the subject duri 
hey woe ud afford every Sea in their power to fred no oble Lon rd 
should ‘orward a ure empowering the 
bring fo: 
to prevent Sunday trai Ah ony 
Lord Kinnarrp then rose, and, 
purs 
y of the Queen ’s tage to the Axhbishop 
the cler, 
nm rd 
rton on Saat a sone said that ~imste was a the 
Sundays, and that ‘although 
from oe mee o public business, Gove eothatc ie nt could not undertake to 
o aid in Sg yee to =. 
dverte ed o 
ng the present Session, 
who 
t to notice, moved fora 
of Can terbury ry, for the 
> ignorance e 
e of gt 
etter, son thought thers was ¢ 
priety of the course adopted by Government 
ati at the peenhe hem 
Duke of WELLINGTON € 
pro 
in issuing Scare a docu- 
The D xplai ich had 
prevented him from knowing that oe letter had been ra when 
e subject had been brought ae i House on a ering th poten 
frankly confe t bei ent fr myo recess 
the seuenieiet distres 
s in sa) 
that ad ere id objection water er to the produetion of the net 
which several noble L 
sued, i 
The Lorp CHANCELLOR moved, that he 
tself into a commi i 
re before th ip 
tice, less i the a =e Bose — it was intended w 
hich ser obtai ned the con- 
ords joined 
House oe —— 
Pp 
Lord BroveHamM op 
pose 
ich was that it contained $i "Ghjectionabla she 
riod of co copyright would be of 
robation. 
a! grounds, one of 
rospe ective clause. 
no use to authors, 
f 42 years than 
1 
giv 
of 28. He had obtained a calew 
yalue of copyrights for each period, supposing each yield 
nd 
profit of 100/., ve he fourid that the copyright of 
worth 730/, and that for 42 years. only 781/. 
ence in value 
taf 
aiken therefore, no benefit wi 
able an wad kee 
years 
Even this wal differ- 
oe gine ie a 
id result to Aer! public, by kee Keeping up phe ited of valu- 
“ t the comparative 
Hers. 
h disad- 
eepin 
Lord LytTrELTON elk 
ill insufficient, ae sai 
aera 6 
othe Bhp of age tenses supported 
works 
wal expire sor 
bropelated Pf o bookseller. 
= he would 
doubted Wiethar ‘che pro 
pe ie would = ges 
ace not t be 
but m the groun a 0 
objet of the bill ; 
sed 
cial to authors. 
bill. The bill then 
ing that the clauses might be fully discussed o 
what recaution: 
he ‘tion 
= the Ecclesiastical — in Ireland 
hich was rst ti 
t the terms of pro’ mbes 
t the arguments of Lord 
authors who sold their works, did sie euinly to 
most ) t 
the presen’ ad- 
should eroraed to the wethat'e family was frequently ap- 
granted b Dog 
easure. ‘He said there 
not oppose the bill, on he 
addition of 14 years to the term of 
He thought 
ane of sven or a to authors, 
ter rred 
that the bill 
in the general 
apniutiee elke ate be 
cordial assent to the principle of the 
passed atin committee, with the understand- 
n the bringing up ofthe 
Frida ay.—Lord WHARNCLIFFE stated in reply to Lord Dunally, 
had been taken by = sft geeaen for the preven- 
f the n the county of Ti ry. 
Ip 
‘vill i transferring appeals 
the House of Lords, 
OUSE OF COMM 
Monday.—Col. 
the borough o 
Attorn y. Gen 
in bribery at es late rena for Ipswi 
On motion mn 
pri on oe ir a 
with 
salted provisions an n live cattle. 
Mr. GLADSTONE ie, that “tie shipown 
peng was now yin 
beiireess 
— hake 
. Lasoucaere and Mr. 
3; an r 
in all instances the 
mittee. 
, fitting 
etween 7/. and sl. Sor the beer quantit 
Rocne made a 
H ON 
RUSHBROOKE oe that a new writ be gre 
th, in the of M . Wa 
€ same articles respectively, 
a view, particulary, to the be necarvirens of the duties upon 
mw 
ciple mipe 
on co tag in Raggi of the pce ca of Mr. Cataghats, who, 
pe: o be negatived without a division, and th 
Mr. Mies then ought forward the motion of which he had 
- given 
cecigrti “ ‘that the duties to be levied upon all sm — 
and c’ the body of county m 
the Re Hon, tans 
road, he h d to the different railroad com and for the silent end 
in England the opinion of Government, that the = sr tectenng 
ing med doo jages was unnecessary — a of oe pescnnets Bat the time 
e 
not be 
(the Great W estera) that now Carano the pi 
Duke of Ric 
eee as of ferekaas cattle, which 
é scussion. He 
sorta opinion that justice had not A sne done $i i tt e agricul! 
ractice. 
