THE GARDENERS CHRONICLE. [June 4, 
and | tioned, the Court would not assume illegality, —— 7 be in the Kin "s road, hieepye were re-examined, charged with h; E 
Kingstown Kingstown and eng on the atmospheric \ Apes lings of preciacly proved. The allegation here was not s tly sup- . mber of valuable geraninms and ie 
that the works will be in fall ep aa in / patighis ed, and he costs 5 be" paid int the — ‘appealed against by rae Tt (The pr p iinte e in € case was the improper T beha- : 
rom rovin reducing the on t to id into iour haves } t the p % 
said — be te favour: ble for the ecaeaieerioth The | within p tea r 2 Mr. Dennis’ : empl OF a paige Le stolen property. Mr, 
i : , see 4 
corn crops hout large districts of Limerick, Cork, in ee all Coun — om 1 cdh ony al or tended f mp doer: eeriaieal uiry, i c stock aero which a 
Clare, and Galway, are represented as being esea forward = and dis tion amongst his children, “‘subject, Laie, geran e 10s,, had beer sold re aman named Davis, th th he pr a 
e elds of wheat already runing into ear. o the dower weet s at co law of his wif e, Jane A 2? cathe cae ‘the Pin e Apple ‘daehies op, King’s-road, by prisoner Ba “ie. cE 
few days since r eld of me hay was cut near The real estate of the testator proved to be vested in a trustee, | ong that ond ne contact had left two jessamines there. n pro clan , 
i it. 8 e same neighbo , 4 
Loughrea. The Tipperary papers state that the ‘recent sorter Wax: bined td yey ag aoe e ctities to 5 Sehacan | 2 nam pate Breemadi , some other geraniums were found. wise d rer ‘ 
yariable weather, fluctuating between copious showers under the will, as manifesting an intention of the testator examination, Davis said he was sure in hi: ¥ mind that Bayes had not _ 
arm sunshine, has been peculiarly favourable, and | that she should have so much as adage eave. ease = erated wengcrie at pyre he did not iknow anything about 
fond i i a i titied to if the trust had not interpose ice-Chancelior S er 
the spring corn 1s coming up with great vigour and F pa i a h eeper, 
. . . said, that it was an extremely hard case upon the widow ; reeman, appeared equally sirous 0 screening t e prisoners and. 
freshness. - Potato planting and turnip sowing are pro- | put the Court had no power to make a provision for her could not say in any way how ges een 4 
ing well, and the. reports of the May fairs continue | which the testator had not nae, The’ question which fhe me) am = Fagin up “dey were. Som ae es *} a 3 
i e Repeal ciation Id its weekl Court had to determine was whethe ing was given to the 4 aniums ha 
favourable ue da The exinee wads well y widow, and that must be found either by express words or by broken by some parties, and he suppose 
eehing sia ¥ 8°, ae implicatio If a testator recited in his will that he had Lees a | their stea since the Jas t examination he 4 
consisted in the reading several letters, present nothing o party a legacy, and it did not appear upon the will that any legac had found some ie the geraniums at a baker’s in ‘the ‘Fulham- road. 
interest, Theweek’s rent was announced to be 103/. 3s. 5d. | was actually given, the Court was in the habit = aa — ees Sores pees fob thesis Hed hey had give a 
j i the recital # the gift ant Bh tly expres: the inten se an Vis came into ~ 
“rom the Preteens’ Cont oe Wetieresy, Dr. Radelidie amounting = t “ an ac taal gift. if, "on the ther hand, the recital | the sho ‘op t the ‘moment after, and in the presence of the baker and iis q 
oe judgment in the case of the Deanery of St. taba Ta ty ; fans og nba d bought them of the man Bayes then in 
Patrick, for the vacancy in which there are two claimants pendent of any gift from the Testator, it could not be said that | custody. ay ageranr egy the subject, and declared he had — 
—the Rev. Dr. Wilson and i ev. wre Daly. The | by such a recital a gift was intended; for the very expressions bought the oar P. ants produced in Covent Garden Market and not — 
ay h of Bayes, as he had before stated. Prisoners declared they kn ; 
case has been lon ae ted and has created some interest used would show that the testator must have thought there was ’ B y knew 
“ L tong gate * | nonecessity for his entertaining any such anintention. The giftto nothing about the plants... But evidence nenee been me en that they — 
The point at issue w s the ad mmissibility of the Mie of the | the trustees was to be subject to the dower of the wife, and it was had already admitted haying ta aos the ten 10s. geranium and jessa- — 
Archbishop of Dublin anc the “yee Dr. Todd for Dr. | probable that the testator intended that his widow should not be mines, they we 4 
Wilson. The judgment of Dr. dcliffe was in favour | Without some apt: a but suppose it _ been subject to oe sary witness. 