MOND phremengen a petition relative to the im- 
sed = 
? The “Ba arl of Ripon defen “i eae “nb i 
that the price of meat, and the oreign 
such as to 
moderate duty injuring the in Great — 
-The Duke saarecta 
cy of the Tariff in admitting 
ntries, 
preclude the possiblity of its imac et at a 
interests 
rted on bony he consider 
the importation of 
monstrating exatnat the l lowness of t 
meat, 
in ners 
tection to ge British farmer, a 
peas Ag He -spplaniied the financial me he 8 ee r. Reel. 
aimed cr: undin 
oe for the taco ue pkey (oy siden him, 
hey had brooked _ 
for silence was no 
when a legitimate ine 
oposed duty on We, as 
ue om “5 ea | saying that 
oped that 
e but for just 
ppaesioc adopt his a cacattent. Mr. PALMER 
Charkahied), in seconding the mation, declared bad bois Toad at the 
existing tariff to be very 
on Weromas rNlop-were was not afraid ' t 
uld injure the ‘farmer by sending 
among the agriculturists. 
the Setinaant states 
cattle into this-country ; 
Mr. 
that night. With 
had failed 
for they had really had no cattletosend. Lord Marcu regretteg 
to differ from his colHeague, the previous speaker, whose — 
were not those of 
G. HEATHCOTE supported the amendment, from a conviction “4 
ment proposi ai 
fr. firmed that at pa a had precisely the 
r of the amendment, and they 
British farmer from that part ‘of the proposed tariff which related 
to ca attle. ona the | state of the country, Si r R. Pe el would 
as to the all iled 1 urist 
ms of prices at the late emt fairs ene ed th 4 
n 
at 
° al of the trast states 
entur tebne to an extent which left them J kt 
Some had Pos ene tt that in ,five years the i 
reach 80,0 0 he ad Pp an , 
pri 
cenit the existing pro ? Because even if the impo rt were 
Dey ets be would do good as far as it should go, and would 
ate mand for our manufactures toa pF oportionate extent, 
For so tl au idment, 
ae Bowrine made va ariousstatementsin ‘supportd of the 
Govern. 
proposition, whic garded as a great and important 
ar gh aie ocnpet und principles in legislation. Lord Norreys said 
this motion seem ned to be intended for the purpose of gétting yy 
om soothe 
He woul 
the farmers for what 
arty te 
an agricultural division, which m 
had passed abo ut the corn law. not be ap 
p. r. GALLY Knieur ridiculed the notion of any alarmin 
import of cattle from countries whose meat was so "inferior t 
ours, that they durst not exhibit it in the shape of a joint. be 
would, therefore, lend ur 
to open the way for the return of the loose and Gane 
Ministry of last year. After noite eee from I ord ALFORD Di 
i re) 
rt 
Lord J. RussELL cucneuatea uments of those. who op. 
the arg 
those who non gee the amendment; and said he re 
M 
interest 
w onditi 
of the sitet But he could not reconcile Sir R. Peel's rine 
measure vad his conduct on other matters, particularly on the 
corn-law. If cheap fish and cheap meat re a great benefit, 
corn? and yet, as corn, the great object had 
why not ten 
been to prevent its cheapness. 
poe of the Government measure, the noble Lord concluded _ 
saying, ‘‘on the whole, therefore, while I agree in the general 
grounds of the Tariff, I cannot assent to 
I cannot see that its practical benefit will be so great asthe im. 
man who os ved this amendment 
mission of cattle will tmumbshately take pace 
to a great eaten, — I thin 
ciple. It is, in the first place, putting an end to pr vohibhe 
tion; in the next place, it is apportioning a fixed oth moderate 
duty to anode agra) of consump iow: but when the hon. gentle 
notice of a motion for meer rw the duty on 
roposition of the h 
bart EEL L beereedy: that 
might have been supposed from the speec 
been the advocate of the Senta mals amy supply of food; mele 
con rowed the noble os rey = pr a a a protection, in ~o shape 
of an uty, m. Baronet then aren 
songs Ja Russell himself had not, a8 
respect to this particular topic, hé wa: 
observe that the panic “was pectapun and the price of rei 
rising. | 
London or in Liyerpoo — The 
<_ inlet ‘would not lower ear ; it would, at best, be ae a 
sede wu uanee & paar 2 We ae an (oi 
chan propose 
meet omg it. were perfec ty se Fo oes 
yielded to the solicitations any es wk fr 
ad waited on him k for increased protection, for 
ected with blag a. the agricultural body, and I 
knowieaty do anything which would prove injurious to the 
think, ere, that by agreeing to the pro 
the agricult te: self ag 
agricul tural re, ; 
of the consumer ae 
for the sgpnice: 9 
I can make concessl 
—- _ present occasion, but must adhere to the proposal Baye 
whi ill by a majority 
TM. J. O’ConnELL approved of the admission of cattle ; and 
wished the principle mad er applied to corn,— Lord WoRSLEY 
Supported Mr. Miles’s in.— Mr. _VILLIERS could not treat 
with n the people 
ussion, how d d 
dan sateantiod of the prac s sufferi 
replied to the insinuations a the he preredig speaker 
reference 4 the Corn-laws; oot _ observations from 
Mr. aap. against the amendm had 
that mo 
‘arm 
was the “eine —Mr. 
which the Demuiites divided, when tee “appeased 
Ministers, ot iff, 380 ; for Mr, Miles’s proposal, 313; ma 
It w arranged that th bia - Bi 
e third reading of the Income-ta 
should be ae af — Monday, and that of the i 0g Rowsec ya 
uni t hich M 
ie {Ind nett, sites whieh, Owl 
The Paves aviation a. was read @ 2 
and passed, 
‘ 
j 
i 
f 
; 