t 4 bt or charge which the testator thought he owed, or that 
of the Rev. R. Daly, who is s esquently now dean of | © ‘ 
stranger was entitled to, and it proved the ebt or af 
St. Patrick. charge, it plainly could not then be raid that he intended to give SPORTING. 
. Kilkenny.—The oe vod Johnstown = this | to the stranger that which he had devised his estate under the TATTERSALLS, Tnurspay.—There have been several defalea. | 
county was thrown in exc ent on Sund impression that it was subject to. The Court could wes oor’ Sey tions in the se ettlement on | the late Derby ; one party i is said to have 
y h l f ols Y | the degree of relationship which existed, and by that m ces 
port t bed gent eman of large | geayour to spell, from the circumstances, an intention to Peedites have been numerous. The following bets were laid in the course of 
een burned to | a benefit which the testator might or might not have entertained. the afternoon :— 
ec sa was said at the bar, that the children were nearly of age, and wd 
were desirous that the widow should not be unprovided for; they Even on Mr. Ramsay’s a Lat anere st (laid to about 500/.) 
soni therefore poeon it in their power to make an arena prea 5 to : agst Mr. Orde’s Beeswing (laid to about 1007.) 
by which any intention the testator might have had in f of | 5 to 1 —— Mr. Combe’s The Nob 
Ae san would not be defeated. The Court could not hold that here — Sir G. He sais s Bokhara (300 to 56 laid once) 
she took any ot nder the words of the will. GER. 
OLLS RT.— Dawes.—In this case a bill | 2tol ao = btn s Attia (take) 
ext of ki his late wife, who was a subjectof Great Britain 7101 ——- Mr Bowes? 8 Meteor (20 ek 1 lai Ap 
The plaintiff, in consequence of hi g ived his wife, meet for the ng inde Vase a 
ed to be entitled to smch part of he erty as she had te orus, epelas ith , St. meals Heng, Ade vy, Yorkshi 
place, The settlement was cco = pees according to 
a . 
a t MARK LANE, Fripay, June 3.—Since Mon 
and the property, ingen ~— that he had been legally divorced in | of Wheat hi Essex and Suffolk has been mo pees. 
? France du corp 3 biens, A suit, however, had been insti- day’s currency was with difficulty gaara The free Fore 
{ was sup- tated in the ye ecclesiastical court respecting the right to admi- | is avery sl or Stig but the same prices are demanded. The 
and as property was outstanding in the hands | weather has produced a Satiiose in the trade for 3 
nit had nm instituted to obtain a re- | there has been about ao ore entered for consumption in Loi 
clesiastical court, and | d i and Beans ar 
i in 
that, upon the appointment of an administrator, | value, but Oats are in  deemaaet at 1s. advance, in consequence ¢ be 
ll parties might be ascertained and the property cocaine accounts from Ireland. q 
s . Toth e 
e latter part of the prayer th 
defendant put in a demurrer, in support of which it was insisted Wheat, ‘eae, D Kese, and Radeth : eae aw yhite eee to 6 fo 
a uestion would be determined in the ecclesiastical cou Norfolk, Lincolnshire and York 
sa decided om right administration ought Barley a eae ae shores and distiting 22 to 25 
the bill was filed with Oats, Lincolnshire sna roach nig a 15to 24 ree ed be i 
ad in his the property paoreets a age a ieish umberland and Scotch . . pa Be “~ ye Po is 5 
eee meine in the ecclesiastical court— = that PTs Age Sie eee oes Tien A 
‘endant; but the second object Boauh, Macagin, ots andneéw |. e4toag | Tick so t0 35 Harrow %8 
hes where the 8 ei the, -parties determined after a tie mg ae ener. ae a} 40 a Wists. — — La 
epresentative had been appointed. If the fate of ee" demurrer Seago dee 2 
p eure ba! the —_ pie oe the right to the property WEEK Y IMPERIAL AVERAGES. 
rs co be determine e adju ion i iasti ’ Wheat Bar 0 Rye. 
res tions of improvement in the f this the rigttt to the re esentatin pn the ecetmeiention) | apt ap sh Sei | 0-7 | a 8 193) 32 11 
county ; and since our last, there ipene as gree been but ‘t could not pa sins Bas hat question. It did no co hp ioe. ei g a i 9 0 “ia 3 al 
few outrages or disturbances of the peace. The same and in the absence of anyinformation ah ung ean aoe J 36 3{ 19 6| 31 3|-3l 9 
papers mention that the aie Cartpls clergy have ren- whether the administrator, “when appointed, would refuse to ad-) ae fae ri ee LE RS A Be jeer 
dered themselves obnoxious to t isturbers, by tl minister the property in perfect conformity with the rights of the A eg Sar ORIG Toes ie f Id 7 | oe °F | meh 
d y their uatiog interested, the demurrer must be allowed. Italso might | weeks’ Aggregate Aver.. 60 9| 26 9; 19 5| 82 4| 81 7 
exertions to draw away fs ‘inating from the illegal | eventually be necessary to have all the evidence taken in this sigiBtec inns [2 e [a 
societies. sit noc ees. cts adjudicated upon; but at present the necessity Duties - «| 12 01 10 ) 1020 
id no sen ar. anbrvals IN THE RIVE T WEE 
z ¥F QUEEN’S BENCH. — — v. Aimes.—This w: jour. Wht. | Barl. oie It.) Oat: e e. | Bus, | Peas 
Edinburgh.—O - ee 5 iouaieckantink agains ae the defen gentle seg er fr fottatie tt English . oe sks — Bris. | 4592 sage | 6245. 4108, Je Von | 98 
‘gh.—On Monday, the general assembly met Dorsetshire, for oopaeuD & eae whigh was alleged to be | Foreign | 1034 ” ae | ee eet) 
and pronounced a sentence, suspending from their judi- | 4 public pathway, and cee we: caves mek § _ es — wate wg alg be 
cial functions in Presbyterie san » = superior a sono dood vals brag eyelid me : 
jadicatories, till the first Wedn esd o Merk s the on: ace ay Berg — ewe ee the | jek parntnscsy a ver- GAZETTE OF THE cen 
following reverend gentle Re ill Pp afterwards been 6btained to mia be ag —J. H. Clark and H. C. kame g William-street, wines 
ng g men, vin: Rtg Stivling, set aside the verdict, and have a new trial ; and thisrule had been od -street, Cheaps ide, yrarehoatena G. 
eg Grant, the Revs. J. Robertson, A. C e, G. Peter, | made absolu n uneaioal had ol nce been made to the court i Baldin Ti iia ing, Berka) 
ope, J. Wilso _ of W to give some directions as to costs. The Court decided th 
“ail Pye M A ‘Walston n), J. Cook (Haddington), rule was to be made absolute on the payment of costs. serge tcce — G. Big Co Exch y bev Th nese : eet, com 
- Mr. H : gieport) ; and they havere-| The Queen vy. the Churchwardens of St, Martin’s-in-the- Fields. — | Dockhe ap ail-mall, rchitect 
i rd Denman delivere judgment in this e. e churchwar $ 
dens and overseers of this parish had, under the provisions of the 
1 which regulated the ra of » imposed a rate re ds 
upon a private box at Covent-garden, which Miss Burdett Coutts oi" Derbyabine, 
held under a lease originally granted to the late Mr. Coutts. The | E™et80n, Manchester, thr. cad tvanufacturer—J, Jackson, Ba 
question depended on the meaning of the — tenement,” ont ae zB icreden"y Bradford, “Ferkahive, woolstapler 
which was used in the act ; and the Court was of opinion rthad |-3- Qualiq: teorth net ira con, ae uni, 
this word, as there employed, would apply to apevate tore atthe cutter—C. 8 
sey i and as judgment mist therefor re bein updertand, iscucnonger~W. Harper 
Cacae oF 8 or Conn Wis: [Be Yad sningebched of the rate. ie ‘Wooldale, Ynkahres Bone 
be Aibert i , Yorkshi , 
(the Lard Warden), Lord Lahgésta; aaeaiitangunss ig- Kehwort. 
ram, and Baron Parke.) Thomas v. Vice al mS ber stage oa 
. ° > ? 
Monday his Royal Highness attended at the above court, which | * a ~ Walker, aa dshire, m 
h, n bee held in the gap aes atthe Duchy of Corn wale Ome, ATION y 
arioch, who — in- | Somerset House, and proceeded to deliver judgment in th 
mm him, sree eatled to the bar; end a sites some | C2¥Se, Which had been deferred from é, Sy alt, His opal |B 
iscussion, their referred to the co Highness was attired in green Genoa velvet ronan] with 
ssion. crimson sie aan = Brags witha deep Relies ae the 
same material. His crimson velvet, turned BIRTHS.—O ith, Mrs, G 
" : a ne de > urt =r greatly crowded. . The ca bowed cae E. Ginten Bln or pede espana 
ee ee tes the ~ — — a — of th s . d Brompton, of a 
p nas or Bg pring 5 gers v. Grazebrook.—This was an ari wall. vel Vice-Warden ofthe park Paved} y of Liewt.Co . C. Mandeville, of the Madras 
sf cist a Na pe of ee Vice- Chancellor of England, di- jndgment, which wis e this eff ne * phat th the aa bias & the 27th ult., the’ oe ae PEEL so “te De Whisaker Bea of 
assurance, to be paid into cou 1. Thopiebeas upon mpeliey of) Toy petiti atrice — no bag iatad of a illo gard 2 brigg the judges | Ea enor, othe 2th ult., Woodbary = rnsey-green-lanes 
premises belonging to a of ses — ould be his so 
pepe blneie try of temame at gst mibwrg, | Cie rcs oaenen, is Royal ighenstavin ed the | Si 2 pa 
painter cu my tf ye bet ogy 4 oe in the joint Gabba of ti tiff had no ground S 2a ana tppiieaiin tea ts mae el . see : — 
an nun A fi * Lat Be 
enti and Mt Hane, ae cores, Sod i ueeaae at | coz meats regarded the retoration of posession, or ot the | 4a 
the assignees of Hunt, who had become ban e claim | the remedy must be sought ina c et oF ges Nod reaulss. Por 
“93 pate g ‘Sotained wy disputed, on the — that his security ule be drawn because the claim was for th focan | Eb, D. 
a d on urious consideration e Vice-Ward r 
Chancellor, in delivering judem ment, observed that as vekaeaen = = pes . any aon pte ghia ge eet oth the sou 
the sum of 590/. he concurred in opinion with the Views Chan. | Principles of equity. He Py Ba gar da ngage ns the danghte 
cellor, and that sum must be paid a ~ Court by the assignees, | 18 his (the Vice. Warden's) court, bug which were ae ie aa si Ra 
The policy was for the benefit of the mortgagee, and the amount | TOUS as to decide question. “His Ro: Highness conciniies d Eaq., of tge—On 
received upon it, in respect of the epilemiess contained in the | P¥ Saying, “I think no such Ah ag pers exists ; and m luded ult, at Deventer, i vv of hE Excel! 
mortgage, must be applied oe his mers nt. As tothe remain. | ™ent is, that the Viee-Warden’s decree be reversed, and th hax we ota aged 
ing zee, that was paid by the Pheenix-office as compensation for | ™U*Fer im thecourt below allowed.” : " ————— 
mmachinery destroyed, oie had bot been the subject mei cnget Po. oO creda’. of the Masten | 
—_ Messrs. B > d-street, Fleet-* 
gage. His Lordship added that the sfecial circumstan Ang t n Thursday, at the Magistrates’ Court, Queen Square Fig mo Qo pate Seley poet bt hed 
not qualify ecision, for as to the usurious transacti m- the gardener ‘Mr, med ee bere Fase agua Haggerstone, in the mart Sy Cm iitep setts Aa Gy nag ite ® Gout yas y ac 
7 ennis, an extensive florist, carrying on business | Editor. a, Aavertneme urs ania Cormsnpsications exe to 6a, sadzest® 
une 4, 1842, 
